Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment
Wikipedia articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | Total | ||
FL | 1 | 1 | |||||
GA | 3 | 11 | 14 | ||||
B | 7 | 5 | 13 | 14 | 39 | ||
C | 5 | 33 | 39 | 58 | 135 | ||
Start | 14 | 65 | 124 | 203 | |||
Stub | 1 | 10 | 45 | 56 | |||
List | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 15 | ||
Category | 109 | 109 | |||||
Disambig | 3 | 3 | |||||
File | 44 | 44 | |||||
Project | 2 | 4 | 3 | 156 | 165 | ||
Redirect | 1 | 7 | 37 | 89 | 134 | ||
Template | 2 | 57 | 59 | ||||
Other | 1 | 6 | 7 | ||||
Assessed | 14 | 57 | 149 | 300 | 464 | 984 | |
Total | 14 | 57 | 149 | 300 | 464 | 984 | |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 2,021 | Ω = 4.54 |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Wikipedia WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia-related articles (for scope, see the WikiProject page). While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}}
banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Wikipedia articles by quality and Category:Wikipedia articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions[edit]
- See also the general assessment FAQ
- 1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?
- The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
- 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?
- Just add {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
- 3. Someone put a {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?
- Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the project talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
- 4. Who can assess articles?
- Any member of WikiProject Wikipedia is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.
- 5. How do I rate an article?
- Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
- 6. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- 7. What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
- 8. Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
- 9. What if I have a question not listed here?
- If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.
Instructions[edit]
Quality assessments[edit]
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject Wikipedia|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Wikipedia articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Wikipedia articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Wikipedia articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Wikipedia articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Wikipedia articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Wikipedia articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Wikipedia articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Wikipedia articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Wikipedia articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Wikipedia articles) | Category | |
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Wikipedia articles) | Disambig | |
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Wikipedia articles) | Draft | |
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Wikipedia articles) | File | |
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Wikipedia articles) | Portal | |
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Wikipedia articles) | Project | |
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Wikipedia articles) | Redirect | |
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Wikipedia articles) | Template | |
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Wikipedia articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Wikipedia articles) | ??? |
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.[under discussion] | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | 30 years war |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Wikimedia Foundation |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wikitravel |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Bellevue School District |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Geographical bias on Wikipedia |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of Wikipedias |
Category | Any category falls under this class. | Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. | Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. | Category:Wikimedia |
Disambig | Any disambiguation page falls under this class. | The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. | Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. | Wikipedia (disambiguation) |
File | Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. | The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. | Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. | File:Wiki.png |
Portal | Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class. | Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics. | Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date. | N/A |
Project | All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. | Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. | Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. | Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia |
Redirect | Any redirect falls under this class. | The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location. | Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. | Wikipedia:List of media personalities who have vandalised Wikipedia |
Template | Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. | Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. | Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. | Template:Wikipedia |
NA | Any non-article page that fits no other classification. | The page contains no article content. | Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. | N/A |
Importance assessment[edit]
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Wikipedia articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Wikipedia articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Wikipedia articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Wikipedia articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Wikipedia articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Wikipedia articles) | ??? |
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Wikipedia.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Importance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field. | Wikipedia |
High | Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. | Wikimania |
Mid | Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. | Polish Wikipedia |
Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. | Malayalam Wikipedia |
NA | Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. | Category:Wikipedia |
??? | Subject importance has not yet been assessed. | Magnus Manske |
Requesting an assessment[edit]
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
