User talk:David O. Johnson

I think you should remove candidates who have not qualified for any debate at all from the 2020 Democratic presidential primary debates page, as they are not really "major" since even most politically engaged people have never heard of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.96.191.88 (talk) 15:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the Polling Sections of 2020 Iowa Caucuses, 2020 New Hampshire Primary, 2020 Nevada Caucuses, and 2020 South Carolina Primary This candidate is irrelevant in polling; did not previously mention Kirsten Gillibrand, John Hickenlooper, Bill de Blasio, Tim Ryan, etc. withdrawals! I don't think we should mention this candidate without including the others; I don't think we should clutter the page with every candidate that withdraws.

2020 Democratic Primary-Timeline: Needs to add Jan. 10, 2020 deadline for seventh debate — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:484:C580:3F40:656B:E0B8:AF70:DD70 (talk) 18:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Reform and Development Party, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:54, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Revolutionary Democratic Coalition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political parties in Egypt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nasserist Party[edit]

Hi David, I was looking at your RM at Talk:Nasserist Party (Egypt) and couldn't quite understand what you wanted. Are the Arab Democratic Nasserist Party and the Nasserist Party different parties? If not, it's fine to have both Nasserist Party and Nasserist Party (Egypt) as redirects to Arab Democratic Nasserist Party. Thanks, BDD (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I may have read too quickly. It sounds like you're saying there is a new Nasserist Party that's different from the ADNP, so it shouldn't redirect there. Is that right? --BDD (talk) 16:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The new Nasserist Party page that I started is no longer available, so I don't really know what to do. The new party wasn't competing for seats [each party can join whatever electoral alliance they want for the upcoming election], so I think someone removed the page I created and reverted the redirect from the disambiguation page to to the old page for the ADNP. David O. Johnson (talk) 18:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see what happened. Your article shouldn't've been made into a redirect without discussion. For now, I think your article should be separate; eventually, we may want to merge the ADNP into it, depending on what happens in the future, and we will want to move it to Nasserist Party. I think that's what you originally wanted. --BDD (talk) 19:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is correct. Thank you. I will go ahead and recreate the Nasserist Party page under Nasserist Party (Egypt) later on. I suppose there should be a way to differentiate the two parties with similar names. Thanks again. David O. Johnson (talk) 22:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard my last comment. I can see you restored the article I created. Thank you. David O. Johnson (talk) 23:09, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hossam Badrawi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This notice means that the link to the Union Party disambiguation page should be fixed by changing it to a link direct to the appropriate page, like Union Party (Egypt). LittleBen (talk) 07:30, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have done that already.David O. Johnson (talk) 07:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added extra info. about hatnotes here. Several useful ones are listed for my reference near the top of my user page. LittleBen (talk) 07:36, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you view the history tab you will see that User:ukexpat kindly fixed the problem. LittleBen (talk) 16:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

District6[edit]

Just so you know, a space between District and 6 would have fixed the problem equally as well. 184.78.81.245 (talk) 17:47, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Safety and Development Party, David O. Johnson!

Wikipedia editor Go Phightins! just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

marking as reviewed; good start

To reply, leave a comment on Go Phightins!'s talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Syrian civil war[edit]

Please stop removing the double-dividers from the Syrian civil war infobox. They are there as an interim solution for an ongoing content dispute, and your removals may seem disruptive. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 22:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies.David O. Johnson (talk) 22:46, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political parties in Egypt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shoura Council Members[edit]

Could you add your information about the Shoura Council Composition to its Article in Shura Council?--Chauahuasachca (talk) 10:48, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add it later; this article is still being updated constantly. http://www.egyptindependent.com/news/update-islamists-and-old-regime-men-morsy-s-shura-council-appointments David O. Johnson (talk) 20:42, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added the seats that I am aware of; I just put them in a list for now. David O. Johnson (talk) 22:23, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Egyptian constitutional referendum, 2012[edit]

On 27 December 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Egyptian constitutional referendum, 2012, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 04:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nubian Nile Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nubian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Islamist Jihadi Party[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Islamist Jihadi Party, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Egaqu (talk) 19:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Islamist Jihadi Party[edit]

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Islamist Jihadi Party has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it's not a hoax, but a single reference to someone as the founder of a party is not enough to show importance or significance. By all means re-create if you can find more, remembering that while a "credible assertion of significance or importance" is enough to avoid speedy deletion, if an article is to be kept it will need to pass the WP:GNG. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:32, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abu Mohammad al-Golani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syrian uprising (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abu Iyadh al-Tunisi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abu Iyadh al-Tunisi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 05:33, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to S-300 (missile) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves[edit]

Hello David. Well done for spotting that the next Lebanese general election has had its date changed, but when you move articles like that, can you make sure to update the templates on it too? You neglected to update {{Lebanese elections}}, which still showed the date as 2013. Usually the Politics of... templates have future elections on too, but the Lebanese one seems to be an exception. Cheers, Number 5 7 15:27, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make sure to do that next time. Thanks for the info. David O. Johnson (talk) 15:29, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ghuraba Al-Sham[edit]

Hi, it seems that Lothar von Richthofen is engaging again in an edit war at the Ghuraba Al-Sham article, removing any editions pointing to the dubiousness of his claim of former alliances of that group with the Syrian intelligence while simultaneously claim that the group is no longer allied with Al-Nusra Front. I had added again your last edit and the dubious tags, but I dont know how much they will stay like that. Im thinking also to add a NPOV tag if things continue like that. What do you think about this and what can we do? Regards,--HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you actually read the sources properly, it isn't "dubious" at all. See the article's talkpage for a lesson in reading comprehension. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 19:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, and then you talk about "aggressive behaviour", what an hypocrite...--HCPUNXKID (talk) 15:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I overhauled the article, adding sources where needed. Ghuraba al-Sham's former alliance with the Al Nusra Front is well-documented, as are links with Syrian intelligence. David O. Johnson (talk) 20:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scream Bloody Gore may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Hard Rock Magazine|url=http://www.emptywords.org/HardRock03-2002.htm|accessdate=May 11, 2011)}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo of Egyptian Patriotic Movement.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Egyptian Patriotic Movement.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TemplateData is here[edit]

Hey David O. Johnson

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic formatting[edit]

If you check the guidelines for the Syrian civil war template it recommends being concise. You are doing the opposite of that. Please stop cluttering the infobox. Thanks. Pass a Method talk 08:32, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Next Egyptian presidential election for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Egyptian presidential election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Egyptian presidential election until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William 22:58, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

In Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Egyptian presidential election, you've been signing your name on a new line instead of inline, which can make things hard to read sometimes. I've fixed this for you.

For future reference, an example of what you've been doing (and which I suggest you not do) is this (in wiki-formatting):

