User talk:BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU

Welcome![edit]

Hello, BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bendru Theertha Irde, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained. a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sunmist3 (talk) 04:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bendru Theertha Irde[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bendru Theertha Irde requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20160803034916/http://www.karnataka.com/mangalore/bendru-theertha/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sunmist3 (talk) 04:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will editing the content --BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (talk) 04:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Bendru Theertha Irde, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Sunmist3 (talk) 04:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Puttur, Karnataka, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Campco has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 21:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:14, Friday, August 26, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

August 2016[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Puttur, Karnataka. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please review the messages left for you thus far and ensure that future changes are supported by reliable third party sources. The bulk of your recent changes to this article have been unsupported. Thank you, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sullia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content, refusal to discuss.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16543 was submitted on Sep 16, 2016 06:54:24. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16556 was submitted on Sep 19, 2016 15:21:14. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16633 was submitted on Oct 02, 2016 03:40:20. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17324 was submitted on Jan 14, 2017 15:24:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for the disruptive into your Wikipedia. I was unjust in my reverts . I have learned from this experience, It never happen in future days, please unblock me. Preceding unsigned comment added by BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (talk • contribs) 07:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're actually blocked for adding unsourced content and a refusal to discuss. In your next unblock request, I suggest you respond to these points. PhilKnight (talk) 03:51, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Requesting unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, my account was blocked sometime ago. At that time I was a newby to Wikipedia, I did not know how to edit wikipedia, and also did not know about policies such as verifiability. Currently I have gained more experience by attending a couple of Wikipedia workshop and editing Indic language Wikipedia. I request admins of English Wikipedia to unblock my account. I will improve my editing skill. I will follow Wikipedia policies. Thanks. BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (talk) 09:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You still haven't addressed your previous refusal to discuss problems, when they are raised to you. Yamla (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am extremely sorry for not replying. At the time I was very new on English wiki, so added outsourced content, now attended couple of workshops, meetup and there were senior Wikipedians had discussed an importance of rules and policies. Regards BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (talk) 08:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Unblocked per our discussion below and approval from the blocking admin. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:28, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a case of WP:IDHT, so I have revoked talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 13:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yamla, thanks for your attention, but I am unsure why you revoked talk page access too. --Tito Dutta (talk) 13:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The unblock declines have addressed the problem with "a refusal to discuss". The user has continued to avoid that issue in their unblock requests. The next reviewing admin is very welcome to reopen the talk page if they believe it's likely a fourth unblock request would address this issue. --Yamla (talk) 13:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am a bit confused, this guy has replied to the last 2 posts, how is it a "a refusal to discuss", I think this guy is improving WP:AGF. --Tito Dutta (talk) 14:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a refusal to discuss the block, it's a refusal to discuss the unsourced content, when challenged. However, as you clearly believe I shouldn't have revoked talk page access, I have reinstated it. The blocked user is once again free to comment here and to make additional unblock requests if the currently active one is declined. --Yamla (talk) 14:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to extend some rope and grant this request. They've made an effort to improve their previous policy short-comings by attending meet-ups etc. They at least deserve a chance to show us they can do better. Pinging @Yamaguchi先生: as the original blocking admin for their input.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you all for pinging me for consideration. I have no objection to providing Bharathesha Alasandemajalu with the opportunity to address past issues with hopes that they may productively contribute in the future. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 01:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shivarama Karantha Balavana[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shivarama Karantha Balavana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 19:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Your addition to Vishu has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tulu Gowda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pepper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Karavali Wikimedians Outreach[edit]

Template:Karavali Wikimedians Outreach has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TheImaCow (talk) 08:33, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amara Sullia Freedom Movement of 1837, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puttur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amara Sullia Rebellion for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amara Sullia Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amara Sullia Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chidananda Kampa (talk) 16:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mangalore Amateur Radio Club[edit]

The article Mangalore Amateur Radio Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Fram Mangalore Amateur Radio Club is one of the most active ham clubs in India. The club has significant coverage in this region and is actively involved in educating and advocating for society. Similar Ham radio clubs and societies are here. We have added enough live, reliable sources to this article. Please review the proposed deletion BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (talk) 16:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shivarama Karantha Balavana[edit]

