User talk:Titoxd/Archive25
Welcome to my Talk Page! DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE. This archive page covers approximately the dates between November 13 2007 and March 3 2008. Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary. Please add new archivals to User talk:Titoxd/Archive34. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 10:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Infobox hurricane current and other basinsIs there any way to get {{Infobox hurricane current}} to work for other basins and their relevant terminology? There have been cases of users adding incorrect or non-working infoboxes to season articles that the template doesn't yet work for, such as the NIO. I'd do it myself but I'm not sure how to navigate the code (templates have never been my forte). --Coredesat 22:47, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
my rfa If you voted in my RFA...
...thank you for your participation. I withdrew with 83 supports, 42 opposes, and 8 neutrals. Your kind words and constructive criticism are very much appreciated. I look forward to using the knowledge I have accrued through the process to better the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers and Wikidudeman for their co-nominations.
My RfAThank you so much for voicing your support in my successful RfA. I'm humbled to have the community's trust. As I master the ways of the mop and bucket, please don't hesitate to message me for any advice or corrections. Cheers! Spellcast 00:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Hi. The list is formatted like a List of topics, not at all like a List of basic topics. E.g. see List of basic biology topics vs List of biology topics. I'd suggest moving it back to the previous title, and reincluding the deleted information. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists of topics vs Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists of basic topics for details, or ask The Transhumanist. Thanks. --Quiddity (talk) 00:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Unexplained article moveHi, Tito; I need to bring this to someone who understands the issue in Spanish. By moving it from the question mark to the explanation point (contrary to sources and with no discussion), the article is now POV, implying that the king demanded rather than asked (that it was an imperative rather than a query). All of the sources I have seen use a question mark, and since I'm not an admin, I can't move it back. I'm also not sure if I can post a request at Requested moves, since I don't know if CieloEstrellado will challenge. I'll also post to Jossi, since he speaks Spanish. Saludos, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
By the way, here's another strange move done by CieloEstrellado—the article he moved from a list is clearly a list. Electoral division of Chile. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
As you requested :)For this, I honor your subtle request :) Acalamari 02:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)  Re: Image:Danielle Newspaper.gifI'd buy that logic if the picture actually showed something. I see a silhouetted object, and it is not remotely clear what it is. It can't enhance your understanding if it doesn't tell you anything. Oh, and it would be best to have left the dispute tag, commenting on the talk page and let a more distant admin deal with it...--Nilfanion (talk) 09:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC) Improperness of Pilsudski's nomI would like to learn more why do you find my nomination of Piłsudski's article improper. Having spend over a year polishing it, I do try to address all concerns. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 05:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Copyedit requestRight now I can't do any copyedits, at least until I'm done with Emma Goldman. Maybe in another week or so. If I don't get back to you then, leave me another message please. Cheers! – Scartol • Tok 01:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
SlashesLook what Tony is up to, just when I was talking about him not liking slashes; I didn't realize it was a MOS item. User:Tony1/Advanced editing exercises (He's still building this, not ready for primetime yet.) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
MediaWiki:Mainpage/enIf I change MediaWiki:Mainpage/en to "Main page", will that alter the logo or sidebar links, or just the label? --- RockMFR 06:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC) Peer Review RequestHello, Titoxd, I saw your name on the list of volunteer reviewers and wondered if you had time to look at Youngstown Ohio Works, a small article about an early 20th-century baseball team. The article is now rated B-class, but I think it stands a chance of being promoted to GA status, with the help of an experienced reviewer. I would appreciate any and all recommendations! Sincerely, -- twelsht (talk) 23:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Award
Confused re:User:The Evil SpartanRE: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive338#Arbcom election drama I wrote:
I was a little confused by your now archived response [2]
My response [3]
