User talk:Syed Shaveer

This is Syed Shaveer's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayaz Sheikh (singer) (January 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Padavalamkuttanpilla was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ayaz Sheikh (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Padavalam🌂 ► 18:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Padavalamkuttanpilla Will follow guidelines. Syed Shaveer (talk) 18:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Syed Shaveer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Padavalam🌂 ► 18:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Ayaz Sheikh's career and contributions to the Pakistani music industry are well-documented and supported by reliable sources. His significant involvement in various television shows, collaborations with other artists, and educational background highlight his impact and relevance in the field of music. Deleting this article would overlook his achievements and diminish Wikipedia's coverage of notable figures in the Pakistani entertainment industry. Syed Shaveer (talk) 18:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayaz Sheikh (singer) (February 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Aviram7 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ayaz Sheikh (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 20:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayaz Sheikh for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayaz Sheikh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayaz Sheikh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandermcnabb

I believe the article meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines as it is supported by multiple reliable sources and provides significant information about the subject's intrudtion career. Additionally, the deletion discussion appears to be based on misunderstandings or disputes rather than genuine concerns about the article's quality or compliance with Wikipedia policies. Syed Shaveer (talk) 18:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Guessitsavis

Got it, won't remove. Syed Shaveer (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Ayaz Sheikh, you may be blocked from editing. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Guessitsavis Thank you for your message regarding the Ayaz Sheikh article.I assure you that my intention was not to disregard Wikipedia's policies. I've been working on enhancing the article by adding reliable sources and expanding its content.I'm committed to upholding Wikipedia's standards and will ensure future edits comply with guidelines, and i would also like to mention that if possible, the notice be removed in future edits.

Thank you for your understanding. Syed Shaveer (talk) 17:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions[edit]

Could you please stop adding short descriptions to articles. I've seen a number that don't look correct according to the intent. Please read WP:SHORTDESC. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood,Thanks. Syed Shaveer (talk) 22:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But you're still adding short descriptions, over 40 since you were asked to stop, and every single one of the 50 that I checked had to be rewritten or reverted. Please, stop. Wikishovel (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayaz Sheikh[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ayaz Sheikh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayaz Sheikh. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 15:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusSholto I am writing to request a reconsideration of the speedy deletion tag placed on the Ayaz Sheikh article. I believe that the article provides valuable information about a notable Pakistani singer, music director, and producer.

While I understand that the article may have been previously deleted, I would like to highlight that significant changes and additions have been made to address the reasons for its deletion. The article now contains more detailed information about Ayaz Sheikh's career, education, and references from reliable sources.

I kindly request the community to review the article again and consider allowing it to remain on Wikipedia. If there are any specific concerns or improvements that need to be made, I am more than willing to work on them collaboratively.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Syed Shaveer (talk) 15:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft was declined at least twice. The article was deleted earlier today via AfD (which you apparently kept removing the tag from) and you recreated it within an hour of the deletion. Do you have a conflict of interest with Ayaz Sheikh? If so, it is mandatory that you disclose your COI. Repeatedly recreating deleted articles is disruptive. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 15:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please note that recreating deleted pages is considered disruptive behavior, as @ThaddeusSholto already mentioned above. I nominated the article for deletion once more, and I do not expect a different outcome. Broc (talk) 20:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayaz Sheikh for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayaz Sheikh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayaz Sheikh (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Broc (talk) 20:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayaz Sheikh[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ayaz Sheikh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayaz Sheikh. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 09:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel I suggest letting the Wikipedia page stay because there haven't been significant changes, and there are plenty of references. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel I suggest letting the Ayaz Sheikh page stay because there haven't been significant changes, and there are plenty of references. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel Because nothing much has been written. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel The notice can be removed. When further references are available, it will be reinstated. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel I take responsibility for this matter, and there will be no promotional content added to it in any form. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel my request and request as well because this is an artist's page, and we should support artists. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel If you permit me, I can remove the notice. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Cryptic 09:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cryptic I will not edit Ayaz Sheikh's page or any other page against policy. This is my statement. Please unblock me. Ayaz Sheikh does not seem to be related to me. Apologies to all editors. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked - despite the irritatingly-unnecessary pings - and I'm going to hold you to that. —Cryptic 09:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cryptic Thanks, love you so much for unblocking me. Can you be my Wikipedia teacher because I am very interested in working on Wikipedia? There are various informative things like research on it. :) Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the temperament for it. You've been pointed at the WP:Teahouse before; I suggest asking there. —Cryptic 09:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cryptic Thank you for the suggestion. I will seek guidance at the WP:Teahouse. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cryptic And I will try to continue working with Wikipedia and keep learning from the work. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cryptic This is my statement, please unblock my account edit Thanks. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cryptic I don't have so much spare time to work on Ayaz Sheikh's page. Thank you. I have other tasks to work on Wikipedia. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent pinging[edit]