:comment.
~~~~

Instead, you should just write:

:comment. ~~~~

Thanks, Ansh666 06:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ghuraba al-Sham Front. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 04:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. You have new messages at Dusti's talk page.
Message added 04:54, 13 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dusti^*poke* 04:54, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

x2 Dusti^*poke* 05:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. You have new messages at Talk:Reza Aslan.
Message added 07:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Taha (talk) 07:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Egyptian Islamic Jihad may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

al-Zawahiri]] was "the on in front", Al-Sharif was the actual leader.<ref name="RebellionWright">[{{Cite news url=http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/06/02/080602fa_fact_wright?currentPage=all|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Egyptian Nazi Party for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egyptian Nazi Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian Nazi Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Soman (talk) 15:29, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Troika (Tunisia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ennahda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Islamic coalition (Syria) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{Cite news|title=Islamist Groups Declare Opposition to National Coalition and US Strategy [updated]]|url=http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/major-rebel-factions-drop-exiles-go-full-islamist/|agency=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:19, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal: United Revolutionary Front/Revolutionary Democratic Coalition[edit]

Hello David,

I have proposed to merge the articles Revolutionary Democratic Coalition and United Revolutionary Front, both created by you. You find my reasons for the proposal and the discussion at Talk:Revolutionary Democratic Coalition#Merger proposal. Please feel free to comment. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 17:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Catsimatidis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Catsimatidis to support SemGroup reorganization], [[Reuters]], July 20, 2009.</ref>]
with an estimated net worth of $3 billion, up from #634 and $2 billion the previous year).<ref>[http://www.forbes.com/profile/john-catsimatidis The World's Billionaires: John Catsimatidis].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National Liberation Army (Libya) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

between three and five years for Libya to field a capable enough army to protect its borders.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.zeenews.india.com/news/world/libya-army-chief-of-staff-wants-to-disarm-
news.php?action=view&id=726r The rebels handed over their weapons in Bayda](in Arabic). Binrabah (، 24 October 2011.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shia militants in the Syrian war[edit]

Yes, of course Shia militants are involved, like many other religious majorities and minorities, including Sunni, Christian, Alawite and Druz militants, are included in the militias loyal to the legitimate Syrian government. Hence -in my opinion- no need to mention the Shia militants group in the title of the column.--Zyzzzzzy (talk) 07:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wafa Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congress of the Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anti-Coup Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Watan Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

strikes to punish Syria’s regime for [[Ghouta chemical attack|using chemical weapons]], the [[Syrian Opposition Coalition|SOC] has become increasingly irrelevant."<ref>http://www.economist.com/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:48, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mamdouh Ismail may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

com/parties/view.aspx?id=1f65d1f1-e2c0-48c1-8fcf-df84e099ec83|title=Al-Salama wal Tanmeya Party: (Safety and Development Party|publisher=Aswat Masriya|date=6 December 2011|accessdate=8 December

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Civilization Party may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

org/2012/02/27/al-hadara-egyptian-civilization-party|title=Al-Hadara (Egyptian Civilization Party)]|publisher=Carnegie Endowment for International Peace|date=25 November 2012|accessdate=13 December

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:55, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Strong Egypt Party may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:29, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 constitution of egypt[edit]

hi can you create the articl ?--Principal adjoint (talk) 17:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I think we just at least wait to see if it passes in the referendum.David O. Johnson (talk) 17:20, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tunisian general election, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ennahda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Libyan Constituent Assembly election[edit]

Hi David. Thanks for adding a date to the election, but you recreated the article where the redirect was rather than moving the existing article. This causes all kinds of problems with regards to attributions. If you can't move a page, you need to use the WP:RM process, or if it's uncontroversial, just ask an admin like myself. Cheers, Number 5 7 13:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2013 revolution[edit]

Greetings, it would be great if you gave us your opinion on this discussion. Thanks. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Joe Miller (Alaska politician) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of armed groups in the Syrian Civil War may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

<br>{{flagicon|Syria|1932}} Liwaa Ansar al-Khilafa)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Egyptian Islamic Jihad may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

com/arabtimes/kuwait/Viewdet.asp?ID=8534&cat=a ‘Terror’ list out; Russia tags two Kuwaiti groups], ''[[Arab Times]]'', February 2003</ref>
10 January 2014}}</ref> [[Nabil Na'eem]] was the leader of the group from 1988 until 1992.<ref{{Cite news |title=Egyptian jihadist leader: Bin Laden blew himself up to avoid capture|url=http:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:25, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to President of Egypt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the recommendation of 20 members of the [[House of Representatives (Egypt)|House of Representatives)]] or the endorsement of 25,000 people across 15 governorates, with at least 1,000 signatures from
info/constitution-egypt-2012-translation/#ch-three-2 Article 151 in the Constitution of Egypt:)]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

language|Dutch]] | title='Meer erkenning oppositie Syrië' | date=10 December 2012 | publisher=[[NU.nl] |url=http://www.nu.nl/onrust-midden-oosten/2979204/meer-erkenning-oppositie-syrie.html |

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

On 21 November 2012, the Kurdish [[Democratic Union Party (Syria)|Democratic Union Party]] {PYD), which controls territory in the north of Syria, rejected the new coalition and criticised it for "
//www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2012/11/20121119195737909518.html|accessdate=2012-11-20}}</ref>><ref name=EU>[http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i-qVeEInoOTVkMbHe--041BmmeFw AFP

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:11, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Egyptian Revolution of 2013 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

group later that year in response to a [[December 2013 Mansoura bombing|bombing in Mansoura]] (though [[Ansar Bait al-Maqdis]] claimed responsibility<ref>{{cite web|url=http://english.ahram.org.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 constitution of egypt[edit]

hello, it is not a new --Panam2014 (talk) 21:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why remove archival information from references?[edit]

hi David, I fail to understand why you have systematically been removing archival information from references in at least these two edits that you made:

How can removal of archival information possibly improve the quality of an article? This is not just a luxury of "extra info". The verifiability of an online encylopedia depends mainly on external web pages. The history of the world wide web shows that sources can be volatile. Web pages that are interesting and useful and appear stable can and do disappear. Just because a source disappears does not imply that we should remove the corresponding information from the Wikipedia. Given that archival websites exist, archiving these makes our articles more verifiable in the long term. This still requires the reader to trust the archiving organisation, but that's easier than searching through a long edit history and then trusting a random Wikipedian's memory ("I remember I read the info justifying that sentence ten years ago at the time I edited, but I'm afraid I didn't store a snapshot"). Please see Web archiving for a general discussion and WebCite or List of Web archiving initiatives for some examples. Even mainstream newspaper websites are not necessarily stable in the long term. A newspaper might decide to require subscriptions for articles older than X years. Or the newspaper might close down in an economic crisis with nobody from the ex-newspaper making the effort (legal + hardware + software) to create a long-term web archive.

Unless you have a good reason from removing the archival information, I would suggest that you restore the deleted material.

(On a less fundamental point, I also fail to understand why you have removed reference labels from references that in a given version of an article are only cited once. If a reference is useful once, chances are that someone editing later may wish to cite the same reference for another relevant piece of information. The edit label can usually be guessed by clicking on the existing link to the reference - if the label already exists. Removing an existing label creates extra work for the later edit. The extra number of bytes is negligible in terms of download time compared to the main text. Conciseness is needed in the rendered text, not the source text. In any case, the archival information is a much more fundamental issue.)

Boud (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, regarding the archival information; I personally thought that it wasn't needed, though I currently understand the reasoning for keeping them intact. Regarding the reference names, you make a valid point. I will keep this in mind as I continue to edit articles. Thank you, David O. Johnson (talk) 01:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks :). Boud (talk) 18:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it is a new constitution[edit]

[1] --Panam2014 (talk) 11:57, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Ghuraba al-Sham[edit]

As I said before, the claim about Ghuraba al-Sham being allied with Syrian intel is just that, allegations (even the sources given talk about that, accusations, suggestions, allegations and claims, not facts). Some people also claim that the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant is allied or even funded by the Syrian goverment, but we dont put the Syrian gov. as an ISIS ally in its infobox (logically). So, I cannot accept adding Syrian intelligence to the infobox as an ally, nor with the (formerly) clarification, nor with the (allegedly) clarification. Why? Because following that logic we should add, for example, the FSA (formerly) to the ISIS allies section of its infobox, as they were allies until a few months ago, and they even are still allies against Kurdish forces in Hasakah province. A clear double standard example. I agree that allegations could have space in the articles content, but not in the infobox, as it is misleading. Regards, --HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sinai casualties[edit]

Hello, are those deaths included in the 30 killed in airstrikes yesterday? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 23:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say for certain, but it seems very likely that they are the same; they occurred on the same day & the source you gave states that there were "at least" 20 deaths.David O. Johnson (talk) 01:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian Revolution of 2013[edit]

Some user has controversially moved the page to another title and for some reason i can't seem to be able to move it back since the redirect page had a past edit history. I have never faced a similar situation while moving a page back to its initial name (since i'm not entirely new here) so i'm wondering what to do. A little help would be great. Thanks. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:12, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The new title is better. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fitzcarmalan, you will have to request a move so an administrator can do it. Info is here: Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_technical_moves.David O. Johnson (talk) 21:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. This provisional title is most neutral, waiting to find a consensus.--Panam2014 (talk) 21:42, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Panam2014 has also moved the 1959 Constitution of Tunisia page; I'll request an admin move for that article.David O. Johnson (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC) Edit: I've requested the move for the constitution of Tunisia page. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:54, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please do the same for the revolution page? Yes, i have already made similar requests in the past, but i don't know how to explain it this time. And wasn't this the original title? Please explain to me if it is possible for Panam2014 to simply reach a similar conclusion that this new title is better without even bothering to discuss it. Not trying to be childish here, but i don't know why am i the one supposed to make a request while Panam2014 should have done this in the first place. Thoughts? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 22:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll go ahead and make the request; I can't say what Panam2014's motivations are, so I do not know why he didn't discuss these moves beforehand. David O. Johnson (talk) 22:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC) The request is now added. David O. Johnson (talk) 22:07, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, really appreciate this. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 22:12, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The 2014 constitution of Tunisia is not a draft because it was signated by the president. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egyptian parliamentary election, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican People's Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

== Nomination of Egyptian Revolution of 2013 for deletion ==

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egyptian Revolution of 2013 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian Revolution of 2013 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GreyShark (dibra) 19:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reform and Renaissance Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shadow government (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 15:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Reference Errors on 5 May[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Syrian opposition–Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant conflict page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Africa''' (MUJWA), or '''''Jamāʿat at-tawḥīd wal-jihād fī gharb ʾafrīqqīyā'''''<ref name="name"/> ({{lang-ar|جماعة التوحيد والجهاد في غرب أفريقيا}}, {{lang-fr|'''Mouvement pour l'Unicité et le

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Egyptian presidential election, 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|style="background:#efefef"| Voting for Egyptians outside Egypt in the second round (if needed<ref name=mmmarch30/>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of terrorist incidents, 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Free Syrian Army]] or Islamist groups such as the [[Al-Nusra Front]], [[Ahrar ash-Sham]], [[[[Ghuraba al-Sham (jihadist group)|Ghuraba al-Sham]]] or [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant]];

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of armed groups in the Syrian Civil War may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{|class="wikitable"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The WikiProject Egypt Barnstar of National Merit and Notable Contributions
		This is for your countless contributions to articles related to Egyptian politics that many, including me, are unfortunately too lazy to care about. Thank you and keep up the amazing work! Fitzcarmalan (talk) 00:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Afghanistan Barnstar of National Merit
		For your work on the Fall of Kabul page. Randoperson1 (talk) 03:33, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cabinet of Libya[edit]

I bet that you did not notice the corrections in the Zeidan Cabinet, before deleting instead of merging in the Cabinet of Libya article. I will fix. Before I do anything rash, is there an article on the El-Keib cabinet? --Bejnar (talk) 20:32, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Zeidan Cabinet has its own article, as well as the info on the Cabinet of Libya page. I don't think there is an article for the El-Keib cabinet. My apologies for not noticing the corrections.David O. Johnson (talk) 20:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should I make a El-Keib Cabinet article, or put the table in the Cabinet of Libya article? --Bejnar (talk) 20:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would say make a new article. The Cabinet of Egypt, for example, only deals with the current cabinet.David O. Johnson (talk) 21:02, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Bejnar (talk) 21:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ahar al-Jazeera[edit]

The article Ahar al-Jazeera has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:58, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ahar al-Jazeera[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ahar al-Jazeera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:00, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Euphrates Islamic Liberation Front[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Euphrates Islamic Liberation Front, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:46, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