- Hello, I am wondering if someone could offer an assessment of the stub I have expanded, Literary fragment. Thanks for your time. Alsonamedbort15 (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a first assessment of Democracy in Asia. HudecEmil (talk) 20:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's my first time requesting a reassessment of any article, so please do pardon me if I make some informal requests but I think Gupta–Hunnic Wars deserves more than a C rating. Can't it be upgraded to B, GA or even an A rating? Jonharojjashi (talk) 16:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Kyah Simon Joeykai (talk) 05:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Minnesota State Highway 36. NotDragonius (talk) 00:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a first assessment of Anglo-German Payments Agreement. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 13:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done @,AbsoluteWissen, assessed as B.Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Patricia Guijarro Joeykai (talk) 15:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Wikipedia and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the article has been significantly expanded since its assessment in December 2023. Isi96 (talk) 01:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Midge Purce Joeykai (talk) 22:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of George W. Minns. It's initial assesment was in 2007, and I have added roughly 10,000 bytes in the last few months. SammySpartan (talk) 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done SammySpartan upgraded assessment from Stub to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Jaedyn Shaw Joeykai (talk) 22:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done @Joeykai, assessed as C. Expand more throughout the Early life and career sections if possible to get up to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Requests from 2024, January to April
| |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Also, I would like a reassessment of its importance. I believe it fits the criteria high, as the page is about a world-renowned pianist. Thanks EleniXDD (talk) 09:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests from 2023
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Requests from 2022
|
---|
|
Assessment log[edit]
Wikipedia articles: Index · Statistics · Log |
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
May 2, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Detention of Pavel Pernikaŭ (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- English Wikipedia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Founders of Wikipedia (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Larry Sanger (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from High-Class to Top-Class. (rev · t)
- War of the Encyclopaedists (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Wikigrannies (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Wikimedia censorship in mainland China (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Wikipedia logo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Index (publishing) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:Wikipedia article editnotice (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed[edit]
- Category:All articles with topics of unclear notability (talk) removed.
- Category:Bishonen test categories (talk) removed.
- ChemSpider (talk) removed.
- Category:Featured topic candidate log (talk) removed.
- Draft:George L. Ball (talk) removed.
- Draft:Golden Man Auto Parts L.L.C. (talk) removed.
- Category:Inactive WikiProjects (talk) removed.
- Category:Inactive Wikipedia database reports (talk) removed.
- Draft:Independent Age (talk) removed.
- John D. States (talk) removed.
- Draft:Napoleon Adok Gai (talk) removed.
- Category:Pages using backwards copy with unknown parameters (talk) removed.
- Draft:Ryan Blumenthal (talk) removed.
- Draft:Super Tech. (talk) removed.
- Category:Temporary maintenance holdings (talk) removed.
- Draft:Tor'i Brooks (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia database report templates (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia featured content candidate logs (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia files not suitable for Commons (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia free files (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia page-section templates (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia proposals (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia sections (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia vandalism-related user templates (talk) removed.
- Draft:Woja Emmanuel (talk) removed.
May 1, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Draft:List of Monuments in Bajrayogini, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Shankharapur, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Balambu, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Chandragiri, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Bhutkhel, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Kirtipur, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Budhanilakantha, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Budanilkantha, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Chalnakhel, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Dakshinkali, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Champadevi, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Kirtipur, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Chhaimale, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Dakshinkali, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Chobhar Adinath, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Kirtipur, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Danchhi, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Kageshwari Manohara, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Dharmasthali, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Tarakeshwar, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Sangla, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Tarakeshwar, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Satungal, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Chandragiri, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Saukhel, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Dakshinkali, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Suntol, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Shankharapur, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Thankot, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Chandragiri, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Tokha-Chandeshwori, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Tokha, Nepal.
- Draft:Madeline The Person renamed to Madeline the Person.
- Draft:Ruth Nvumetta Kavuma renamed to Nvumetta Ruth Kavuma.
- Draft:Sport Zone renamed to Sport Zone.
- WP:Useskin renamed to WP:Skin.
Reassessed[edit]
- Axel Downard-Wilke (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Lucy Moore (archaeologist) (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Siobhan Leachman (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- John D. States (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Removed[edit]
- Template:ACE MassMessage opt-out (talk) removed.
- Draft:Aidan Cutler (talk) removed.
- Draft:Akbar Shahpurwala (talk) removed.
- Template:AprilFoolsNotice (talk) removed.
- WP:Beta Cluster (talk) removed.