Please don't pester any editor by repeatedly pinging them, as you did seven times in succession for Wikishovel and which you have now done five times for Cryptic. If you continue to do it is likely that you will be blocked from editing again, with your ability to edit this page removed. JBW (talk) 09:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JBW Understood, will refrain from repeated pinging. Thank you for the reminder. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW I didn't mean to break Wikipedia rules. Thanks. Syed Shaveer (talk) 09:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To refrain from repeated pinging, you will need to stop adding the person's name to the beginning of each message. Keep in mind that experienced editors often don't need a ping after the first one in a section, because they will click "subscribe" or will add the page to their watchlist. –Novem Linguae (talk) 03:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Novem Linguae Thanking for the guidance and acknowledging understanding not to repeat the name in messages. Syed Shaveer (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanking, Understanding, Appreciating. Syed Shaveer (talk) 15:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subject: Discrepancy in Momal Sheikh's Birth Date on English and Urdu Wikipedia Pages[edit]

Hi everyone,

I noticed that there is a discrepancy in the birth date listed on the English and Urdu Wikipedia pages for Momal Sheikh. Here are the links to both pages for reference:

- English Wikipedia: [Momal Sheikh - English](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momal_Sheikh) - Urdu Wikipedia: [مومل شیخ - Urdu](https://ur.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D9%88%D9%85%D9%84_%D8%B4%DB%8C%D8%AE)

I wanted to bring this to your attention and discuss how we can ensure accuracy and consistency across both pages. Thank you. Syed Shaveer (talk) 15:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TCAS Incident Over Somalia (2024) (March 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

There may be potential for an article on this indecent, but it would be easier to start from scratch.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TCAS Incident Over Somalia (2024) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 22:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stuartyeates Thank you for your feedback. I'll start from scratch and work on creating a new article on the TCAS Incident Over Somalia (2024). Syed Shaveer (talk) 04:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Solar Flare Triggers Radio Blackout Over Australia[edit]

The article Solar Flare Triggers Radio Blackout Over Australia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ A412 ^talk! 20:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Solar Flare Triggers Radio Blackout Over Australia[edit]

The article Solar Flare Triggers Radio Blackout Over Australia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There are about 2,000 M-class flares like this one per 11-year solar cycle (see SWPC scales). This was an unremarkable event that does not need to have a dedicated article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Solar Flare Triggers Radio Blackout Over Australia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solar Flare Triggers Radio Blackout Over Australia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar Flare Triggers Radio Blackout Over Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ A412 ^talk! 21:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024 TCAS incident over Somalia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 TCAS incident over Somalia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 TCAS incident over Somalia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aviationwikiflight (talk) 10:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Assessment of Potential TikTok Ban in the United States[edit]

The article Assessment of Potential TikTok Ban in the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violates WP:ESSAY but not A7 eligable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 14:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will work on improving the article to ensure it meets Wikipedia's guidelines and addresses the concerns raised. I will also engage in discussion on the article's talk page to resolve any issues. Please consider withdrawing the proposed deletion notice Syed Shaveer (talk) 14:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayaz Sheikh[edit]