explannation[edit]

i am sorry to tell you that the Sinai insurgency is indeed finished, the Egyptian army says that it has full control of the region, please do some research and if you count all the militants killed you can clearly see it is 469 not 389 i will put my information back on the page, please tell me why before deleting anything next time

farewell — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.223.223.235 (talk) 17:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

end of sinai insurgency[edit]

please do some research before deleting anything i've done because the egyptian army claims to have full control of the peninsula — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.223.223.235 (talk) 20:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to [2], the Sinai insurgency is still going on. Thus the Egyptian army does not have complete control.David O. Johnson (talk) 20:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 6 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Governance of the Gaza Strip page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Theney[edit]

Hello it was difficult to rename. Regards. 16:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panam2014 (talk • contribs)

Ayman Nour[edit]

He is a member of the anti coup alliance ? --Panam2014 (talk) 09:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egyptian Wafd Coalition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reform and Development Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of political parties in Egypt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

agency=Al-Ahram Weekly|date=9 July 2014|accessdate=13 July 2014}}</ref> ,[Arabic Popular Movement]]<ref name=cp9july/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://thecairopost.com/news/116904/news/tamarod-to-announce-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:03, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Minister of Egypt[edit]

Hello, David. Maybe you'll be interested to share your opinion at User talk:Sundostund#Acting and User talk:Panam2014#Re: Acting. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 15:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 25-30 Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quotas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aguila Salah Issa[edit]

Hi Can you create this article ? He is the new libyan president. --Panam2014 (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen much info on him. I think I'll wait until there is more.David O. Johnson (talk) 09:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jaish al-Muhajireen wal-Ansar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{infobox war faction

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at al-Qaeda and remove the flags from that infobox as well. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 11:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Libyan Council of Deputies election, 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

were elected by [[proportional representation]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=LIBYA Majlis Al-Nuwaab (House of Representatives|url=http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2185_B.htm|work=Inter-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Islamic Coalition (Syria) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[19th Division (Syrian rebel group)|19th Division]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:43, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Storm Brigade[edit]

The article that says the NSB joined the Al-Tawhid Brigade is dated March 5. This article, however, is dated March 18 and indicates that although many NSB troops joined Tawhid, there is still a tiny but independent NSB. Anyway, great work! 71.184.147.211 (talk) 03:02, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Al-Thani Cabinet

added a link pointing to Abdullah Al-Thani

Cabinet of Libya

added a link pointing to Abdullah Al-Thani

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sleepy Hollow (TV series) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

230 years later, in the present-day, Ichabod rises from his grave, after the Headless Horseman (revealed to be [[Death (personification)|Death]], one of the [[Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse]],
Mills' investigation reveals the presence of two occult groups - one for good, the other evil -} in Sleepy Hollow, both of which are concerned with the Four Horsemen and the associated apocalypse.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:35, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 Libyan conflict may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

renegade-general-benghazi|title=Islamist militants attack Benghazi airport|publisher=Al-Akhbar]|date=17 September 2014|accessdate=17 September 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:03, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Building and Development Party may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

date=5 December 2013|accessdate=13 December 2013}}</ref> The party is considering leaving the [[Anti-Coup Alliance; it has called for reconciliation with the Sisi administration.<ref>{{Citation|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jihadi John may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

com/james-foleys-murderer-execution-2014-8|accessdate=7 September 2014|publisher=Telegraph)}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:46, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 17 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2014 Libyan conflict page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On List of armed groups in the Syrian Civil War[edit]

Hi. What I meant by saying we didn't need to list Nahrwan Al-Sham in the main list is that it includes several of the groups that are listed above it. Other operational alliances such as the Euphrates Volcano (as opposed to more close-knit alliances like Islamic Front which can be considered a group in itself) are not listed in that section. 130.64.98.69 (talk) 02:45, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Khorasan (Islamist group)[edit]

Dear David O.Johnson, I appreciated your edits in above article, but dont exaggerate. Every school pupil when paying attention in history lessons knows that Khorasan is the name of that ancient empire. There is no reference needed. Monart (talk) 03:03, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Army of Mujahedeen[edit]

Thanks for pointing that out, good catch... I see it now buried at the end of the NPR article with a slightly different name. Nulla Taciti (talk) 00:39, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Affiliated with the FSA?[edit]

I highly doubt the Army of Mujahedeen, the Authenticity and Development Front, and Ansar al-Sham consider themselves affiliated with the FSA. The two articles cited for listing them as such (here and here) may be generalizing the FSA as any factions that aren't jihadist. It would be especially odd if Ansar al-Sham suddenly joined the FSA, considering it's already part of the Islamic Front. Anyway, I think more sources would be needed before listing these three factions as part of the FSA umbrella. 130.64.98.86 (talk) 22:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment, I went ahead and changed the articles back.David O. Johnson (talk) 01:07, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. Great work on the subject in any case! 130.64.98.86 (talk) 01:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egyptian protest law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahmed Maher. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Afek Tounes may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abu Mohammad al-Julani may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''Abu Mohammad al-Julani''' (in [[Arabic language|Arabic]] أبو محمد الجولاني, (also written as '''al-Joulani''', '''al-Jolani''',

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Monkey Magic (TV series) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

;Runlay ([White Dragon Horse]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of political parties in Tunisia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Party]] ({{lang|ar|الحزب الجمهوري المغاربي}}, ''{{lang|fr|Parti républicain maghrébin}}'')]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:54, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tunisian parliamentary election, 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

html|title=After Elections, Tunisia’s Nidaa Tounes Seeks Alliances to Govern|work=VOA}}</ref>> for its democratic viability as the only one of the major [[Arab Spring]] uprisings, including
as a model for Lebanon [[Syrian civil war spillover into Lebanon|amidst its own turmoil]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aawsat.net/2014/10/article55338045|title=Opinion: Tunisia’s Lesson for

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:55, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at the Village Pump[edit]

Hello! This message is to notify you that there is a discussion at the Wikipedia Village Pump that may be of interest to you. -Kudzu1 (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

A topic in which you may be involved, is the subject of discussion at ANI here. SantiLak (talk) 21:21, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Syrian Civil War infobox[edit]

Is it okay if you revert back to my edit? It's just that the YPG and the FSA have an official and declared alliance as opposed to just happening to be fighting the same enemy concurrently. Additionally Jabraht al Akrad is a direct offshoot of the FSA. Zenithfel (talk) 21:35, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Khorasan group[edit]

Hi, I have reverted your edit on Khorasan (Islamist group). Just wanted to explain my reason for doing so, which is this: your personal beliefs are not sufficient reason to remove sourced information. 67.188.230.128 (talk) 07:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have done it again. I repeat, just because you personally disagree with a source does not mean you should remove it. Please discuss on talk page before making further disruptive changes to the article. 67.188.230.128 (talk) 15:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Khorasan (Islamist group) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

RfC - Name of ISIS/ISIL/IS[edit]

There is currently an RfC underway here about what name/abbreviation to use for ISIS/ISIL/IS in the American-led intervention in Syria article. I am trying to get as many users to provide input as possible. I appreciate your contributions! - SantiLak (talk) 00:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion: Operation Inherent Resolve[edit]

A discussion in which you may be interested has opened here. - SantiLak (talk) 19:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian election[edit]

Hi David. I've added an entry for the new Assembly. So far it says results pending but when results are out we'll just have to change the seats parameter on the parties' pages. I'll make sure to update the template. Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 23:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC) Thanks. David O. Johnson (talk) 23:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Junud al-Sham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fitna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! 67.188.230.128 (talk) 21:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Libyan Supreme Court[edit]

Hi The Parliament has been disolved. The parliament was dissolved . This means that the Prime Minister and the Speaker are in rebellion. Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ِABM[edit]

Hello, ABM is now part of IS and adopted the name Wilayat Sinai. Plz read before u change other's work! 3bdulelah (talk) 19:45, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move Discussion at Talk:American-led intervention in Syria[edit]

There is currently an requested move underway here and I am trying to get as many users to provide input as possible. I appreciate your contributions! - SantiLak (talk) 23:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your removal of refs to Egypt, the UAE, from Ansar Bait al-Maqdis[edit]

re: revert as your removal of refs to Egypt, the UAE, from Ansar Bait al-Maqdis. I clearly added the link [[terrorist organization]] with the link directly going to List of designated terrorist organizations. If you considered there to have been an issue of citation then a citation needed template could also be added without your removal of otherwise validated information. Gregkaye ✍♪ 06:08, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Israeli legislative election, 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kulanu[edit]

Hi David. Just seen that you changed the establishment date of Kulanu. If you read the source from 3 December, it states that "Kahlon’s official statement on Wednesday came after he held a founding meeting for the party last Thursday" (i.e. Thursday 27 November). It was only publicly announced that it had happened on 3 December. I've corrected the Kulanu, Kahlon and election articles, but don't know if you Cheers, Number 5 7 10:36, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that; it was a mistake on my part. Thanks for the correction.David O. Johnson (talk) 10:42, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - we all make mistakes - it's how we respond to them that shows our character! Number 5 7 10:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

edits[edit]

Hi, I saw you had reverted some of my edits on jihadist and thought to touch base with you on this to explain and hear your thoughts. I basically see it as a value laden label. To this end I am currently developing a Draft:List of organizations self-described as mujahideen or by jihad. I have similarly done work on Category:Designated terrorist organizations associated with Islam so as not merely to label various Islamist incidents as Islamic terrorism. I have similarly developed Category:Islamist insurgent groups to cover organizations that are not designated as terrorist. I think that it is fine to quote other organisations as declaring a group to be jihadist (a western relative neologism) or terrorist but I have qualms about doing this in Wikipedia's voice at least extensively. Groups like al-Jazeera have also taken to using the phases "self-declared jihadist" and "self-proclaimed jihadist". The groups are not contested to be Islamist be may be contested to be jihadist. There certainly is little connection to jihad in many of the cases. Its most frequently a case of quran based believer against quran based believer. GregKaye ✍♪ 14:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amoud Houran Brigade

added a link pointing to TOW

Dawn of Islam Division

added a link pointing to TOW

Tawhid Kata’ib Horan

added a link pointing to TOW

Yarmouk Brigade

added a link pointing to TOW

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Otzma Yehudit[edit]

Hi David. I see that you created Otzma Yehudit. I think it would have been preferable to simply move Otzma LeYisrael to that title - it's exactly the same party, it's simply been renamed. If it's ok with you, I'll move the older article over the top of the new one you created? Cheers, Number 5 7 22:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That does make sense. I agree with the move. David O. Johnson (talk) 23:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done. Number 5 7 11:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yarmouk Martyrs Brigade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Front. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Awakening of Egypt

added a link pointing to National Bloc

Egyptian parliamentary election, 2015

added a link pointing to National Bloc

List of political parties in Egypt

added a link pointing to National Bloc

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What did you see wrong in the edit[edit]

You reverted here. I'd like to ask what was it that you thought was wrong? Thanks. Greg Kaye 00:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is not an Islamist group, but a jihadist group.David O. Johnson (talk) 00:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the reference to terrorism and added references to Islamism. I removed the reference to terrorism on the valid basis of WP:TERRORISM but do not insist on its removal. I added reference to Islamism on the view that the group are applying pressure to promote an interpretation of Islam politically. As I see it there has been a POV push with regard to the use of jihadist based terminologies in Wikipedia which has included the frequent placement of the "Jihadist organization" category at the top of category lists. I know that I have done so on other occasion but my edit made no removal of jihadist reference. Greg Kaye 10:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 7 January[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Jaysh al-Ummah page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive unnecessary edits.[edit]

If you continue to not only remove factual information from the article Ansar Bait al-Maqdis, but also continue down your "no flag/decorations crusade" on Al-Nusra Front and Khorasan (Islamist group), I'll be following this up with an ANI on your bizarre behavior. You cannot unilaterally decide to remove these icons from the info-box, by interpreting WP policy (which is contentious at best) in your own manner. You're the only user I have ever come across to do this, namely remove icons of any sort from an info-box. StanMan87 (talk) 04:33, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reason behind removing image on Charlie Hebdo shooting?[edit]

Seems totally legit, what is the reason for removing? Nothing is discussed about this on talk, at least none that I could find.

Please keep in mind that visual presentation on wikipedia is also relevant, and the article looks really good the way it used to be. What are you thoughts?

Edit War[edit]

Your recent editing history at Charlie Hebdo shooting shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gamebuster19901 (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a section on the talk page of the article here [3]; however, it's not showing up on the page, though it does show in the history; I'm not sure why.David O. Johnson (talk) 01:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like User:Curly Turkey fixed it.[4] Xharm (talk) 03:33, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The formatting of a hidden comment was done incorrectly, so the "hidden comment" ended up eating the entire rest of the page. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 03:36, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.David O. Johnson (talk) 03:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that my comment on the Talk page somehow ended up with Curly Turkey's signature; I'm going to add my own signature to it.David O. Johnson (talk) 03:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Hebdo Edits[edit]

