User talk:AgentCody

Powerful Karma, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Powerful Karma! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajasree M. S has been accepted

Rajasree M. S, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

─ The Aafī ^(talk) 18:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: M.R. Saseendranath has been accepted

M.R. Saseendranath, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:04, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gopinath Ravindran has been accepted

Gopinath Ravindran, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 14:15, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yogesh Singh has been accepted

Yogesh Singh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: V. Anil Kumar has been accepted

V. Anil Kumar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Abraham V. M for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abraham V. M is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham V. M until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

VV 11:20, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

When you are a major contributor to an article and it is tagged for improvement, please do not remove the templates. Let another editor see if the issue mentioned in the template has been addressed and then let them remove it. Best! VV 11:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey VV, you are correct. I actually first went to your talk page to discuss this but then it was written you are on a break. Ideally, of course, I would not remove it myself. But this is pretty black and white. There is no ambiguity on notability here as per my experience with WP:Academic. The ambiguity that usually happens in this criteria is if the university is well established or not. Christ University is surely well established. I noticed your point on only being press releases used as citations. I am not aware if criteria 6 forbids it. Nonetheless, I have added two more non-PR sources that verifies this. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:27, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

You've placed notability tags, as per WP:Academic, Vice Chancelors of major universities in commonwealth countries are notable. Nomadicghumakkad mentioned the same. WP:NACADEMIC#6 states The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society. Powerful Karma (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

photos on commons

Hi! Are the photos you uploaded to Commons photos you personally took? If no, please read the guidelines around them. Thanks. VV 18:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I'm the copyright owner of those photos. Powerful Karma (talk) 01:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks. VV 04:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Anu Singh Lather for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anu Singh Lather is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anu Singh Lather until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CeltJungleSnake (talk) 07:14, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

File mover

As I just realized my response might come across as being a bit harsh, please know you are free to re-request the right when you have a demonstrable need. The rights that can be requested at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions are only granted to users who have a clear and present need for them because they require experience with policy and editing to be used right. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 04:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

That's alright!! Thanks Powerful Karma (talk) 05:23, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Sangeeta Shrivastava

You created a wikilink to Sangeeta Shrivastava in the article on the University of Allahabad. I know that there have been news stories about her - apparently she sleeps badly because her house is too close to the mosque.[1] Please could you write an article about her.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:10, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

10/27/10 Imperial Russia

USERNAME (talk)

WikiQuiz 10/27/10 Imperial Russia Answer Sheet

Question	Answer
1	ANSWER 4
2	2
3	1
4	1
5	4
6	4
7	1
8	1
9	1
10	3

Powerful Karma (talk) 02:50, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Help with Malyalam

Hey, I figured that you know the language. I am trying to review one page [2] check here. Can you see the sources in Malyalam and tell me if they are all same (or rewrites of each other)? Will appreciate if you can support. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 06:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Nomadicghumakkad, all the sources given in Malayalam are same. (All states she is one among the millionaires in India) Powerful Karma (talk) 06:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello there

I came across this. Do not be dissuaded, we all went through everything you seeming to be going through as of now, it’s all part of the learning curve and in time all would turn out good for you as long as you keep up the good work you are currently doing. Celestina007 (talk) 01:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Celestina007, for your good words. Made my day. Thanks again. Regards, Powerful Karma (talk) 01:58, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Whenever you need help just let me know and id be there to assist you. Celestina007 (talk) 04:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Venugopal K R

Hello, Powerful Karma,

Thank you for creating Venugopal K R.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

more information is required for this article to meet the requirements of WP:PROF. Kindly consider the requirements of [WP:NACADEMIC]]. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 11:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Venugopal K R is the Vice-chancellor of Bangalore University. Vice chancellors of major Universities are notable enough as per WP:NACADEMIC#6. See The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society. Powerful Karma (talk) 11:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Welcome Back

Welcome back, I hope to see you around. Celestina007 (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you... Powerful Karma (talk) 01:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

globally renamed Powerful Karma to AgentCody

globally renamed Powerful Karma to AgentCody --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much. AgentCody (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

New or Experienced?

Hi. Hope that you are fine. I observed that you participated at this AfD which was nominated for deletion by me. Although your thoughts were right, it is a matter of surprise that despite joining Wikipedia just 15 days ago, you have known how to vote on an AfD discussion page. In this 15-20 days' time since creation of your account, you have voted on about 50 AfD discussion pages, or nominated for AfD. Besides, it also seems that you know a lot of Wikipedia's terminology, wiki-languages and how WP works, which is difficult for a brand new user. Would you like to declare if you have edited with any other account earlier? — A.A Prinon  ^{Leave a dialogue} 11:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Earlier I was an IP editor, during the year of 2017 - 2019. AgentCody 11:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Phoenix man per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix man. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ST47 (talk) 05:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AgentCody (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I strongly oppose your investigation. I don't have any connection with the User: Pheonix Man. Your investigation is utter wrong. I challenge you!! AgentCody 06:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

PhilKnight (talk) 04:36, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

You're not hidden on the internet

I'm not scaring you or anything, but based on your comments you don't seem to know what's happening. Your computer and your Internet connection have an Address, kind of like your phone number. There are "specific administrator" who have permissions to see that info for each user. If an account on a particular Device got blocked, and you create another account on that device/ or that wifi/internet Connection , Wikipedia knows its still you. Not based on your name. But based on Internet statistics. You're not hidden on the internet. And you're just making the case for your unbanning even worse by creating accounts.

The admins have proof that Phoenixman and Your account share a phone/Computer. Or if you're connecting over Wifi, they know that Phoenixman and you shared the same router. You're banned based on Proof. Not based on your name being "Sharat", that's just suspicion to start this Internet investigation.

 Daiyusha (talk) 06:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)