- Draft:Buragadda Vedavyas (talk) removed.
- Template:Burma-shave (talk) removed.
- Template:Category warning (talk) removed.
- Draft:Christopher Manske (talk) removed.
- Draft:DeAna Fai (talk) removed.
- WP:Don't retaliate (talk) removed.
- Draft:Essay; Wikipedia is not a reliable source (talk) removed.
- Hinton Ampner (talk) removed.
- WP:How to vandalize correctly (talk) removed.
- Category:Inactive task forces (talk) removed.
- Draft:Innovating Minds: Creative Thinking Process at JKITCDO (talk) removed.
- Template:Interlanguage link (talk) removed.
- Draft:Kalu Clinton (talk) removed.
- List (talk) removed.
- Template:Look from (talk) removed.
- Draft:Mai Sato Murder Case (talk) removed.
- Draft:Masline Investments (talk) removed.
- Mompesson House (talk) removed.
- Draft:Mundh (talk) removed.
- Draft:My sandbox (talk) removed.
- Draft:Myer R Wolfe (talk) removed.
- Template:NA-importance (talk) removed.
- Draft:Nelson Kwaje (talk) removed.
- Template:Non-free biog-pic (talk) removed.
- Template:Not Humor (talk) removed.
- Draft:Oleh Korikov (talk) removed.
- WP:One click archiving (talk) removed.
- Template:POTD/2010-06-18 (talk) removed.
- WP:Portal:Portal (talk) removed.
- WP:Precautionary principle (talk) removed.
- Draft:Precious Pepala (talk) removed.
- Template:ROOTPAGENAME (talk) removed.
- Template:ROOTPAGENAMEE (talk) removed.
- Template:RSS-Atom feed notice (talk) removed.
- Rainham Hall (talk) removed.
- Template:Registered editors by edit count (talk) removed.
- Template:Safety resources (talk) removed.
- Template:Sandbox-related templates (talk) removed.
- Draft:Sandrine Umutoni (talk) removed.
- Draft:Sharan kumar (talk) removed.
- Draft:Sierra Valley Gardens (talk) removed.
- Draft:Skantz (talk) removed.
- Draft:Skazz Shabazz (talk) removed.
- Smallhythe Place (talk) removed.
- Draft:Sparsh Suman (talk) removed.
- Draft:Stephanie Morales (talk) removed.
- Template:Template editor topicon (talk) removed.
- Draft:Third Folkung Uprising (talk) removed.
- Template:Toolserver IP (talk) removed.
- Template:Translate wikipedia (talk) removed.
- Template:UWRC October 26, 2015 editathon (talk) removed.
- Category:Uruguay Wikipedia administration (talk) removed.
- Category:Uruguayan Wikipedians (talk) removed.
- Template:User access levels (talk) removed.
- Template:User dislikes Wikipedia (talk) removed.
- Template:User topicon (talk) removed.
- Category:Users who do not wish to receive ACE messages (talk) removed.
- Template:Village pump page header (talk) removed.
- Template:WALRUS (talk) removed.
- WP:Wiki Loves X (talk) removed.
- Draft:Wikipedia Class (talk) removed.
- Template:Wikipedia article editnotice (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia articles needing expert attention (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia categories named after mass media companies of the United States (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia categories named after universities and colleges in North America (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia consensus-building templates (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia draft proposals (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia essays about building the encyclopedia (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia featured articles (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Uruguay (talk) removed.
- Template:Wikipedia sockpuppetry (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians by Wikipedia activity (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians from Baton Rouge, Louisiana (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians in Montevideo (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians in Tulsa, Oklahoma (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians in Uruguay (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians interested in Green Bay Blizzard (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians interested in Uruguay (talk) removed.
- Draft:Will Price (talk) removed.
- Draft:Wpedia (talk) removed.
April 30, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- German Wikipedia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
April 28, 2024[edit]
Removed[edit]
- Yuri Lushchai (talk) removed.