User talk:Deepfriedokra

If anyone claims to be my "doppelganger" or "clone," please block on sight
If you need page protection, please report at WP:RfPP

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Start a new discussion thread

User talk:Deepfriedokra/archives

If you're around[edit]

Muhammad Ahmad Raza was pretty quickly recreated after you deleted it for G11 - the sandbox page at User:ARQ Ahmad/sandbox is also left standing. If I could delete them myself, I would. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:12, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Schrödinger's jellyfish: Deleted again and recreated again while I slept. Please feel free to tag it for deletion yet again (WP:G11 and WP:A7). Might want to report @ARQ Ahmad: at WP:AIV as a spam-only account. ("Sleep that knits up the raveled sleave of care" The Scottish Play") Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Annh07: was kind enough to tag and warn. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think it is necessary. They continued to create inappropriate pages despite being warned. Annh07 (talk) 06:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You declined the submission in the same moment I declined it![edit]

Don't worry, it is just curious. Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 20:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great minds think alike -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminds me of the Big Nate book having that name. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 21:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My username[edit]

Thinking of changing to "DeepCeruleanShuriken". -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

or "DandelionFuzzOasis" -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

, , , don' get no respect -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have the utmost respect for you, and trolls like that be damned. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din.[edit]

I confess that I wouldn't have considered extending any assumption of good faith to the skyscraper fan with a troublesome brother, but having thought about it, I think you were right to do so. JBW (talk) 11:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: Thanks. The editing pattern looked plasible. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of article for Ndukwe Uche[edit]

Hello. I created an article for author and engineer Ndukwe Uche. I was curious as to why it was rejected and subsequently deleted. His 3 books all have ISBN numbers so I'm wondering what I should do to get this article approved and reverse the deletion. Thanks. Bernieuche (talk) 02:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bernieuche:please read the messages on your talk page. Please follow the links in the deletion notice. The content was inadequately sourced and promotional in tone. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page[edit]

/* Deleted page */ I had my page that was created earlier today, deleted. I was wondering how I could get it back or at least get the information from the draft back. Im having a tricky time navigating where to get help in this issue as the links dont seem to take me to the right places. I was lead to this page to ask for help. Any ideas would be great! Magdalena Wosinska (talk) 05:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Magdalena Wosinska: emailed -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SMS Handover[edit]

I think I must have missed something. Why would we want to restore the deleted revisions? Deb (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Undelete/User_talk:SMSHandover Not much there, just CSD notice. Guess we can live without it. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's such blatant advertising that I can't see any reason to undelete it. I still feel like I'm missing something... Deb (talk) 08:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would have blanked and revdel'd the ad and left the warning that was the first post. If there is meaningful content on a user talk page, I remove and revdel the spam. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(This revision) -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I get it now. I thought you wanted to undelete it all, including the promotional wording. Deb (talk) 11:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:SusanneCorner79[edit]

Just an FYI, that account is a spambot, so the point of no advertising is unlikely to get across to them. meta:NTSAMR has some more info. v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 01:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If they don't get the message, I have other ways of communication.😜 -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you would fancy blocking one, User:SpencerVirtue08 v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 01:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

G-locked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Micnaem/sandbox[edit]

Please delete the contents of "User:Micnaem/sandbox" for me. Thanks Micnaem (talk) 08:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you deleted my draft...how can I at least save my work for myself ???[edit]

Hi, you deleted my draft article on "Yamaha Recording Custom" (why I find a big article on Fender Stratocaster Guitars published while mine is rejected is still unclear, but ok !)

However I put a hughe effort in my draft and the draft is now gone ! I was not given the opportunity to save my work for my self. Can you pls advice if there is a way to save my work for myself ?

Regards, Marcus Opa munster (talk) 07:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Opa munster: Looks like I declined the draft after is was tagged for WP:G11. (Courtesy ping @Bbb23:). As I noted in the decline, it lacked sufficient coverage to meet imclusion requirements for an encyclopedia article. Please reread that and any other declines you have received for more information. The deleting admin was @Seraphimblade:. Nevertheless, I will email you the latest version before the decline and w/o the CSD tag. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two barnstars for you![edit]

		The Admin's Barnstar
		For your admin work. Great job! Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 11:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		You've been defending the wiki for 365 or 366 straight days (since April 22 of last year), whereas my streak is only 117 days😔. I'm hoping to beat you one day, but we'll have to wait and see. Oh, don't be offended by what that editor said on April 6; it's all part of the process, I suppose. Let's see if you can reach a 1,000 days! Bye. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 11:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anpang01[edit]

Just to inform you: Meta:Steward requests/Username changes#Anpang01. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer: I don't like usurps, but to each their own. The request is banging unto the unblock conditions, but I guess the user names are close enough as not to be obfuscation or evading scrutiny. So, I guess so. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See, Special:Permalink/1015596261. User:Anpang redirects to User:VoidUBX, and Anpang01 edited User:VoidUBX. [1] – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weird. An undisclosed sock? Ack -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that seems to be the case. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to check their new reply on the Meta rename request. – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer: Not sure they violated their unblock conditions, but this sure is weird. @Anpang01: This sure is weird. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Admin eyes[edit]

I just had a very weird encounter I wanted to bring to your attention. You might recall the interactions during this sockpuppet investigation that included me being hounded by a particular IP, to the degree that you put in a partial block for them from my talkpage. A new account with whom I've never before interacted, and who has only been around for a week, referenced all of that in some detail here while making a personal attack. I'm not sure what to ask for, exactly, other than for an admin familiar with the previous situation to be aware. It's a very peculiar and specific thing for a week-old account to know about. Grandpallama (talk) 01:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser needed vs duck. Harasser sounds like needing sock block. (I'm asleep.) -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know about a link to that particular SPI, will need to do a bit more digging to establish that, but they are undoubtedly evading a block on this account, so yeah - indeffed. Girth Summit _(blether) 07:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: Thou art kind. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both. It was just disconcerting (and suspicious) to see a reference about my edit history like that from a new account. Grandpallama (talk) 15:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Grandpallama: Congratulations. You've done your job so well, you pissed off a blocked user who socked to express their ire. Keep up the good work. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a barnstar for being sock chum? :) Grandpallama (talk) 16:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sock chum is award enough for me. I haven't been trolled on Wiki in a while. (sigh). There is a deranged individual on UTRS who will probably see this and respond there. 😜 -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck. I suspect responding to UTRS is probably just as thankless as CU work at SPI. I don't think those admins who spend their time with these sorts of less transparent tasks get enough credit for volunteering their personal time in such endeavors, but thank you for what you do. Grandpallama (talk) 20:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]