Please explain your removing of bundled citations on the Charlie Hebdo shooting on this talk page section. Gamebuster19901 (talk) 01:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 1 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Sinai insurgency page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exemplary behavior, thanks![edit]

Thanks for your excellent behavior! After a very constructive edit of yours that I misunderstood, you start a discussion instead of either reverting back or pointing out what a mistake I made, both of which you would have been perfectly right to do. If all users had your combination of helpful edits and helpful behavior, there would be no conflicts on this site. Thanks again and keep up the great work!!Jeppiz (talk) 20:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

how to develop/restore a Transhumanist Party article[edit]

(Sorry if this may not be relevant for you, but i am reaching out to several other editors and think you might possibly be interested.) Hey, i see that you contributed some at the old article, and recently some others have tried to restore the article on the Transhumanist Party that was effectively deleted by "redirect" outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transhumanist Party. I see that in the AFD discussion i participated a lot, and argued for redirect at the time. But actually I am interest personally in Transhumanism, and I do want to support development of a valid article on the Transhumanist Party, as long as there are more sources available now and it can be developed to meet Wikipedia standards for an article. But, the way forward is for editors to develop a draft, and that can be done at Draft:Transhumanist_Party and discussed at Draft talk:Transhumanist_Party. Then when it is improved, submit it (by inserting {{submit}} at the top of the page) for approval to move to mainspace. (Or, technically another option is to dispute the AFD decision by appealing at wp:DRN, but takes time and that is highly unlikely to succeed, and I don't recommend it.) If an editor just restores the article, that is out of regular process, and if it is repeated enough, the editor can get slammed...possibly blocked or banned from Wikipedia. Feel free to develop at Draft:Transhumanist_Party, anyhow. cheers, sincerely, --do ncr am 19:49, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mahlab Cabinet[edit]

The government Mahlab III does not exist. It is always the government Mahlab II but was overhauled. The sources speak of reshuffle. The Prime Minister did unsworn again, only the new ministers were sworn in. So, on June 17, there has been shift from government Mahlab I to government Mahlab II because Mahlab resigned and then sworn in a second time. I think I'll make a fusion in a while. Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you're saying. I don't have a problem with the proposed changes. David O. Johnson (talk) 17:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 18 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Kulanu page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Snyder isn't running...[edit]

Please do not undo my edit to the 2016 election page. Michigan Governor Rick Snyder is NOT running. http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/rick-snyder-not-running-for-president-117713.html Iwkrager (talk) 23:43, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reform and Renaissance Party logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reform and Renaissance Party logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't undo my Trump 2016 edit.[edit]

Trump did state in his announcement that he would not participate in bicycle races. I will give you a reasonable time to respond. Then, I will add the factual information again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.112.166.96 (talk) 16:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC) Source: ^[1][reply]

References

^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UCveugU_i0&t=49m15s

Hello, thanks for adding the info to wikipedia, it looks like you were trying to improve things, that's appreciated. I do understand why David removed what you added though... bicycle races seems to have nothing to do with the presidential races! But appearances can be deceiving, and in this case bicycle races turn out to be worth mentioning. Your link to the youtube video is presumably proof (though I haven't watched all 45 minutes myself) that Trump indeed mentioned bicycle races in his announcement. That might be something worth putting into the article, per WP:ABOUTSELF, even though it was Trump himself that was making the comment in the youtube video.

Now usually, youtube isn't a very reliable source in WP:SOURCES terms that wikipedia normally relies on, but in this case, that is a link to the official youtube channel of a television station, WSVN-TV channel 7 in Miami, who decided to publish the entire 47-minute announcement speech. This teevee-station-enhanced-credibility might arguably make the mention of bicycle races, once we can specifically locate it inside the WSVN-youtube-source, satisfy WP:NOTEWORTHY and be worth putting in the article... albeit as a primary source, it should be used with care. One technical-difficulty problem though, the link you gave is specifically to 49m15s into the video, but the speech is only 47m51s long right now on youtube; maybe the TV station cut down the footage, or maybe the 49m15s thing was just a goof. To use the WSVN source, we would need a more exact point in the primary-source-speech when Trump mentioned the bicycle races.

Even better, another source that would be even more helpful to demonstrating WP:NOTEWORTHY, would be some kind of secondary-source, which was reviewing/summarizing the Trump announcement speech, and mentioned the bicycle-thing as part of the review/summary. Doing a bit of googling via yahoo.com powered by bing.com, I found this secondary source, which does exactly that.[5] So, it looks like the bicycle-race quote was not merely *found* in the 47-minute-video somewheres, it was (according to wiki-reliable-source Politico) one of the top three quotes from the whole announcement-speech. That definitely satisfies WP:NOTEWORTHY in my mind, and so I think the bicycle-racing thing can definitely be mentioned in the article on the Trump campaign. However, I strongly suggest we write something which explains the context of the bicycle-race quotation, like this maybe.

"During his announcement speech, Trump said he would keep Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and criticized John Kerry for the current status of negotiations with Iran; Trump also criticized Kerry's judgement outside the political realm, in particular breaking^[when?] his leg (at age 72) in a bicycle race, after which Trump made a firm campaign promise never to race bicycles himself.[6]" That gives the 'flavor' of the Trump candidacy, plus also summarizes why Politico found the bicycle-quote noteworthy, methinks. It would be better if it could be trimmed down ('as simple as possible but no simpler'), and properly wikilinked to the articles about the Iran negotiations, plus needs a source (or wikilink) which talks about when/how/where Kerry broke his leg. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 19:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(( Sorry David, I misread the sig of 99.112 above ... I thought they posted this here in mid-July a couple weeks ago, not in mid-June six weeks ago. :-) I've moved my suggestion to article-talk. )) 75.108.94.227 (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. David O. Johnson (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Fatah Halab[edit]

Hi David,

Thanks for sharing your knowledge on Fatah Halab! It's off to a pretty good start, but perhaps you could add some more information? I think it could use some expansion... :)

If you have any questions or concerns, let me know!

EmilyREditor (talk) 04:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

article on republican debates , ref-syntax-question[edit]

Hi David, your work on ref-cleanup is much appreciated. You removed[7] the |quote= portion from one of the named-refs, because it was used (by name-referent) in more than one place, i.e. the same cite was used to back about five sentences, only three of which were specifically related to the |quote= portion. Is there some way to properly do what I was trying to do? I understand I could have made

<ref name=A>{{cite web |url=xyz.com |quote=blah blah}}</ref>

and then for the other sentences unrelated to the quoted portion made another

<ref name=B>{{cite web |url=xyz.com |quote=blah blah}}</ref>

but that would have resulted in duplicate-URL-refs at the bottom, right? Which as I understand it is also frowned upon. Is there some wiki-syntax I'm unaware of, that allows a URL to be used five times, but a quotation-attached-to-that-URL to only be used for three of those five? Thanks. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 18:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know.David O. Johnson (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that makes two of us. :-) In the meantime, it looks like Metropolitan90 has corrected the specific quotation-related-problem for this article in another fashion entirely, by moving the not-present-reasons to an explanatory paragraph with parenthesized reasons, rather than leaving the specific reasons purely in ref-quotations. If I manage to find an answer to the wiki-syntax question I'll try and remember to let you know. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 12:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The word on wikipedia-en-help is that there just isn't a good way. Here is the best wiki-syntax-kludge I could come up with, and it's not very good. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 18:46, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carly Fiorina[edit]

There is ambiguity as to Fiorina's home state for this election. Her committee is filed from Virginia, although she is known as 'from California'. That anonymous edit wasn't vandalism, I'm not sure which fact is true. Spartan7W § 18:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment[edit]

As a significant contributor to the article United States presidential election, 2016, your participation in this discussion would be helpful and appreciated. Thank you. --William S. Saturn (talk) 21:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment #2[edit]

Hi again David, I have opened up a section on the article-talkpage, please comment at Talk:Republican_Party_presidential_debates,_2016#per-debate_tables_.2C_showing_airtime-allotted_versus_poll-numbers if you would like to. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 17:19, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New discussion[edit]

Thank you for your participation in the discussion. A new discussion has started here with other options for organizing the list of candidates. Please see if any of the new options are better than those available when you voted. --William S. Saturn (talk) 00:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of political parties in Egypt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

بقواعد"الجبهة المصرية"|date=8 September 2015|accessdate=9 September 2015|work=Youm7}}</ref>, [[Conference Party]<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.elwatannews.com/news/details/802245|title=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Saddam Hussein may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''Saddam Hussein Abd al-Majid al-Tikriti''' ([[Arabic alphabet|Arabic]]: {{lang|ar|صدام حسين عبد المجيد التكريتي}} ''{{transl|ar|DIN|Ṣaddām

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion[edit]

I opened an ANI thread [8] that might be of interest for you. I do not really know, may be this page should be renamed, or maybe we need two different page, but unilateral moves without discussion (and you did it two times!) are against the policy. My very best wishes (talk) 19:41, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:41, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join MILHIST[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson, you are hereby invited to join the Military history WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, theory, and practice. You can add your name to the list of members, browse our showcase, train at the Academy, weigh in at current discussions, read the news, or find an open task. We hope you will join us! Anotherclown (talk) 05:09, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to MILHIST[edit]

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 06:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

Some "not very nice at all" person who has no record decided to vandalize an article I was working on. Results of the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 , don't want to turn this into an edit war (s/he seems to have used two sock puppets: 2600:1003:b104:42a4:0:46:10a2:8c01 and Szzy8). What do I do? The Primaries pages have already gotten too long and the thing is quite necessary even nowYoursT (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like the page has stabilized for now. I did notice that the similar page you started for the Democratic side of things [9] was deleted earlier. It had some useful info. Perhaps the user can be reported as a possible sock puppet if they try to vandalize the Republican results article again. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bettino Craxi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''See also:'' [[Tangentopoli]] ''(Italian for ''bribeville'', used to indicate the corruption-based system that ruled Italy''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open![edit]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hello[edit]

hi, i can'not speak english good. in page Ajnad al-Sham Islamic Union, i deleted the blog source. you reverted my edit, please delete this source from the page. thank you. (my languge is persian).7ramin7 (talk) 07:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notice[edit]

This is a required notification that United States presidential election, 2020 is currently subject to discretionary sanctions under the USPOL case. LavaBaron (talk) 22:59, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ismail cabinet[edit]

Hi. A reshuffle of Sherif Ismail Cabinet occured in Egypt in March 2016. Could you update the page ? Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 20:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Jihad in the Path of God Brigade.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Jihad in the Path of God Brigade.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Talk:Evan McMullin: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Admins won't block that alt-right IP with insufficient warnings. If you place warnings when reverting it becomes easier to get a block. Thanks for reverting the vandalism, though. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon![edit]

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017[edit]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Republican Party presidential candidates, 2016[edit]

I believe you were the first editor of Republican Party presidential candidates, 2016 to use the word "presumptive", which you used in the heading "Presumptive nominee." I invite you to add any comment you may happen to have on a discussion at Talk:Attempted assassination of Donald Trump#Presumptive nominee. —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting[edit]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians[edit]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hegemony (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lux Mundi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INTDABLINK violation[edit]

Please do NOT introduce WP:INTDABLINK violations into Wikipedia, as you did with this edit. All intentional links to disambiguation pages must be piped through the appropriate "Foo (disambiguation)" redirect. This prevents system errors. Thanks. bd2412 T 03:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Venezuelan parliamentary election, 2018[edit]

Hi Could you review the article ? --Panam2014 (talk) 21:15, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it meets the criteria; see [10] (specifically, #1).David O. Johnson (talk)

The electoral authorities refused to allow the elections to take place on 22 April 2018 for technical reasons and said they will soon announce a date. Since they will be fixed, it shows that they will take place before the scheduled date. Also, we have articles about election who will took place after years. --Panam2014 (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Jaysh al-Badia.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Jaysh al-Badia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Jaysh al-Malahim.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Jaysh al-Malahim.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Theft Auto III soundtrack[edit]

Hello David, thanks for expressing your concern over the Grand Theft Auto III soundtrack page. Unfortunately, the page is of little to no encyclopedic value as it goes straigh against our WP:GAMECRUFT and related policies. See also a related AfD discussion for GTAV's radio stations page. Note that important content can, in a smaller fashion, be included in the main article, yet that does not justify keeping the cruft article itself. If you think you could do that, that would be great! If there is no opposition, I'm looking forward to reinstating the redirect. Thanks! Lordtobi (✉) 08:12, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the effort to reach out and explain your decision. I understand the reasoning behind the redirect and do not oppose it. David O. Johnson (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive[edit]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ismail Cabinet[edit]

Hi three reshuffles occured since 2016. Please, could you update the articles ? --Panam2014 (talk) 15:39, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cuba is a one-party state.[edit]

You are censoring a verifiable edit informing the public of Cuba's dictatorship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LimonCHELLO (talk • contribs) 23:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't necessary to go out of your way to mention it, though. It just sounds out of place. David O. Johnson (talk)

LimonCHELLO, your addition consists of editorializing which violates the neutral point of view. There are many one party states in the world. We describe that in properly referenced neutral prose in our articles about the governments of those countries. We do not add that unreferenced content to the biographies of their various government officials. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:29, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

mexico election.[edit]

I'M NOT ADDING ACTUAL RESULTS!! please dont undo my work, im not adding actual results, im just adding templates, and tables that will eventually show the result, please don't undo my work. Thanks! Angelgfg12345 (talk) 19:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for removing the table. David O. Johnson (talk)

