User talk:Isi96

Discretionary sanctions alerts

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Isi96!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Your recent editing history at QAnon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Orange Mike | Talk 04:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

The citation doesn't actually support the statement in the article and was accidentally added there while I was fixing a typo in the quoted material (I've posted on your talk page about it). Isi96 (talk) 04:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

About CNET self-contradiction

How could you say that there is no self contradiction? The second CNET row shows a date range of October 2020–present, and the third row shows November 2022–January 2023. They overlap, so the table contradicts itself on those two rows. In fact, my correction was wrong after reviewing it. I was correct on the second row, but the third row should have been November 2023-present to reflect Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 398#Beware: CNet running AI-generated articles, byline "CNet Money". Jesse Viviano (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

CNET has paused the use of AI-generated content after it was noticed, so there's no error there. It might be better to change the consensus for the entry you changed from "October 2020–present" to something like "October 2020–October 2022, February 2023–present". Isi96 (talk) 06:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

My bad, I went through the linked discussion and it seems your change was correct. Isi96 (talk) 06:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Lucy Moore (archaeologist)

Hello, Isi96,

Thank you for creating [[sustained coverage]. Note also Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Articles on Wikipedians.]].

I have tagged [[sustained coverage]. Note also Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Articles on Wikipedians.|the page]] as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The Guardian and CNN are both reliable sources, but both are published within a few days of one another. It doesn't look like there is [WP:NSUSTAINED

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Klbrain (talk) 10:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Biographies of women

Hi there, Isi96, and thanks for writing quite a number of biographies of women. If you intend to continue along there lines, you might like to join WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)