User talk:OnlineGamesExpert
Hello, OnlineGamesExpert, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
Additional Welcome![edit]
The link to the more "meaty" tutorial is below, on the left. Below that is the Wikipedia Adventure, which I would recommend trying first.
Welcome OnlineGamesExpert!
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}} on your userpage.Sincerely, Quinto Simmaco (talk) 12:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
|
Hi OnlineGamesExpert!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! This message was delivered by Quinto Simmaco (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC) |
The article MonsterMMORPG has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
A few comments for you[edit]
- sign your posts to talk pages, per the instructions just above.
- please read WP:OTHERSTUFF - just because some other page survived, does not mean that yours should too, or conversely because yours was deleted that the other should also be deleted.
- I reviewed several of the pages you linked, and while some do seem like legitimate cases for deletion, others were clearly notable, and therefore you need to take a bit more care in terms of who you are comparing yourself to.
- I cannot see the page of yours that was deleted, so I can offer no opinion as to how your page compares.
- For the pages that you do legitabmetly think need deletion, spamming links onto an admin's page is not the appropriate process to get them deleted. Try a speedy delete, a prod, or an AFD submission. please see Wikipedia:How_to_delete_a_page
- But I think that you do not actually want all those pages deleted. You are just trying to make a WP:POINT. Please read that article as well. Note that making a point in this manner is specifically identified as being disruptive, and can lead to a block or ban on your ability to edit.
- If you have specific questions about a particular source, then ask that question. People are willing to help, but only if you help yourself first.
Gaijin42 (talk) 21:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
MonsterMMORPG images[edit]
You need to properly donate them to avoid having them deleted. The only valid way to put them out here and not eventually get them deleted is to go through the Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team, confirm that you are who you say you are, and release them into the public domain which would let anyone do anything they wanted with your images, without even telling you what they're doing. You can read more information at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials but basically you have to include the text from Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries in an email which has the images attached, send that email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org then upload the file to Wikimedia Commons and place {{OTRS pending}} on the image page. Then someone will contact you. The images might still be deleted, though, although that would be someone else's decision and they can talk to you more about that. If you'd like any further help, contact me on my user talk page or put a {{help me}} template up on your own user talk page and someone will be along to help you. :) Banaticus (talk) 21:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of MonsterMMORPG for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MonsterMMORPG is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonsterMMORPG until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
MonsterMMORPG Article[edit]
The opening paragraph needs to be expanded. Maybe an extra 3 lines? Adamdaley (talk) 00:36, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Reliable sources[edit]
The Wikipedia Video games project keeps a list of video game based sources that have been discussed and either accepted or rejected. You can see the list here WP:VG/S and you can ask about, or propose, unlisted sources here WT:VG/S. Hope this helps. - X201 (talk) 12:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Messages[edit]
Message added 13:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your submission at Articles for creation: MonsterMMORPG has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Oo7565 (talk) 06:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)|
|
Hi OnlineGamesExpert!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! This message was delivered by Quinto Simmaco (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for April 10[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of massively multiplayer online role-playing games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PVP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Conflict of interest at MonsterMMORPG[edit]
Hello, OnlineGamesExpert. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article MonsterMMORPG, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 01:15, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of MonsterMMORPG[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on MonsterMMORPG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Primefac (talk) 10:45, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
MonsterMMORPG[edit]
Hi, firstly, please don't spam dozens of admins with this topic, because we're all probably going to look into this independently and take a lot of time to have a look at it (as User:Everymorning has already done). My take is that the deletion is probably technically invalid, but I have to ask what your connection is to the subject of the article? Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:20, 11 April 2015 (UTC). Lankiveil (speak to me) Thank you very much for reply. Do my connection really matters here? I mean ignore me and evaluate article from that view right? Completely neutrality. Thank you very much again. Ah also i did not receieve any alert about User:Everymorning replied any idea?