== List of Knox County Mayor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knox_County,_Tennessee where can i find Knox County Mayor list? Colton Meltzer (talk) 21:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amo (album)[edit]

Apologies for quickly rolling back your edit without explanation on Amo (album), I was about to undo the IP address's edit anyway, which removed the note. Ss112 11:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Alliance to Support Islam[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Alliance to Support Islam should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance to Support Islam .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Rosguill^talk 07:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Glenn Jacobs[edit]

@NDACFan: @Bold and Brash: A Wikipedia page has been created for the correct name of the mayor, after no single feedback were ever even reviewed in consensus/discussion (all i saw was no we should not rename because...no we should move because he known for...or that what been doing for life...) I used the available options within the Wikipedia guidelines to create the True Knox County Mayor Glenn Jacob page. Enjoy the true page of Glenn Jacobs of mayor Knox County. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Jacobs_(politician) Colton Meltzer (talk) 21:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have your say![edit]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You made a typo on the Avigdor Lieberman page[edit]

Just wanted to let you know.68.47.64.121 (talk) 20:30, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I fixed it. David O. Johnson (talk) 20:55, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards[edit]

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You changed protocol[edit]

Hi there! In this otherwise constructive edit you also changed the link from https to http, please don't. --Palosirkka (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards[edit]

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hosen L'Yisrael[edit]

What's an "RM"? VwM.Mwv (talk) 18:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Otzma Yehudit running alone[edit]

Hello, I wanted to say that it seems like the Otzma / Tkuma / Jewish Home situation hasn't fully ended. A news report from this hour seems like negotiations are still going on. ShimonChai (talk) 17:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The political situation will probably keep changing right until the 21st.David O. Johnson (talk) 17:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Independent Party for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Independent Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Independent Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 11:25, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Jewish Home article[edit]

The problem is the citations are still there from when the description was "right-wing to far-right wing", the most common reference to the political position of the Jewish Home is typically just right-wing (as opposed to a far-right party like Otzma Yehudit which is almost always called far-right and or Kahanist), but the citations used in the infobox are contradictory to both what the infobox itself lists, as well as common descriptions of the parties position. ShimonChai (talk) 08:10, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Minor parties[edit]

Hi David. I don't think you should keep creating articles in very minor parties that are unlikely to pass the electoral threshold. We already have far too many of these articles on parties that contested an election once then disappeared. If they're founded by a notable politician, simply link any mention of the party's name to them instead. Cheers, Number 5 7 12:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. David O. Johnson (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I am slowly merging all the old very small parties into List of minor political parties in Israel rather than having perma-stub articles floating about for many of them. Number 5 7 01:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tzomet[edit]

Hi, regarding Tzomet (2019 political party) - Tzomet was never closed. It was more or less inactive since loosing last time in 2009 but the party stayed registered and used as a "shelf party" by Hazan. If you compare the names running in 2009 and 2019 some of the names will be identical - there are new candidates but the old ones are still around. Please merge articles. DGtal (talk) 12:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Approval[edit]

Did Joseph Sandberg approve the photo you posted of him. thanks for answering — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefreeencyclopediamember (talk • contribs) 00:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thefreeencyclopediamember, Approval is not required. As you have been asked repeatedly - once again, please don't bold everything you post. SQL ^{Query me!} 00:13, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Knesset 2019.svg[edit]

Hello, my name is Space Monitor. The reason I am addressing you is because I want to upload a new version of the diagram [11] because of the result change in Israeli 2019 election. I was wondering if, you could help me out. Thank you! Space Monitor (talk) 00:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the current version of the diagram looks accurate; Likud has 35 seats, while Shas has 8 seats. [12]. David O. Johnson (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But on the diagram, in the Knesset article, [13] it displays Likud on 36 and UTJ on 7. Space Monitor (talk) 01:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IDK how to do it. David O. Johnson (talk) 01:21, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, I’ll just create a new diagram, without overwriting the existing file, but thanks anyway. Space Monitor (talk) 01:36, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Elements of Anger. First, changing the article to a redirect is not vandalism and calling it such is considered inappropriate. Second, not one reference. It fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM, however, if you'd like time to find some, do it before restoring the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:52, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Latuff[edit]

That Not Was Vandalism That Was A FAct Since Latuff Drawn Usa AS Evil And Russia As God — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.50.105.130 (talk) 07:15, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the Democratic primaries[edit]

I'm putting a copy of my comment here:

"David O. Johnson talk contribs‎ 170,133 bytes +1‎ Undid revision 902165738 by Arglebargle79 (talk) we don't have to go by what the DNC says" Well, we should. and here's why: they RUN the damn thing. Four years ago, they ran out several candidates in order to fix it for Hillary, and four years before that they refused to let in the delegates for several challengers to Obama, even though they got close or did better than 40% of the vote in some primaries. Also, we must never assume that the casual reader is going to go to other pages. Thus, in a "survey article" like this one, we need a summary of what the state of the race is. The DNC is running this race, and therefore we MUST defer to their judgment, even if we do not necessarily agree with it. NOT to have a separation of the invited candidates from the disinvited ones, is misleading. That is something we shouldn't do. Arglebargle79 (talk) 10:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

please stop reflexivly reverting everything i do. For example: Sistack just announced yesterday, and you reverted because he had "withdrawn" Not nice. Arglebargle79 (talk) 19:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since I noticed you have often edited the 2020 Democratic Party presidential debates and forums page, I was wondering if you could help me with the main page 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. Wikipedia editor Cartoon Boy removed Mike Gravel from the subsection "Withdrew before the primaries" in the "Candidates" section, citing the lack of sourcing for this. However, Gravel has withdrawn & I had a Vanity Fair article that I had placed in the "Timeline" section on July 31, 2019 detailing Gravel's withdrawal. Since I don't know how to make the table thing being used for the candidates, & I have edited Cartoon Boy's talk page to no avail, I am asking you to revert his edit and include my source. Thanks!

Sestak at 2020 Democratic Primaries[edit]

Hi, would like to hear a little more about your reasoning here. My thoughts (and I am relatively ambivalent about this) is that Sestak's career as a three-star officer in the US Armed Forces is at least as notable as Warren and the CFPB, which is the only other non-elected federal office listed in the table. If I have read correctly, the other candidates with military service are Buttigieg (Lieutenant, Navy Reserve), Gabbard (Major, Army National Guard), and Moulton (Captain, US Army). I think there's a clear difference between them and Sestak but would be interested to know your thoughts. Thanks, NW (Talk) 22:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HELP! I definitely messed up 2020 Democraitc Presidential Primaries page. Sorry :((((((

Disambiguation link notification for July 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ministry of Agricultural Development and Food (Greece), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

I misread the jpost article, my bad. Thought labor was part of the alliance. ShimonChai (talk) 06:19, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. David O. Johnson (talk) 06:24, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism???[edit]

You may disagree with an edit that I make as much as you want, but please refrain from personal attacks. There's no way in hell that this umpteenth mass shooting is going to be "High importance" for the Crime or Texas projects. As these things go, the horrible truth is that the whole event will be forgotten in a year at most (except by the victims and their families, of course). Next time that you call one of my edits "vandalism", I'll see you at WP:ANI. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 06:28, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you[edit]

	Greetings
	Damn ~ and I thought that would get overlooked ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 01:46, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A pre-referendum that occured in Uruguay on 4 August 2019[edit]

Hello Sir Sorry to bother you I see that you are interested in politics and in referendums (After i want to thank u fir ur tireless work efforts and edits) I want to refer to a very unpublicised english-none sourced or mentioned referendum that occured yesterday in August. Hope u can see fit that u or another more experienced editor create the English page for https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consulta_popular_para_convocar_a_referéndum_contra_la_Ley_Trans

For more infos, please check https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Uruguay#Gender_identity_and_expression and a simple google search for Ley Trans Uruguay will give u multiple sources and infos that i'm sure are all in the spanish wiki page of that miserably failed referendum Thank you sir! Cheers! I also found this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_consultation_to_convene_a_referendum_against_decriminalization_of_abortion

which is a translation of this https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consulta_popular_para_convocar_a_referéndum_contra_la_despenalización_del_aborto_en_Uruguay So!

Would u be so kind and answer if u have time or can or unable to do it, so i can refer it to another more experienced editor than me thank you AdamPrideTN (talk) 22:16, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look around for sources on it. David O. Johnson (talk) 22:28, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@David O. Johnson: Thx for responding, i think all the needed sources are in the Spanish page version or a simple google search of

Ley Trans Uruguay Thx anyway and if u don't have time or can't thats ok thanks anyway too Cheers! AdamPrideTN (talk) 00:55, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

De La Fuente on the 2020 Republican Primary page[edit]

Hello, there is an ongoing discussion regarding this topic on the page's talkpage. Your comments would be welcome there. There is no definition as to what constitutes sufficient media coverage to warrant inclusion, and as De La Fuente's campaign is currently receiving significant media coverage i believe he meets the criteria as it is written on the page.XavierGreen (talk) 18:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai[edit]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign Finances of Notable Non-major candidates[edit]

I have opened a discussion of this issue on the talk page of the 2020 Republican Presidential primaries campaign page. Contrary to your assertion in your revert of my edit, Rocky De La Fuente along with a handful of other individuals are in fact specifically listed as having notable candidacies on the page. I suggest you submit your remarks to the article's talk page.XavierGreen (talk) 20:56, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Small correction[edit]

When I reverted your death toll reversion, I said your source said "Five people were killed". It actually said "There were five people killed". I'm sorry for any inconvenience this transcription error may have caused you, but five dead is still five dead, by any wording. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:24, September 1, 2019 (UTC)

Moot point now that it's seven and one. I think everyone knows that makes eight. Have a lovely evening! InedibleHulk (talk) 00:01, September 2, 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Junud al-Sham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Named (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:14, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi David O. Johnson,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removal does not necessarily equal vandalism[edit]

It may be better to implore those users to use edit summaries, but accusing editors in good standing of vandalism is the wrong approach. See also what vandalism is not. El_C 05:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi David O. Johnson,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark[edit]

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi David O. Johnson,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of tag[edit]

Kindly explain your removal of my tag at Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump here and why you consider Business Insider to be a sufficiently reliable source for the lead, despite a lack of consensus on that particular source at RSO. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 20:02, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Required notice for edits related to the Syrian Civil War[edit]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

If you have any questions, don't hesistate to contact me on my talk page.

ST47 (talk) 22:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITV Debate Poll[edit]

It was not vandalism. I would appreciate it if you read the talk page. I won’t edit the debate part again without a consensus JamesVilla44 (talk) 20:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Investigations involving Benjamin Netanyahu[edit]

Nice to meet you David O. Johnson ~ just to let you know this {Use dmy dates|date=February 2019} takes care of that ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 20:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up; it's really useful wikicode. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2019 Iraqi protests[edit]

On 3 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Iraqi protests, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spacing[edit]

Please put that blank line back. (I'd do so myself but with discretionary sanctions—yanno, the reverting reversions thing ...) Preachy ate chew! --Brogo13 (talk) 19:48, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion on Metromedia[edit]

Hello David O. Johnson just to let you know I put a disruptive notice on User:72.69.243.12 talk page after his edit on Metromedia was reverted by you. Have a Happy New Year. YborCityJohn (talk) 00:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification. You too. David O. Johnson (talk) 00:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ecotechie reverts[edit]

Hello David. I wasn't sure what the problem was with these edits. Ecotechie changed the link to be a direct one, but not the text of the article, which continued to refer to the party as the Green Movement. These types of edits are discouraged as being pointless (as long as redirects remain in place), but they shouldn't be reverted if made. Cheers, Number 5 7 12:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I changed them was that the organization wasn't named the "Green Party", but the "Green Movement", when said events took place. Looking back on it, I see it's a non-issue in the bigger scheme of things. Thanks for the heads up. David O. Johnson (talk) 18:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible edit conflict[edit]

Your edit undid a few of my changes—mostly trimming of somewhat obsolete info now that a more specific timeline has been announced. Did you mean to do that, or only to move the refs as stated in your edit summary? Thanks, UpdateNerd (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I only moved the refs up, as stated in my edit summary. I don't know what happened with the rest of the edits. I'll revert my edit. David O. Johnson (talk) 06:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit, I'm one revert away from WP:3RR, actually. I don't think I can do it. David O. Johnson (talk) 06:23, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit, After more closely reading it, 3RR applies to a single page. I'll go ahead and revert. David O. Johnson (talk) 06:26, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

your most recent edit[edit]

Hey.. you accidentally switched between Likud and BW on the polls. BW has 36 and Likud has 31. All three polls are switched. Idan (talk) 21:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think I fixed it. David O. Johnson (talk) 22:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion notification[edit]

Hello. File:Logo of the United Jewish Home.jpeg was speedily deleted under CSD criterion F5 because it was an orphaned non-free use image which was very unlikely to have any use on any other valid article.

The image was orphaned because United Jewish Home was proposed for deletion and subsequently deleted. If you wish to have the article and image restored, you can request such at WP:REFUND. Cheers. --kingboyk (talk) 18:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing off-wiki harassment[edit]