Just curious, and my apologies. I think I just read your comments completely wrong, as you had commented twice before above. T (talk) 09:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Hello, Titoxd, Thank you, again, for your valuable feedback! It made a big difference in the quality of this piece. I just wanted to let you know that, earlier today, another user nominated the article for FA status. With appreciation, -- twelsht (talk) 23:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC) AWB Usage and mbar -> MbarI Could stop making this edit, however mbar (as it is linked throughout the hurricane related articles) Loads as Mbar and oddly redirects to Bar (unit) which is described as "The bar (symbol bar), decibar (symbol dbar) and the millibar (symbol mbar, also mb) are units of pressure." So as different as they may be they do appear to be the same. Slysplace | talk 01:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I have been waiting for a review of this article. I created it, but it has not received a rating as per Wikipedia standards. Can you rate it? Thank you. CVW (Talk) 12:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC) Re: One up - the insanity beginsSweetness. :) Now, do you or do you not want me to comment on the FAC? Some of the IRC regulars said they would rather me not, because I would ruin their chances at a successful FAC if I wanted, or something like that, heh. Hurricanehink (talk) 07:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
WPTC Active MembersThanks, again, for your supportThis message is to thank you for supporting the FA nomination of Youngstown Ohio Works. Earlier today, I learned that the article had been promoted. Please know that your detailed critique of the article helped to make an FA nomination possible. I certainly appreciate all of your time and effort. Sincerely, -- twelsht (talk) 03:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC) Happy Birthday
-- Idontknow610 (WANNA TALK??) 10:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC) Peer review requestHi, Titoxd, I recently requested a peer review for Jimmy McAleer, a B-class sports biography that appears to be close to GA quality. This is yet another baseball-related article. I know this piece would benefit tremendously from your feedback. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated! Sincerely, -- twelsht (talk) 06:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC) WikiProject Winter stormsThere is a discussion started by User:Juliancolton at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Meteorology about a proposed/possible new WikiProject called WikiProject Winter storms. Feel free to voice your opinion on the proposal.--JForget 01:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC) Hey Titoxd. You commented on this one at FAR but I'm not sure if you were indicating a remove or an intent to work. Is it an FA? Marskell (talk) 02:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC) Hello! I'm just wondering what CBDunkerson's revision broke. (I loaded the message with the intention of performing the same edit.) Thanks! —David Levy 18:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Inactive WPTC usersJust to let you know, since you did not respond to the previous message, your status within the Tropical cyclone Wikiproject has been transferred to inactive. However, it merely looks like you're away, so when you come back, I hope you change your status back to active. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC) Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #12Number 12, January 10, 2008 The Hurricane Herald This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This edition of the newsletter, after an extended hiatus, covers December 2007 and the first ten days of January 2008. Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles. Storm of the month  Tropical Storm Olga was a rare Atlantic December tropical cyclone. The fifteenth named storm of the season, it developed near Puerto Rico on December 11, and quickly struck the Dominican Republic. There, it brought heavy rainfall and severe damage, and caused more than 40 deaths. Casualties were also reported in Puerto Rico and Haiti. The storm greatly weakened as it crossed Hispaniola, degenerating into a remnant low pressure area in the Caribbean Sea on December 13. The remnants of Olga passed near the Yucatán Peninsula before turning northward and bringing rainfall to Florida. Other tropical cyclone activity
Member of the month  The December member of the month is Mitchazenia. Mitchazenia has been a project member since 2006. He has created several tropical cyclone related articles, including the good article Subtropical Storm One (1982). Mitchazenia significantly contributed to 1983 Atlantic hurricane season, which is currently a featured article candidate. New and improved articles
Main Page content
Storm article statistics
Categories and more The project has gone under somewhat of a revamping. We have a new, more realistic goal. The members list has been dropped from 89 to 34. This newsletter is to inform users of a change in policy with categories. Previously, an Atlantic and Pacific storm article would have both Category:Atlantic hurricanes and Category:Category 3 tropical cyclones. However, the two were combined, resulting in Category:Category 3 Atlantic hurricanes. The same is done with Pacific hurricanes. Tropical storm articles are dealt with either Category:Eastern Pacific tropical storms or Category:Atlantic tropical storms. WP:METEO Active membersVädersolstavlanHello,
Request for peer reviewHi, I saw your name on the wikipedia:peer review volunteer page. I'm currently working on a science article called the Kardashev Scale, the page has gone through a lot of changes in the last 3 months, some of them reverts that I wish to overturn. I've sent out some notices to people who have worked on the page previously but I'm having problems getting open opinions and feedback. Their ideas about what they want the article to be about and look like are pretty set. I need outside opinion. In my opinion the Kardashev scale has 3 primary interests:
My primary goals are in advancing the content area of number 2 and diminishing the fictional content. After all, it is a scientific not a fictional topic. My secondary goals are to find and add published content on the extension of the scale. The feedback I have gotten is pretty much divided between goals 1 or 3. And I don't want to create a editing war! So please read the article and the discussion page and tell me what you think!!