Hello, Syed Shaveer,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Chaotic Enby and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Ayaz Sheikh, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 22:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And blocked again. Did you think we wouldn't notice? —Cryptic 22:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're thinking incorrectly. Wikipedia has numerous editors, and each editor knows what they are doing. Instead of deleting your article, you could have asked me for the reason. It was my first article on Wikipedia that I made for the first time. It's my habit to correct anything that goes wrong or gets deleted for the first time, which may cause insult. Even if it takes time to do so. Thank you. Syed Shaveer (talk) 23:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: that you made for the fourth time. It's not about "being more careful", there's a point where it's genuinely not productive anymore. And your previous unblock was contingent on not recreating it at all, not "being more careful" like you're promising now. If you hope for an unblock (probably through the Wikipedia:Standard offer in six months), your best bet is to outline how you wish to contribute to the encyclopedia and which articles you plan to edit/create (which, again, should not include Ayaz Sheikh). Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby I understand the concerns and acknowledge my past mistakes. Moving forward, I am committed to abiding by Wikipedia's guidelines and contributing positively to the platform. I plan to focus on editing and creating articles that align with Wikipedia's policies, and I will not include Ayaz Sheikh in any future edits or creations. Thank you for your guidance, and I look forward to the opportunity to contribute constructively to Wikipedia in the future. Syed Shaveer (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be honest, did you write this answer using ChatGPT? I do not want you to restate a commitment/promise, I'm looking for you to explain, more precisely, what you actually want to edit/contribute to, and how you will do it. That should be needed to convince an unblocking administrator that you'll be editing constructively. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 00:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby I am a journalist and i focus more on news, i might work on an article if it seems suitable, i will start working on that article now, and the whole world is using ChatGPT now and this is not a new thing, this strengthens grammar, if you think it shouldn't be used, let me know. Syed Shaveer (talk) 00:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's a difference between making grammar checks, and having an AI write an entire apology message for you. Also, several of your articles such as Solar Flare Triggers Radio Blackout Over Australia appear to be written like they belong in newspapers rather than in an encyclopedia. Do you understand why they are not the same, and what an article needs to belong here?
Again, I am not able to unblock you. Your best bet is to appeal your block to an administrator by adding {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of the page, but you will need to provide evidence that you understand why your previous contributions weren't suitable for Wikipedia, and what you will do differently in the future. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 01:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby I understand the difference between making grammar checks and having an AI write a complete apology message. Also, I acknowledge the concern about articles like 'Solar Flare Triggers Radio Blackout Over Australia' potentially sounding more like newspaper articles rather than encyclopedia entries. Encyclopedia articles need to maintain a specific tone, depth, and structure distinct from news articles. I appreciate the feedback and recognize the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines to ensure that contributions are suitable for an encyclopedia. Syed Shaveer (talk) 02:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, stop using a robot to reply for you. That shows absolutely zero sincerity or understanding from you, which is what an administrator will be looking for when reviewing your block (if you end up requesting an unblock). Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 02:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby Alright i appeal to you and the administration to unblock me please don't mind dear. Syed Shaveer (talk) 02:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, you need to use the unblock template (see above), otherwise administrators won't see you. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 02:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby How can I use the template when there's an editing block? Syed Shaveer (talk) 02:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Put it here at the bottom of your talk page. You can still edit it. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 02:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby What should I put here? Please guide me correctly. Syed Shaveer (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to the bottom of the page, replacing Your reason here by your reason for being unblocked. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 03:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Syed Shaveer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I kindly request Wikipedia to consider unblocking my user account. I am committed to maintaining careful attention to detail in creating pages and ensuring that any previous errors are not repeated. I pledge to refrain from causing any further inconvenience to the Wikipedia team. Syed Shaveer (talk) 04:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. I see in what you have said no evidence that you understand what was unacceptable about your editing, and won't do the same again. I see only signs that you are trying hard to say things which you think will make a good impression. I also see no acknowledgement of your past dishonesty. My advice to you is not to make another unblock request for at least six months, and not even then unless you can indicate that you really do understand the reasons for the block. I also advise you that posting more unblock requests which don't address the reasons for the block is likely to result in your being blocked from editing this page, to prevent waste of administrators' time. JBW (talk) 10:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Syed Shaveer (talk) 04:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry if I've caused you any disturbance. Please don't take it badly. Syed Shaveer (talk) 03:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby And right now I'm not giving you responses through a robot because I prefer this conversational style, which is just how I am. I hope you don't mind. Syed Shaveer (talk) 02:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby I am ready to answer all your questions. You can ask me if you have any questions in mind. Syed Shaveer (talk) 00:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby Whether I work on Wikipedia or not doesn't matter to me. I wanted to work on Wikipedia because it's related to my field. I am not working on Wikipedia with the intention of making money or benefiting financially, but rather because I want to contribute and improve it. and I can further learn. Therefore, i request the Wikipedia team to kindly unblock my user account as soon as possible. Thank you. Syed Shaveer (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I created this page again so that I can make changes to it. My goal will always be to recreate any page that gets deleted, so that I can correct mistakes in every article. Thanks. Syed Shaveer (talk) 22:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I request that you don't block me like this. I want to work on a daily basis and I am doing so. Please unblock me, I will be more careful next time, and before recreating any deleted page, I will contact the administrator. Syed Shaveer (talk) 23:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby Kindly consider unblocking my Wikipedia User account. Appreciate your assistance. Syed Shaveer (talk) 23:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the one who blocked you, and, as I am not an administrator, I cannot unblock you. Furthermore, your block was for a very good reason: you promised to not recreate Ayaz Sheikh as a condition for your previous unblock, and you broke that promise. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby Yes, I had made a promise, but I double promise you that I will be more careful next time. Syed Shaveer (talk) 23:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a platform where one can learn a lot and feel great by contributing and working on it. Syed Shaveer (talk) 23:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Syed Shaveer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please consider unblocking my account. I assure you that any misunderstanding will not occur again, and I will adhere to all community guidelines diligently. Thank you. Syed Shaveer (talk) 05:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, nor does it explain why we can trust your word, now that you've shown we cannot trust your promises. Yamla (talk) 09:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll also note that you say, above, "My goal will always be to recreate any page that gets deleted". That precludes any possibility you'll be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 09:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Syed Shaveer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please assist me, kindly. I created a page on Wikipedia, which was subsequently denied by Wikipedia. I wish to understand and am committed to resolving this issue. I am making every effort to abide by Wikipedia's guidelines and contribute positively to the community. Kindly grant me permission to be unblocked so that I can contribute positively. Thank you.

Accept reason:

Your reason for accepting Syed Shaveer (talk) 10:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I see that while I was writing my message above, you were posting a fake administrator accepted unblock request, presumably imagining that it would unblock you. Obviously I will remove your ability to edit this page, and obviously the likelihood of any administrator ever unblocking you must now be close to zero. Do you think we are idiots? JBW (talk) 11:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where'd he get that?! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: I guess copied from the talk page of an editor who had been unblocked. JBW (talk) 20:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: That just sounds surprisingly sophisticated to me. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. JBW (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you were worried that the likelihood of your ever being unblocked was not quite close enough to zero, then congratulations on finding a highly effective way of pushing it even closer to zero, by making a blatantly obvious attempt to evade the block, using another account. JBW (talk) 21:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]