Hi. Next time you receive a threatening or harassing email through the Wikipedia function, it's probably best to send it as evidence via email to the Arbitration Committee rather than disclosing it in public. Anyway, I would not worry about this, at all. Just make sure you never respond to such emails so your email address does not get disclosed. Thanks and keep up the good work! El_C 05:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice. David O. Johnson (talk) 05:50, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American politics discretionary sanctions notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:52, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iowa Caucus[edit]

There are no official results reported for the Iowa caucus, and what you are referencing are unofficial results. Instead of reverting to vandalism, please state your argument on the page's talk page here and explain why The Green Papers and The Daily Kos are better sources than the ones I provided (The New York Times, The Washington Post and the IDP's official website) who have ALL published that 0 out of 1765 precincts have reported their results. Leonardo Lazov (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yellowhammer News[edit]

David, I made an edit to Yellowhammer News revising you. Don't want you to think I'm sneaky so telling you what I did. I explained my reasons in my edit summary. HighAtop94 (talk) 18:06, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is that edit summary supposed to be an insult?David O. Johnson (talk) 18:23, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my goodness, not at all meant to be an insult! No no, just some levity. I don't spend a lot of time on Wikipedia, I don't know if it's overly crazy to tell you if I change one of your edits, maybe I was being too cautious in alerting you to this little change. I don't know, maybe it woudl be like picking up the apple cores that Michael Jordan has around his waste paper basket because he missed and then tossing them in. Terrible analogy I know. I sort of feel bad and want to post this quickly and assure you I didn't mean that as an insult at all! So sorry. I didn't spend a lot of time looking at what you do on Wikipedia, I assume you are a force for more info and good (and, not too be too dramatic but, frankly, making the world better) and I should be more careful with comments that can be taken as insults. HighAtop94 (talk) 22:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ROLLBACKUSE[edit]

I don't think I have ever seen such blatant abuse of rollback as this. Don't do it again. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:48, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my gosh, how has no one warned you about edits like this: [14] [15] [16] [17]. @El C: please review. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:54, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The third instance you cite [18] is a clear act of vandalism, going against established consensus. Most of the editors came to the consensus here: [19] that Rocky De La Fuente was a major candidate, though some disagree and make it known by editing in that way. The fourth instance [20] was adding back sourced info, as the name of the group in the cited ref was "Congressional Hispanic Caucus BOLD", as you can see in the ref: "CHC BOLD, the political arm of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus." [21].David O. Johnson (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David, although I'm not that strict when it comes to rollback use, you do need to start applying it more judiciously, or you risk that userright being revoked. Thanks and good luck. El_C 19:06, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I'll keep that in mind in the future.David O. Johnson (talk) 19:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020[edit]

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Will you please stop with the edit Rollback abuse![edit]

You know darn well, I"m doing this in good faith. You also know that "incumbent/nominee, challengers" has been used in every primary article with an incumbent in it since the one for 1984. 2004, 1996, and 1992, just for reference.

You also know that Super Tuesday is in 48 hours or so, and then there will be lots of necessary disruption all across the entire spectrum of articles in the series. Do you really think that it'll look "encyclopedic' not acknowledging the simple fact that Trump has been the provisional Republican nominee for over a year, and the pretense that this is a competitive race should finally be put to bed for good starting Wednesday? Trump will be a hundred and a tad votes short of the nomination at that point and including the states where he's unopposed (this is not sports, we can count this stuff), he's already got enough to clinch the nomination, the whole thing is pro forma anyway starting at that point, hell, it's pro forma now. So stop reverting everything I do, okay?Arglebargle79 (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Knesset[edit]

Just a heads up, it's probably worth keeping an eye on this article. I suspect our IP friend will not easy accept the fact that Gesher can't become a Knesset faction on its own until the House Committee agrees. Cheers, Number 5 7 14:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow you must have some sort of obsession about me, that’s already twice you have talked to someone about me. Trust me, I am not your friend because if, you truly would be a friend, you would have a different attitude and you would be nicer/knows how to talk to someone kindly and by the way, when you are wrong, which is a lot, your not easy to convince when users give you sources because you only believe in yours. - 98.115.9.16 (talk) 20:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The issue with your edits is that they were incorrect; as Number57 pointed out here: [22], factions don't split until approved by the Knesset speaker. They even provided a link in their edit. David O. Johnson (talk) 04:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know that, that’s why I will wait. - 98.115.9.16 (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Andrew Gillum[edit]

Hey David,

Can you look at the RfP section on the Gillum talk page? I'm a new wikier, and I'd like to understand the underlying policies as well. Would the detail be alright if multiple, credible news sites reported the fact?

If you can look from my edit history, I am not a right-wing troll. I sincerely thought the Gillum edits were in good faith.

Thanks HorseDonkey (talk) 09:26, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Derekh Eretz and Blue and White (Israel)[edit]

I found some useful information about Derekh Eretz that began independent way in Knesset. I think that site of Knesset is the most authoritate source in our dispute.

https://www.knesset.gov.il/faction/eng/FactionCurrent_eng.asp

--Nathan Gimein (talk) 23:54, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct. The Knesset site is pretty solid. David O. Johnson (talk) 00:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On a related note, well done for having the patience to continually deal with the premature edits on so many articles re mergers, splits etc. Unfortunately I suspect another spell of edit warring on the election infobox may be about to start as well, so worth keeping an eye on that... Cheers, Number 5 7 18:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert with mentions[edit]

Hi David O. Johnson. You reverted my change to Nova Scotia killings, but you didn't use the undo functionality or mention my username in the edit summary, so I didn't catch your revert until many, many edits later. In the future, could you please mention me if/when you revert my changes?

As for the substance of the change, I'll discuss that on the article talk page. AlexEng^(TALK) 05:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aleppo Liberation Operations Room for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aleppo Liberation Operations Room is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleppo Liberation Operations Room until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ladsgroup^overleg 15:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Captions[edit]

Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Batwoman_%28TV_series%29&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=956212186&oldid=956192065, please see MOS:TABLECAPTION, all data tables must have captions. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Benny Gantz[edit]

Hi

Do you have as source that he is Deputy Prime Minister, instead Vice Prime Minister of Alternate Prime Minister? --Panam2014 (talk) 17:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Jerusalem Post has it as Vice Prime Minister here: [23] (which is what I changed the wikilink to here: [24]). David O. Johnson (talk) 17:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For Moshe Ya'alon, the office was extra constitutional. And for Gantz? --Panam2014 (talk) 17:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Murder of Rina Shnerb for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Rina Shnerb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Rina Shnerb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nableezy - 19:48, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 19:48, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Knesset[edit]

Hi David O. Johnson,

thanks for your report at WP:AIV. The page has now been protected against further disruption. Please consider requesting protection in similar cases and/or reporting the user at WP:ANEW, keeping WP:3RR in mind when reverting, as "vandalism" (malicious intent) might not be what has happened there.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your assistance. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Oh, and sorry, David O. Johnson, I had not seen that the report has already been redirected to WP:RFPP before, that you have already acknowledged the same advice, and that a report at WP:RFPP even already existed when I wrote the message. Sorry for the unnecessary redundancy. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't sweat it. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Respond to revert to my edits at DEVA Party page[edit]

Hi David O. Johnson,

DEVA party is a center-right, neoliberal capitalist party in all perspectives. The "second hand independent" resources were simply whitewashing right-wing posts only to praise that particular political party as centrist, neutral democracy party opposed to regime of Erdoğan, whichi has bad times with the west. The reason I have provided reference from the first hand was only to show even themselves acknowledge their own neoliberal, center-right socioeconomic programs. I can provide citations from news sites that think the same way as I do as well. There are many second hand leftist news sites that are even calling Babacan a fascist regarding the fish hook theory and his very political actions performed in the past, but I try to be neutral and politically correct. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 11:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want that lousy picture of Biden in most of the 2020 primary pages?[edit]

I noticed that you supported it in the a post on the talk page. Why?Arglebargle79 (talk) 22:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Command & Conquer: Remastered Collection has been accepted[edit]

Command & Conquer: Remastered Collection, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buffalo police shoving incident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WKBW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Esther[edit]

Can you outline why you believe Debresser's recent edits to the page improve things by removing all mention of the ahistoricity of Esther from the lead and depriving the reader of it any help in understanding that Esther is fictional? I think the layout before this obvious attempt to conceal this information further down the article was better, don't you? GPinkerton (talk) 17:05, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the previous layout was better; that's why I moved it back. It's exactly the same info, so it wouldn't be "depriving the reader of it any help in understanding that Esther is fictional"; the only difference is it's further down and in its own section. David O. Johnson (talk) 17:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The lead is supposed to summarize the article. At present nothing in the lead tells the reader that Esther is fictional character in a historical novel. It presently reads as though Esther was a historical person. That needs to be rectified to avoid being grossly misleading. GPinkerton (talk) 17:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of Bobby Koeble (Death) - Death Metal[edit]

Bobby Koeble was a member of the Death Metal Band death. His contributions to the group were valid, real and substantial enough that Death Metal fans know his reputation. The sources provided ground his presence in the band. The link to his page should be returned. Theclevertwit (talk) 22:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which article are you referring to? David O. Johnson (talk) 22:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR and covid-19[edit]

Please note there is a great deal of publicly available information on Covid-19, even on Wikipedia. The information is on official CDC website, which is where one is supposed to go for such things,[25] [26] and therefore is not considered WP:OR under the rules. However I did add a couple of references. Have a nice day and stay well.Arglebargle79 (talk) 13:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

muttations[edit]

Hi, in The Hunger Games the muttations are spelled this way in the novel and film. Please do not modify the correct spelling. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 21:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction. It was an honest mistake. David O. Johnson (talk) 22:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

I apologise for accusting you of stealing credit for answering. I swear the question was unanswered when I editted. I don't know how this happened. Mèþru (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It happens. Don't worry about it. David O. Johnson (talk) 15:22, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open[edit]

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

You are spoiling the whole movie Superman Prime One Million (talk) 10:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read through this:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spoiler David O. Johnson (talk) 10:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

Hi - an editor with your experience doesn't need an edit warring template, but at Cabinet of Joe Biden - cut it out. You want the material to be removed, so unless you think it's a BLP violation or vandalism or similar, there's not WP:3RRNO exception. Please take it to the talk page. GirthSummit _(blether) 11:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ho Ho[edit]

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

Discussion at Talk:New Hope (Israel) § "Right-wing"[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:New Hope (Israel) § "Right-wing". ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:50, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing[edit]

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

"Next Algerian presidential election" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Next Algerian presidential election. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 6#Next Algerian presidential election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 20:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yamina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page N12.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship in the United States[edit]

Hello, a pleasure to greet you by taking a look at that article mentioned, I observe that they omit to add the censorship that the president is experiencing https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-inaugurations-media-social-media-censorship-a4a02aca8341a844c011d4e165d8d61b --Secretsgenius (talk) 04:29, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

National Popular Vote Interstate Compact[edit]

Hi David O. Johnson! I noticed that you reverted my edit to National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. I also note that you marked my edit as spam.

I added an external link to a video which describes the subject of the article very well. I did this as there was no video explanation of the subject. I have seen such links to YouTube videos on many pages before, especially when the video in question supported the subject.

Would you mind explaining your reasoning for reverting the edit? Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 13:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Political parties in Egypt that have former NDP members has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Political parties in Egypt that have former NDP members has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 15:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English variants[edit]

Hi, I noticed in this edit on the page for the Israeli Labor Party that you changed "center" to "centre". Please note that changing English variants is usually considered unnecessary (see MOS:RETAIN). Additionally, the page itself has a template near the top to "Use American English" to stay consistent with the article title, which is based on the party's own English website. I've changed it back to say "center". Thanks, Ezhao02 (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yesh Atid–Telem[edit]

Hi

Like to Yesh Atid–Telem, should we create Labor-Gesher and Labor-Gesher-Meretz? --Panam2014 (talk) 11:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they're necessary. The info can be in the Labor article, etc. David O. Johnson (talk) 11:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We have still Labor-Gesher. Should we rename to Labor-Gesher-Meretz or to Labor-Meretz? --Panam2014 (talk) 12:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Collective nouns[edit]

Hi David. Just an FYI, 'the family live' is perfectly acceptable – family is a collective noun in British English which means it can be used as a plural or singular with no real right or wrong. (Apologies if this is patronising, but I have no idea what nationality you are!). Cheers, Number 5 7 01:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I see the IP is riding roughshod over any attempts to fix what they've done, so I'm going to leave it for a while until they move on to another article. Number 5 7 01:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the heads up. Not to suck up too much, but thanks for what you do. David O. Johnson (talk) 01:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive[edit]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 California gubernatorial recall election[edit]

Hello. I have reverted your edit just because spacing is already present between the comment and the Polling section, double-spacing makes a new, blank line and it is something that you don't want on an article. In the future, you should check for these kinds of things because spacing may be already present. Thanks, Vacant0 (talk) 19:21, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 California gubernatorial recall election[edit]