Thx--Sparkygravity (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Heroes peer reviewI noticed that your user name was on the Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers list. I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the Heroes (TV series) talkpage and give us an honest peer review. The page has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at the Heroes Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. We have all worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. I you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Heroes (TV series)/archive2--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 05:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Deletion Review for In-Depth_BattlepediaAn editor has asked for a deletion review of In-Depth_Battlepedia. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike411 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC) -- Got it :) Mike411 (talk) 02:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC) FAR:Hurricane Irene (2005)Hurricane Irene (2005) has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Nergaal (talk) 01:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #13Number 13, February 2, 2008 The Hurricane Herald This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of January 2008. Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles. Storm of the month  Cyclone Gene formed on January 26 over the open south Pacific Ocean. It drifted southward, and strengthened into Tropical Storm Gene on January 28 as it moved across the Fijian archipelago. There, it brought heavy rainfall, which caused the worst flooding in several years. Half of the country was left without power, and the cyclone killed seven people in Fiji. The storm turned southwestward, developing a cloud-filled eye and quickly strengthening by the end of the month. Other tropical cyclone activity
Member of the month The January member of the month is Ajm81. A tropical cyclone editor since he first joined in October 2005, Ajm81 plays a vital role in the project. Unlike other editors, who mainly edit articles, Ajm81 maintains and updates the track maps across the project. We thank Ajm81 for his timely contributions, and may he have some well-deserved downtime after the last tropical cyclone report is released. New and improved articles
Main Page content
Storm article statistics
Wikiwork and 1000 articles In January 2008, the WikiProject began using a system called Wikiwork, or ω. It weighs the overall quality of the project's articles, and a lower number means a greater total quality. The weighed ω, as used above, is a relative number that can be used to compare groups of this article. As of this publication, the relative ω of the project is 3.404, corresponding to between Start and B class. However, when limiting it solely to storm articles, the number drops to 2.98, which is slightly better than B class. During the month, a new statistics page was created. Additionally, during the month, Mitchazenia pointed out that we received our 1,000th article with the creation of Cyclone Elita. Welcome back!Wow, I got worried for a while after you fell off the face of Wikipedia. I'm not going to ask where you've been for the last two months, but I'm glad you're OK and you're back. :) ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Yay, thanks a lot for those graphs. Very pretty, as always. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
I too am glad to see you back. Raul654 (talk) 19:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
It's a good day, so glad to "see you" back again! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC) Rollback grantingsI noticed you've been granting rollback, and so I thought that you might want to know that two userspace template messages, User:Acalamari/Rollback and User:NoSeptember/Rollback, are available if you want to give an informing message to someone if you've given them rollback. Thanks. Acalamari 18:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
RollbackSorry its taken a bit to get back to you. I see you're getting to grips with the new functions. Implementation was rather controversial, with mixed views as to whether consensus was reached for the feature. ArbCom refused to hear a case about it. Both Jimbo and Anthere have commented on the implementation - Jimbo here and Anthere here if you're interested. As to the practicalities of assignment, we seem to be seeing two views from admins. One believes that anyone who is not an idiot and hasn't abused the tool should be given rollback, the other regards it as purely an anti-vandalism tool to be given out to those involved in reverting vandalism (who have a demonstrated history of correctly identifying vandalism). I think the former is becoming the dominant view of those actively giving out the right. I do worry a little that this is creating a new class of user, rather than just assigning a new function and there has in my opinion been some fairly disappointing use of the function - giving rollback to users who have not asked for it and so not want it, admins giving themselves rollback when this does nothing and just makes it harder to keep track of who has the permission in the rights log, and the assignment of the rights to "joke" secondary accounts that clearly won't be involved in vandal fighting. Ultimately, admins are selected for a demonstrated ability to make good judgment calls - if you believe someone will make good use of the rollback right, its probably a good idea to give it to them (though I recommend asking first...). WjBscribe 01:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC) Copyediting....?Is there any chance you could copyedit Tropical Storm Alberto (2006)? It's on FAC right now, and a copyedit request from an outsider is requested. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Well that was a good way to kill an hour :) ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC) Could you please explain more fully?Could you please explain more fully how the Mike Silver article got deleted? The record shows you deleted it. But I don't see a record of where the discussion of its deletion occurred. Was this article about the Mike Silver who was one of the participants in the controversial skirmish where Omar Khadr is alleged to have killed a GI? Could you please userify this article, its edit history and talk page, to User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Mike Silver? I was going to expand the Mike Silver article with the new information about that skirmish, and I was very surprised to learn the article didn't exist, had once existed, and had been deleted. Geo Swan (talk) 21:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC) Template:WP1.0/assessmentsCertain projects (Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia, for instance) are using Cat, cat, Dab, and dab as parameters for "class" to distinguish among various types of non-article pages. Unfortunately, Template:WikiProject Philadelphia uses Template:WP1.0/assessments to generate Pennsylvania article assessments for all of its pages, and so pages with those parameters are marked as "Unassessed" when they should be treated as "NA" pages. Would it be possible to include them in the swtich statement in the WP1.0 template? I thought I'd drop by and ask since you seem to have done the work for it. Choess (talk) 00:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC) WikiProject Manual of StyleI've started a thread on a proposed new WikiProject to coordinate Manual of Style pages. I think this might provide a mechanism to address the problem without raising concerns about centralization of authority on the main MoS page. Your comments on whether and how such a WikiProject might work would be very valuable. See WT:MoS#WikiProject Manual of Style. Geometry guy 19:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
CopyeditHi. Would you mind looking over List of New York hurricanes and giving it a quick copyedit? Thanks, Juliancolton (Talk) 22:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Peer review for Jack WarnerHi Titoxd, Thanks, again, for your help on Jimmy McAleer! The FAC languished for more than a month, but I'm happy to report that the article was promoted. I just requested a peer review for a piece on movie mogul Jack Warner. The article includes a good deal of information, and it's reasonably engaging, but I know it can be improved. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated! Cheers, -- twelsht (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC) Hurricane KatrinaHi Titoxd. Would you have time to have a look at these threads?
Thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 00:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Admin Coaching Re-confirmationHello, previously you expressed interest in participating in the Wikipedia:Admin coaching project. We are currently conducting a reconfirmation drive to give coaches the opportunity to update their information and capacity to participate in the project. Please visit Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Status to update your status and move your entry to the Active list. Also, please remember to update your capacity (5th table variable) in the form of a fraction (eg. 2/3 means you are currently coaching 2 students, and could accept 1 more student). Thank you. MBisanz talk 09:33, 24 February 2008 (UTC) FloolaYou deleted Floola a few months ago. [4] I think it should be undeleted, though I'd like to know what was in the original version. What you saw when you deleted it may have been a stub, because the article has been deleted a few times before and people who had re-included info may have only added just links, and so on. However, it seems reasonable enough to keep because there are several other similar articles. See here: ☯ Zenwhat (talk) 19:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC) What about the previous versions? Can you see those? Meaning: Not the page you deleted, but the page version before that. ☯ Zenwhat (talk) 19:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC) Could you dump all of the stuff in those three versions here: It'd be helpful in doing a re-write. ☯ Zenwhat (talk) 19:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC) Yeah, you're right. That's a lot less than I expected. Not sure where I'd get sources to do the re-write anyawy. Thanks, though! ☯ Zenwhat (talk) 19:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC) Don't revert the whole thing!You reverted after looking only halfway into this. The colors are exactly the same! The new ones are going into the new template, plus some new labels added. I noted in the template which color was changed, then changed it back for the time being. The one in question isn't even mentioned in that discussion you linked to. NOTHING has been affected. Potapych (talk) 19:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #14The Hurricane Herald This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of February 2008. Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles. Storm of the month  Cyclone Ivan formed on February 7 and subsequently executed a loop to the west-southwest. Encountering favorable conditions, it strengthened to attain peak winds on February 17 before striking northeastern Madagascar. It degenerated into a remnant low pressure area as it crossed the island, and briefly re-organized into a weak tropical depression before dissipating on February 22. Ivan caused heavy damage in Madagascar, leaving 190,000 people homeless and causing over 83 deaths. Other tropical cyclone activity
Member of the month The February member of the month is RattleMan, for his lasting dedication and continual support of the project. During February, the user worked on improving the timeline articles for the previous season. RattleMan often updates the sections on storms in season articles, and helps to maintain the southern hemisphere articles. New and improved articles
Main Page content
Storm article statistics
Improvements During the month, a total of 15 new articles were added, though the net increase in start or stub articles was only three. The highest quality set of articles for a basin is for the Eastern Pacific Ocean, of which half of its articles are either a good article or better; all of its retired storm articles are good or better. However, the basin has a lower total number of articles, and the Atlantic basin has a higher overall total of good articles. There is a drive to increase the number of featured topics, which is located on the project talk page. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC) Flcelloguy's ToolI've been having problems with Flcelloguy's Tool for a while now (maybe approaching a year). I've posted a few messages, but the project appears mostly dead. Can you confirm / deny? Thanks! /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 04:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
RfB discussionsWith my understandable hightened awareness of said page, I saw your cry for mathematical clarity, and I hope I make sense :gulp: :) -- Avi (talk) 18:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC) |