April 2015[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)- Apparently, your only interest in editing here is to promote a game with which you're affiliated. You have repeatedly recreated the game, and each time it has been deleted. There was even a deletion discussion, the consensus of which was delete. After that, you created it yet again and it was speedy deleted and salted. Since that delete, you have plastered the Talk pages of administrators and other editors with the same disingenuous question "why was it deleted", even though almost all of these editors have absolutely nothing to do with the deleted article. You are obviously not interested in making positive contributions to this project, and this has been going on for years. I have therefore blocked you indefinitely.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
OnlineGamesExpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First only 1 time deleted page which was composed by me. This last time it was draft and was simply composed by editors who approved. And article should be evaluated anonymously not by the person who composes. It was an editor acceptance yet deleted speedily. Is this make sense? I mean editor approves but it get deleted immediately. Also i did not harass anybody and my aim is here to expand Wikipedia. OnlineGamesExpert (talk) 13:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I absolutely agree with the blocking admin. There is no indication that you are here to help in the building of the encyclopedia. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:31, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Two questions. First, you don't think that posting all those messages on user talk pages constitutes harassment? Second, why are you here other than to promote this game? I don't see you doing anything else, and you've been here on and off since 2012.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- user:Bbb23 Well my submission are being kept deleted and I am extremely discouraged to make any further. Last time I followed appropriate steps and submission speedily deleted. Draft-Get help from chat-Once chat says ready submit draft- and the rest is article accepted by editors. And my ignorance is I am asking at the chat that article is why heavily modified. If I did not mention in chat, It will not be tagged deletation and will not get deleted because It was approved and edited by User:Woodroar OnlineGamesExpert (talk) 13:36, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- user:Bbb23 First are there any rule that prevents users to contact admins about an issue? If so it is my ignorancy that i did not know. Second is my interest does really matter while an article is being published or not? I mean wikipedia is an encyclopedia and all submissions must be evaluated as submitted Anonymously . And i would say that this speedy deletation was a complete insult to User:Woodroar. He/she tried best, spent time, modified article and accepted. Also what is the purpose of chat and draft? OnlineGamesExpert (talk) 13:43, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I didn't "approve" anything. I removed the blatant policy/guideline violations, referred you (again) to information about finding reliable sources, and cautioned you against editing the article as you have admitted to be involved. I did say on the Talk page that the article would "probably" survive a deletion discussion this time, but that's only because of the many non-English sources which are difficult for non-English-reading editors to properly evaluate. It was in no way an endorsement of the article. Woodroar (talk) 13:47, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- I totally get the point now. It is not about neutrality but all about history of the article composer. I am 100% sure if this article was created by someone else, it would be accepted and left thereOnlineGamesExpert (talk) 13:53, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
OnlineGamesExpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am terribly sorry for my aggressive contacting behavior and other incorrect actions. I got my lesson and will not make such events ever again. I apologize for my unacceptable actions and apologize from everybody that I have harassed. I just want to have a second chance. OnlineGamesExpert (talk) 23:15, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Under the circumstances, a Standard Offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 19:45, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MonsterMMORPG[edit]
Our processes don't actually require discussion, or personal notification to you, in all cases before a deletion can be undertaken — we have numerous criteria by which an administrator is allowed to immediately delete an article on sight without initiating any discussion or notification first, and unfortunately "recreation of a previously deleted article without substantive improvement" is one of those criteria. I also wasn't sure why you were bringing this to my attention, since I had nothing to do with the deletion whatsoever, but now I see that you just spammed every administrator you could find — but that's not the appropriate process for questioning or challenging a speedy deletion.
We do have processes by which a speedy deletion can be reviewed — namely, the article gets restored and then taken to a full AFD instead to establish a wider consensus one way or the other — but if that's what you want, you do it by politely raising your request with the administrator who performed the deletion, and only them, rather than by shopping around for every administrator you can find. And because you approached it the way you did, and already got userblocked for it, I'm not willing to get involved any further. If another admin is actually willing to take this on for you, then more power to them — but unfortunately I don't think that's very likely here given the way you approached this, and it's definitely not going to be me. Bearcat (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- I am sorry about the behaviour i displayed. I was extremely frustrated. Yes i would like to have full AFD. User:Bearcat OnlineGamesExpert (talk) 15:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OnlineGamesExpert. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:45, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- user:Tokyogirl79 I can not reply any other page than this which means I also can not reply here [1]. Also just to mention I have no alternate account etc. Anyway my request to unblock still awaits. It seems like discussion of my article will be removed until I get a chance to reply. OnlineGamesExpert (talk) 14:45, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Your use of to evade your block to continue canvass|spam other editors' pages will increase the risk that your wait for unblocking may become indefinite.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:29, 17 April 2015 (UTC)