What's the point removing redundant references about the recall process? There is no harm. They are from different sources, authorities, and with different accounting of the facts, and redundancy preserve the record where links may be dropped. Please revert.

I replied to you on the 2021 California gubernatorial recall election talk page. David O. Johnson (talk) 02:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2024 president[edit]

Warren has said she will run for reelection in 2024 and help Biden win reelection. Politico reported this. I can understand why you got rid of my declared, I understand my mistake there (I realize he said my PLAN is to run for reelection). AOC hasn't said she will or won't and Kamala Harris is there because she might run if Biden doesn't. Elizabeth warren downplayed the claims she would run in 2024 (politico), by saying she will run for reelection for 2022 U.S senator from Massachusetts in 2024 (politico, CNN, NY Post)\

Thank you, hope you understand and no I didn't delete elizabeth warren a second time

Elizabeth Warren is not running for president in 2024, she is running for reelection.

Bullying Behavior and Personal Attacks[edit]

Hello I see you have a history of bullying editors and engaging in personal attacks. Please familiarize yourself with the purpose of talk pages. You have been repeatedly warned by several editors and Admins on several occasions about your reference to Talk Page discussions as "vandalism". This is highly inappropriate and uncivilized and does not belong in Wikipedia as a rule as well as my personal opinion on this matter. On an unrelated topic, I think it is also highly inappropriate for you to use a specific real name of a living person "David O. Johnson" (which is not your real name) as your wikipedia ID. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xoltron (talk • contribs) 15:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which occasions are you referring to? How do you know that it is or is not my real name? That may count as WP:ASPERSIONS. David O. Johnson (talk) 00:05, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Xoltron: please sign your posts properly. There is no notable person with an article on Wikipedia by the name of "David O. Johnson", so I really don't see your point about this editor's name. If you actually have a problem with it, WP:UAA is thataway. Elizium23 (talk) 00:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Xoltron is apparently referencing a discussion on the talk page of Qasem Soleimani that happened a year and a half ago. It has made some weird remarks on my talk page today as well. Axedel (talk) 00:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New MK Articles[edit]

Hey dude just wanted to let you know that I saw you created new articles for the new MK's today. Just note you mixed up Yisrael Beitinu and Yesh Atid. Fixed it for you. Idan (username is Zvikorn) (talk) 10:29, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fixes. David O. Johnson (talk) 18:41, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

National Popular Vote Interstate Compact Section 2[edit]

"Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. David O. Johnson (talk) 22:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)"

"It is not so called vandalism m8 it is called adding helpful information so if a nickname that appeared in popular media in this case a CGP Grey video with millions of views it should be allowed to be added to a wiki enter page as an alternate title to help people find the article in question. Thank you Quasarsavage (talk) 23:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)"

"Hello?"

"See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUX-frlNBJY thanks currently 4.1M views"

Without Remorse (film)[edit]

An editor changed the title of article in the lead again[27] repeating a change that you reverted once already.[28]

I'm fairly sure your edit was correct and the other editor is wrong but I cannot fully explain why. I would appreciate if you could explain on the article Talk page why exactly he's wrong and based on what guidelines. I also think he might be making his changes based on the false assumption that there is a connection between the film and the Amazon Jack Ryan series TV when the two productions were entirely separate and there is no connection between the two. Thanks. -- 109.77.200.34 (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Israeli legislative election[edit]

Hello, David, you removed the Benjamin Netanyahu template I added to the article. In your edit summary, you stated, "removed unhelpful link". Not sure what you mean by that. In what way is the template not helpful when the article does concern Netanyahu and the template has relevancy? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It actually doesn't as he's the only Israel politician to have a template on Wikipedia. Not sure where the NPOV comes in. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?[edit]

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 15:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of Patrick J. Donahoe[edit]

Hello, you and I have gone back and forth on a couple of edits and I wanted to point a few things out:

None of the currently cited biographies list the names of his children. Since they're minors, I've removed them to prevent further issues. The family has received death threats in light of recent publicity and continuing to allow the children's names to be published is inviting further negative attention. Please respect the family's wishes.

Thank you for your consideration.

It would be better to discuss it on the article's Talk page. David O. Johnson (talk) 22:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jarabulus Brigade logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jarabulus Brigade logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Al-Qassas Army.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Al-Qassas Army.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia ZA Annual General Meeting 2021[edit]

This is just to let you know that the Wikimedia ZA AGM will be taking place on 25 September 2021 See below for more details.

Time: Saturday, 25 September 2021, starts at 10:00 to 16:00. With intermission at 13:00
Location: held digitally online this link

Survey about History on Wikipedia[edit]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pic[edit]

You know there’s a Randy Rhodes pic do blurry that even it’s cropped I’m not not gonna argue here because it will turn into a edit war and I’ll probably be blocked. So have this your way. I’m not gonna edit it any further cause I already know I’ll end up in deep %%%%. So anyways not gonna waste the time anymore. Thanks A.R.M. 13:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bullet for My Valentine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Don't Walk Away and Eye Spy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Zandberg as a retiring MK[edit]

Hey David, i saw that you recently reverted an edit of mine at 2022 Israeli legislative election. I think we should discuss the removal and the criteria for the inclusion of retiring incumbents. The list also includes Issawi Frej, who hasn't been an MK since 2021 as a consequence of the Norwegian law. The list relates to retiring incumbents, but not exclusively incumbent MKs. Should the list include retiring individuals who are not members of the Knesset as a consequence of the Norwegian Law on account of notability? We could also rename the section to Retiring MKs or Retiring Members of the Knesset. I wasn't sure whether to discuss this here or on the talk page but regardless. Totalstgamer (talk) 18:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. I think it'd be better to continue the discussion on the articles' talk page. David O. Johnson (talk) 19:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to mention a couple days back that i opened a discussion on the article's talk page, we should probably reach a consensus before the end of the month since there might be more retirements by then Totalstgamer (talk) 14:26, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DNF engine version[edit]

Hi David! I opened a new topic on Duke Nukem Forever's talk page. WolfmanFP (talk) 00:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tara Sweeney[edit]

Why did you re-add the section saying Tara Sweeney defeated Begich and Palin? She didn’t even run in the run-off. Please double check before reverting someone’s edit. There is still no citation on the claim, and there can’t be, because Sweeney dropped out before ranked choice voting began. Cprice45 (talk) 03:50, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I misread it. David O. Johnson (talk) 03:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, you didn’t, I did, actually, and I have already gone back and added clarity to avoid further confusion. Thank you for your due diligence! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cprice45 (talk • contribs) 04:06, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The way it was previously written, the "she" could have referred to either Peltola or Sweeney. Thanks for clarifying the wording; it needed it. David O. Johnson (talk) 04:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bayit Yehudi leadership[edit]

The single source you added is incorrect. Brodny is not head of the party, just head of the election party list, whilst Hagit Moshe is still chairperson. Usually party leaders in Israel do both, this is a rare exception. Source: As revealed on INN: Yossi Brodny elected to head Jewish Home Party. Please correct relevant articles. DGtal (talk) 06:47, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. There are three other sources (at least) that indicate Brodny is currently party chair:

[Jewish Press https://www.jewishpress.com/news/politics/jonathan-pollard-endorses-ayelet-shaked-she-knows-she-made-mistakes/2022/08/30/]

[The Jerusalem Post https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-715770]

[Arutz Sheva https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/359394].

It's illogical to use an older source for a claim when more recent sources (including one from the same website) disprove the claim you're making. David O. Johnson (talk) 23:55, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I knew I was right all the way, but had little time to find a current article of a journalist who actually knows the nuances. Luckily the wait turned out for the best and a day ago the party send a public announcement source:

הודעה מטעם יו"ר מפלגת הבית היהודי חגית משה: יו"ר הבית היהודי חגית משה, יו"ר רשימת הבית היהודי יוסי ברודני ומנכ"ל המפלגה יגאל דנינו מכנסים בשעה זאת את מוסדות המפלגה ובכללם נשיאות המפלגה וחברי המזכירות ומביאים לאישוררם את ההסכם המתגבש אל מול שרת הפנים איילת שקד בדבר הקמת רשימה משותפת של הבית היהודי יחד עם מפלגתה של איילת שקד.

I don't know how good your Hebrew is but the message clearly states that Moshe is chairperson of the party and Brodny is chairperson of the party list. I hope this clears up matters. 05:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

That settles it. I appreciate the clarification. David O. Johnson (talk) 05:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for everything. Could you update the relevant articles? DGtal (talk) 09:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll work on it. David O. Johnson (talk) 03:22, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DGtal, I've updated The Jewish Home, Hagit Moshe and Yossi Brodny. I think that covers it. David O. Johnson (talk) 04:54, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cite format[edit]

Thanks for the CN cites, but they should be dated w/mo & yr Activist (talk) 16:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The bot does that part automatically. David O. Johnson (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just discovered that. I had been recently running into old ones whose placements predated the advent of the bot, so I'd either been posting the citations or dating the original requests. Thanks much. Activist (talk) 17:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zionist Spirit for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zionist Spirit, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zionist Spirit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Hey I'm sorry I had a warning template here but I see you're not a new user. You shouldn't blank a redirect to delete it. You need to nominate it for deletion. Andre🚐 00:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pinocchio's Revenge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Child's Play.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. Thank you for your work on Zvika Fogel. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. Thank you for your work on Moshe Solomon. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. Thank you for your work on Sharon Nir. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings[edit]

Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} [reply]

Donner60 (talk) 04:39, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail[edit]

Hello, David O. Johnson. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.ARamadan-WMF (talk) 12:50, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The Marksman (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect The Marksman (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 27 § The Marksman (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marianne Williamson 2024 presidential campaign (March 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marianne Williamson 2024 presidential campaign and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, David O. Johnson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Egyptian Renaissance Party[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Egyptian Renaissance Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Star Mississippi 20:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perry Johnson[edit]

David O. Johnson,

Why you add Perry Johnson in section ,,Major declared candidates'' on page 2024 Republican Party presidential primaries?

Sorry, but because you have same surname are you in a same family?

Duosdebs01 (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No relation. David O. Johnson (talk) 11:54, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Johnson is one of the most common surnames in America... IEditPolitics (talk) 17:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spam?[edit]

You reverted two of my edits and considered them spam. I was just trying to add new references. I will never try to add spam to Wikipedia.

I apologize if I have broken any rules. Soyescritor (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edit on Reddit article[edit]

Hi,

Just noticed you reverted my edit. First, I'd like to respectfully point you to WP:NOTRELIABLE and potentially WP:BLPSELFPUB. There's little point in arguing or pointlessly edit warring, so I'm just going to leave it as is and just leave this note instead.

The argument is semantic, that's fair, but it's not an accurate statement. The apps were, in fact, capable, for the low price of millions of dollars a year (sarcasm very much intended), of remaining online. Like I said, semantics, but technically the authors shut down, not Reddit. Toxictaru (talk) 10:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2024 Republican Party presidential debates and forums[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Republican Party presidential debates and forums, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2024 USA Election primaries[edit]

Hi! This is regarding my edits on the 2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries and 2024 Republican Party presidential primaries. You've reverted both of them citing that it was vandalism and non-alphabetical order fix. Kindly explain yourself as these difference revisions prove that I've done exactly that : 1 2. Thanks. ChaitanyaJo (talk) 09:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on 2024 Republican Party presidential primaries made Hutchinson the first candidate, followed by Christie:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries&oldid=1167989536

That's not alphabetical order, by last name. David O. Johnson (talk) 12:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't alphabetical order apply to the first names. Even then, what's the problem with the democratic primaries? ChaitanyaJo (talk) 12:20, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's the exact same issue.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1167989554

It's supposed to be sorted by last name, alphabetically. David O. Johnson (talk) 12:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Then it seems to be a misunderstanding. Here, the convention is to alphabetize by first name but it appears that the last name one is followed more. Thanks! ChaitanyaJo (talk) 16:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where consensus?[edit]

Where was the concensus gained for Perry Johnson to be a major candidate, which archive is it, because i looked, and all i saw was consensus that the criteria to be a major candidate shouldn't be changed, and he doesn't meet the criteria. LordEnma8 (talk) 00:27, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@David O. Johnson: LordEnma8 (talk) 22:38, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gar Samuelson[edit]

In this edit to Gar Samuelson, reverting the removal of "jazz fusion", you said that you "will add refs on it". You gave one in a subsequent edit summary, but all that states is that he "started out as a jazz drummer", without giving any details (and it's in a book named Rock Obituaries, which doesn't sound like a good location for information on jazz!). Are there more sources for him being a professional jazz musician or jazz being a significant part of his professional playing experience? EddieHugh (talk) 21:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be adding a couple more refs soon. David O. Johnson (talk) 05:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Enrique Tarrio. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Hi David this edit is the fourth time you reverted on Enrique Tarrio within a 24 hour period. You need to self-revert immediately. TarnishedPath^talk 23:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. TarnishedPath^talk 02:34, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hirsh Singh[edit]

Hello, I am interested in why you removed my reference to Hirsh Singh in the article about the 2024 republican primaries. Casper king (talk) 13:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained in the edit summary [29], Hirsh Singh is not a notable candidate. He doesn't have a Wikipedia article, as the other candidates in the "Other declared candidates" section do. David O. Johnson (talk) 17:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Business Insider[edit]

Re this edit. Please read WP:BUSINESSINSIDER. It's not a reliable source. Please self-revert. Thanks. Kire1975 (talk) 20:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It can be usable, per the Legend [30]

"The source is marginally reliable (i.e. neither generally reliable nor generally unreliable), and may be usable depending on context. Editors may not have been able to agree on whether the source is appropriate, or may have agreed that it is only reliable in certain circumstances. It may be necessary to evaluate each use of the source on a case-by-case basis while accounting for specific factors unique to the source in question. Carefully review the Summary column of the table for details on the status of the source and the factors that should be considered." David O. Johnson (talk) 20:19, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What context exactly? Kire1975 (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REDLINK[edit]

Please see WP:REDLINK for why red links in articles are a good thing; they get articles written and help Wikipedia grow.^[1] The concept of an inner cabinet is well established, and there are plenty of resources (see, for example, this book search) from which an article could be fashioned. Would you mind reinstating my edit, please? — The Anome (talk) 16:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks. David O. Johnson (talk) 16:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You undid my sourced corrections on an article[edit]

Hi, twice today have I corrected Amihai Eliyahu’s name in his article - all sources in the article itself give his first name in English as Amichai, not Amihai. You undid both my edits, which were sourced - and which are correct - without any justification. Would you please dedicate a minute to check that my edits were actually correct and that his name is actually spelled Amichai in English, and fix it in the article? Thank you very much. 2A02:14F:1EE:AC98:7482:8FF2:3489:859D (talk) 19:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Verb[edit]

What's the point of reverting this? I don't think it violates NPOV to describe a kidnapping as such. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Megadeth Line-up[edit]

Why do you keep removing Teemu as the Megadeth guitarist? Megadeth themselves are the supreme authority on who their members are, and their website lists Teemu as their new guitarist. Kiko is listed under "line-up history" as a part of a previous line-up, not the current one.^[2] Dave has also said they will be moving forward with Teemu as the new guitarist. Kiko is not a current member, and therefore should not be listed as one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.133.113 (talk) 21:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Diomidis Spinellis and Panagiotis Louridas (August 2008). "The collaborative organization of knowledge". Communications of the ACM. Vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 68–73. doi:10.1145/1378704.1378720. Most new articles are created shortly after a corresponding reference to them is entered into the system. See also Wikipedia:Inflationary hypothesis of Wikipedia growth.
^ https://www.megadeth.com/pages/line-up-history

Colorado stay[edit]

I was just about to add the clarification myself, but you beat me to it. Thank you! 😊 Prcc27 (talk) 02:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. It's definitely interesting to watch it all unfold. David O. Johnson (talk) 02:26, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you![edit]

		The Yemen Barnstar of National Merit
		Your dedication towards editing the Houthi involvement in the Israel–Hamas war article has earned you this barnstar. Keep up the amazing work! Abo Yemen ✉ 18:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2024 Yemen airstrikes[edit]

On 12 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Yemen airstrikes, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 08:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Attacks on the MV Maersk Hangzhou[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Attacks on the MV Maersk Hangzhou—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of Important Information in the Knesset Page[edit]

I have included the historic name of Givat Ram, where the Knesset is situated. It is important to at least briefly include that the Knesset was built on a destroyed village called Sheikh Badr. The addition I made was fair and unbiased and only states historic facts without any personal opinions seeping into it. Including the historical name of what used to be a village is crucial to help the reader understand the politics and history of the area of which the Knesset is situated on. Reversing this information is an active attempt at censoring information which is very important to some people such as the past inhabitants of Sheikh Badr or their descendants. What I have added does not constitute as vandalism, just briefly including the historic name when talking about Givat Ram. PixelationPro (talk) 19:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cenk[edit]

By the same logic of removing Cenk, wouldn't you all remove Williamson and Phillips? Neither of them are so-called "major" either. But those two with Cenk all participated in the same forum not all that long ago. Biden refuses to debate any. So I believe all three belong in the chart or not at all! — Preceding unsigned comment added by FightingWhales (talk • contribs) 21:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phillips is definitely a major candidate, as he's a sitting House member. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The stated requirements are that a candidate has to meet one of the following:

Receive substantial major media coverage
are or have been elected to major public office such as president, vice president, governor, U.S. senator or U.S. representative
have been included in at least five national polls

Uygur has not been elected to any public office, so he doesn't meet (2). Additionally, he has only been included in 3 polls, so he doesn't meet (3). However, he has received some media coverage, so he could meet (1), but it's unclear. We had a discussion, and I argued that he should be included, but I was in the minority, and it was clear that there was no consensus that he met (1). Since he doesn't meet (1), (2), or (3), he is not a major candidate per these requirements.

Notice that nowhere in these requirements does it say anything about participating in debates. Just because a candidate participated in a debate does not mean they are a major candidate, and not participating in the debate does not exclude them from being a major candidate.

Biden, Williamson, and Phillips are clearly major. Biden is a sitting US President and former Vice President and U.S. Senator, meeting requirement (1). He also has been included in more than 5 polls and has received substantial media coverage, so he meets (2) and (3) as well. Additionally, Phillips is a sitting U.S. representative, and has been included in over 5 polls, so he's clearly notable as well. Williamson has received media coverage, although less than Phillips and Biden, and has been included in over 5 polls, so she too is notable. However, for the reasons discussed above, Cenk Uygur, at the moment, is not.

In addition to the fact that Uygur does not meet the requirements to become a major candidate, he also does not appear to meet the constitutional requirements to become President of the United States, as he is not a natural-born citizen.^[1] While this does not mean he should be excluded from being a major candidate, it does make the calculus more difficult. In the previous discussion, multiple editors indicated that this ineligibility was a reason why they opposed including Uygur as a major candidate. Even if we accept that it is not Wikipedia's job to determine if Uygur is a major candidate, or that we shouldn't assume that he'll lose in court on the question, Uygur has also not made the ballot, for various reasons, in 25 states so far, while only making the ballot in 8 states. Even if he makes the ballot in every state where the filing deadline has not passed (and he didn't turn in any signatures in Rhode Island, so that's not off to a good start and won't happen), it's very difficult to argue that we should include Uygur as a major candidate when half of the country will not even see him as an option, and it isn't even possible for him to win the nomination outright.^[2]

All this being said, however, the current policies don't have any provisions relating to whether a candidate can win or is eligible to be president. As long as they are either covered by the media, included in five polls, or held elected office, they can be included. As discussed above, Uygur has not been included in five polls, is not an elected official, and the current consensus is that he does not have enough media coverage to be considered a major candidate. However, consensus can change, and it's possible that it has since the previous discussion. Additionally, the requirements could be modified to allow another recourse for a candidate like Uygur to be considered major. If you wish to do this, the best avenue is to familiarize yourself with talk page guidelines and then create a new discussion promoting Uygur to be a major candidate. This will allow editors to share their input and we'll see what happens with the consensus. For the reasons shared above, I don't think that the discussion will cause any change, but if you want to open one, feel free. Again, however, debates have nothing to do with it.

TLDR

Uygur is not a major candidate because consensus says he doesn't have enough media coverage; debates have nothing to do with it
Williamson, Phillips, and Biden are major candidates because they are options in polls and Phillips and Biden are sitting public officials
Uygur is not eligible to be president and has missed the ballot in 25 states
If you think Uygur has enough media coverage to be a major candidate, start a talk page discussion and talk about all the coverage he's gotten.

~Politicdude (About me, talk, contribs) 04:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Cenk Uygur Claims He's Able To Run For President. Experts And The Constitution Say He Cannot Become President". checkyourfact.com. Retrieved 2024-01-20.
^ The states he has been disqualified in are worth 2,455 delegates, leaving him with only 1,481 possible delegates he can still gain. There are 3,936 delegates, and a majority is required to win, which is 1,969. If no one gets a majority on the first ballot, it goes to a second round, where 738 superdelegates can vote. The new majority threshold is 2,338, and even if all superdelegates vote for Uygur, he's at 2,219, meaning he can't win the nomination without votes from delegates pledged to other candidates (or uncommitted) or a win as a write-in, which isn't even possible in many states.

Nomination of Chris Williams (metal drummer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Williams (metal drummer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Williams (metal drummer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision of my edit on 2024/02/16[edit]

Hello, at 7:04, you un-did my edit on 2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries, why? The link I edited ( 2024 Democrats Abroad presidential primary ) redirects to 2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries#Primaries and caucus calendar, the very paragraph the reader is on when clicking this link, which I find not very useful and surprising. Could you justify your reversion? Can I put back the link to Democrats abroad, or at least rid this text of any link? Kindly,
Blocktomo (talk) 07:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

There's a draft article that's specific to the 2024 Democrats Abroad primary, here: Draft:2024 Democrats Abroad presidential primary. I'll try to get more information added to it (the submission of that article was declined nine days ago). I think it's better to have the redirect for now, as it exists: [31], rather than linking to the generic Democrats Abroad wikilink. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to call more experienced wikipedians out of curiosity.

Please, please, do not consider this as an attempt to Discredit you in any way, in my point of view, I am merely trying to learn more on wikipedia's principles, as a new member myself.

@Robert McClenon and @Lightoil

Dear Lightoil and Robert McClenon,

Recently, Mr. Johnson and I were having a discussion as to wether a link to a future article should be kept, or if it shoud only be added once established.

David O. Johnson, the reason I bring the subject to more experienced Wikipedians is that I have had the same train of thought as you not so long ago on french wikipedia, where I edit mostly, and an elder kindly explained to me the proper way to do things.

Robert McClenon, Lightoil, you have rejected twice Draft:2024 Democrats Abroad presidential primary, so if I make an analogy to what I have learned on french Wikipedia, my point would be the valid one: no redirection should be created until the article of which we speak is effectively created and verified as meeting Wikipedia's notability standards,

is this correct?

Thank you for your help,

Thank you, dear David O. Johnson, for your consideration and patience,

Kindly,

Blocktomo (talk) 22:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Blocktomo: I agree with David O. Johnson just keep it as a redirect for now till the draft is moved to mainspace. Lightoil (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Blocktomo - I don't understand the question. Please rephrase it for me. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My question is the one which opened this topic : Right now, on 2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries#Primaries and caucus calendar, there is a link to 2024 Democratic Party presidential primaries#Primaries and caucus calendar attached to the text "Democrats Abroad". I suggested putting a link to Democrats Abroad, or at least clear the text of any valuable link, but David O. Johnson and Lightoil seem to think it is okay this redirection is present in the text.

For me, this is contrary to any Wikipedia Typography Guideline, since the reader is deceived upon clicking on the hyperlink over "Democrats Abroad", thinking it will lead them to the "Democrats Abroad" page.

Could you infirm or confirm my doubt?

Thank you,

Blocktomo (talk) 22:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Blocktomo - I looked at it. It is a stupid self-referential redirect link. If I click on it, it takes me right back to where I had been. But the links for some other states do the same thing if the articles on their primaries have not yet been written. The same thing happens if I click on Maryland and District of Columbia, the two that are of most interest to me. I think that those three links, and any other links that behave in the same way, should be revised, but if they are left as is, at least for now, I don't think that one of them should be changed unless they are all changed to do something less stupid. Am I sort of answering the question? Robert McClenon (talk) 16:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I am DONE with this edit warring.[edit]

Brad Little probably meant that he would endorse Trump in the general. He so far has not endorsed a candidate, and if he did it has not been covered by reliable sources. Nonetheless, I will quit edit warring. Petjayso (talk) 05:47, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cropped logo of Egyptian Patriotic Movement.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cropped logo of Egyptian Patriotic Movement.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaii caucuses[edit]

Howdy David. Shouldn't 2024 Hawaii Democratic presidential caucus be moved the plural 2024 Hawaii Democratic presidential caucuses? -- GoodDay (talk) 16:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be moved, thanks. David O. Johnson (talk) 16:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subject of disagreement[edit]

Hey, I've noticed you're on the wiki page for the B&W party, and I was wondering if you could help me solve a consensus question regarding it's positions.

Thanks. Mr manor11 (talk) 22:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the way it is now looks fine. It's all sourced. David O. Johnson (talk) 04:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFK Jr[edit]

I don't think it's undue. Given the fact he has received much more publicity and headlines, and has much higher poll numbers than any of the other 3rd party/independents, I think it's appropriate he have his own section. Lumping him in with all the other ones undercuts where he is in the race. Vjmlhds (talk) 23:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be best to comment on the article talk page. David O. Johnson (talk) 23:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

POV pushing on Israeli parties[edit]

Hello – thanks for your reverts on a couple of Israel party articles. There seems to have been a concerted push from a couple of editors to move nearly every party over one place on the political spectrum (which I noted at WT:Israel). Worth keeping an eye on – there is at least one live discussion ongoing (at Talk:Yesh Atid). Cheers, Number 5 7 23:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting reason for Abdullah Zeydan page[edit]

Hi, please explain why you're reverting edits in your edit summary. Your edit summary is insufficient (for me); "Removed unrelated info; spacing".

This was one of the reasons for his arrest and got a lot attention from media. I believe this pretty related and worth to mention in the page. Throat0390 (talk) 10:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at X-Men '97. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. "Acclaim" is attributed to multiple sources. Read the article. ภץאคгöร 18:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That particular edit on the X-Men '97 article was well within Wikipedia policies,especially MOS:PUFFERY. David O. Johnson (talk) 18:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UCveugU_i0&t=49m15s

[spinellis-2] Diomidis Spinellis and Panagiotis Louridas (August 2008). "The collaborative organization of knowledge". Communications of the ACM. Vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 68–73. doi:10.1145/1378704.1378720. Most new articles are created shortly after a corresponding reference to them is entered into the system. See also Wikipedia:Inflationary hypothesis of Wikipedia growth.

[3] ttps://www.megadeth.com/pages/line-up-history

[4] "Cenk Uygur Claims He's Able To Run For President. Experts And The Constitution Say He Cannot Become President". checkyourfact.com. Retrieved 2024-01-20.

[5] The states he has been disqualified in are worth 2,455 delegates, leaving him with only 1,481 possible delegates he can still gain. There are 3,936 delegates, and a majority is required to win, which is 1,969. If no one gets a majority on the first ballot, it goes to a second round, where 738 superdelegates can vote. The new majority threshold is 2,338, and even if all superdelegates vote for Uygur, he's at 2,219, meaning he can't win the nomination without votes from delegates pledged to other candidates (or uncommitted) or a win as a write-in, which isn't even possible in many states.

[1]

[1]

[2]

[1]

[2]