The article Shivarama Karantha Balavana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the sources are reliable, independent, and about the home or location at the same time. It seems as if the only sources about this place are their own website, and this blog. No better sources found online either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tudar Parbo moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Tudar Parbo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mangalore Amateur Radio Club for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mangalore Amateur Radio Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangalore Amateur Radio Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Vishwanatha Badikana per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vishwanatha Badikana. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Allow me to clarify that the misunderstanding against me and the other usernames acting as Sock Pupptets is entirely without merit and investigation. I am an active member of the Tulu community and a part of the Karavali Wikimedian User Group. While it is true that several of us, who work as bankers, professors, and tech administrators, settled in the same city of Mangalore, this is merely due to the geographic proximity of our workplaces. As a close-knit community, we frequently come together for monthly meetups to discuss the development of our community, the Wiki Movement, and any new happenings in Wikimedia. All the mentioned accounts belong to real individuals who collaborate, co-create and contribute as a community. Moreover, all of the articles to which I have contributed are related to our area of expertise, and we have edited them with the utmost care and attention to detail. As experts in our field, we take pride in our ability to contribute to projects like Tulu, Kannada, English Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata, Meta Wiki, Translate Wiki, Kannada Wikisnary and more. Our primary goal is to improve the quality of content on these platforms and contribute to the Wikimedia movement in a meaningful way. Overview of my contributions to the Wikimedia community Overview of my contributions to the Wikimedia community *My global contributions is 12,645. *Contributed 13 articles to Kannada Wikipedia *Contributed 130 articles to Tulu Wikipedia *Contributed 16 articles to English Wikipedia *Contributed translatewiki more than 1500 edits *Contributed 3000+ images including SVG images to Wikimedia commons. Overall, I am proud to have played a role in the Wikimedia movement, contributing to the collective knowledge of humanity and promoting greater understanding and appreciation of our community. I am committed to continuing my contributions in the future and am excited about the possibilities that lie ahead. *Tulu Wikipedia was launched in 2016, and I am one of the highest contributors for tulu Incubator. [1] and Article in Wikimedia Blog * Participated in WikiConference India 2016 was on 5,6,7 August 2016 in Landran (Mohali), Chandigarh, India. * I am an active executive member of Karavali Wikimedian User Group * I am proud to have served as an organizing member for numerous events in the Karavali Wikimedian User Group, including our most recent successful development initiative. # Movement Charter Discourses # Feminism and Folklore 2023 # Karavali Wikimedians User Group, CIS A2K Bengaluru, Karnataka Arebhashe Samskruthi mathu Sahitya Academy, St Aloysius College (Autonomous) Mangaluru, are collaborating & conducting a one-day conclave seminar I have had the privilege of participating in several Wiki Movement conclaves and training sessions, which have significantly enriched my understanding and expertise in this field some are listed below * Participated in Copyright workshop: South India was conducted on 20-21 October 2018 at Bangalore * Participated TTT(Train The Trainers was took place on 25-28 January 2018 at Mysore Fortune JP Palace, Mysuru, Karnataka *Participated in Wikimedia Education SAARC conference was took place on 20-22 June 2019 at Christ University, Bangalore We have participated together in some events as a active members of Karavali Wikimedians and you can find a link to of them below #Wikimania Meetup 2022 at Mangaluru # Movement Charter Discourses #Wikiconference India 2016 #Wikimedia Education SAARC conference As an affiliate member and administrator of Tulu Wikipedia, I have a good understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I would like to reiterate that we are not using sock puppets or multiple accounts. Therefore, I kindly request that we be unblocked and allowed to contribute to the English Wikipedia." *User: BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU *User:ChiK *User: Preethika B *User: Vishwanatha Badikana Therefore, it is essential to emphasize that the accusation of me being a sock puppet is incorrect. We take our contributions to Wikipedia very seriously, using our real names and refraining from using pseudonyms. To validate my authenticity, you may review my IP address, email account, and physical location, which are all distinct from any other accounts. As members of the Tulu community and Karavali Wikimedian, we are committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and excellence in our contributions to Wikimedia. I have provided everything I could to establish my identity, which is separate from other accounts, which are individuals on their own. Let us know if anything more is needed or needs to be done and if needed other members of the community could be asked to confirm the identity. –BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (talk) 09:37, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed (entirely unambiguously) to Preethika B. Also, WP:WALLOFTEXT. Yamla (talk) 11:09, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom received convincing evidence that the editors listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vishwanatha Badikana/Archive are not the same person. We are downgrading the blocks for each to a block for disruptive meatpuppetry, including edit warring, article hijacking, and what appears to be some promotional editing; as well as failing to understand how notability functions here (see WP:42 for a very brief overview). Any administrator may process an unblock request accordingly, taking into account the specifics of each users' participation prior to the SPI.

BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU, please review the guide to appealing the blocks and then either use the {{unblock}} template or use the unblock ticket request system to request an unblock (with a preference to the former). You will need to appeal individually from any other user in the group listed in the SPI case above. Izno (talk) 20:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, please refer to the above Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vishwanatha Badikana/Archive and note that I am a different individual. I have always edited Wikipedia in accordance with its policies and guidelines, and have regularly attended user group monthly meetups and workshops to improve my editing skills. In early March 2023, I attended the 2nd Wikimedia Technology Summit which helped me gain a better understanding of the rules and policies governing Wikipedia projects. Additionally, I have discussed the importance of following these rules and policies with a senior Wikimedian, which has reinforced my commitment to editing Wikipedia responsibly. I assure you that I have not engaged in any disruptive behavior, such as meatpuppetry, edit warring, article hijacking, promotional editing. I respectfully request to be unblocked. Thank you. -BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (talk) 01:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

With the agreement of the blocking admin I will remove the block. 331dot (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the "senior Wikimedian" you have had a conversation with? 331dot (talk) 06:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 331dot,I had a conversation with THasan (WMF)| Mr. Tanveer Hasan, a senior Wikimedian --BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (talk) 11:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

THasan (WMF) I'd be interested in your feelings on this. Thanks in advance 331dot (talk) 12:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 331dot (talk), apologies for taking a long time to respond here. I personally know Bharatesha and have supported the Karavali Wikimedians User Group from initial days of planning, forming of an UG and pleased to see that they have sustained activities to engage with Tulu and Kannada Wikimedians.

Recently, I spoke and met with @BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU and apprised him of the different policies like Editing Policy, Disruptive Editing, and Edit Conflict which I know he has gone through and learned from. If necessary, I am willing to have more conversations with him and the other members of the Karavali Wikimedians UG regarding adherence to policies and ensure that they are not violated.

I request for your consideration as this group is new and they are learning about the different policies and the enforcement thereof on En.Wp. I want to assure that they are all real, doing important work and here for the right reasons.

I am enclosing an image [2] that has @BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU(extreme right)@Vishwanatha Badikana (extreme left) Kishore Kumar Sheni and myself in a Wikimedia event in Bangalore, India.

Please let me know if there is anything else that I can do to be of help. THasan (WMF) (talk) 10:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23 I'm inclined to resolve this by giving another chance, but I would like to hear any thoughts you have. Thanks. 331dot (talk) 13:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: I'm confused. I am not the blocking administrator. AFAIK, I've had nothing to do with this user or the SPI case.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please accept my apology for using your time, I think I had my wires crossed. I'll fix the request. 331dot (talk) 15:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Callanecc What do you think? 331dot (talk) 15:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm happy for an unblock with chance. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note this account is Technically indistinguishable from Preethika B. --Yamla (talk) 09:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean given the ArbCom information(and if you can't say, I understand) 331dot (talk) 09:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The technical details make it very clear these two accounts (at least) are either operated by one person or are operated by two people who are sharing a device. If the latter case is true, note that they have done so across multiple IP addresses. I also note they've edited the same articles, sometimes only seconds apart (see here). More than that, obviously the checkuser data can't say. From a behavioural point of view, I'll note that Preethika B specifically said WP:MEAT doesn't apply. I think the most optimistic view here is that WP:MEAT does apply. I have no objection if in your (collective) good judgment, you think this account should be unblocked. My goal here is to explain what I'm seeing, both the checkuser data and the very subjective behavioural data. I also, obviously, don't mean to step on ARBCOM's toes. Happy to answer follow-up questions. --Yamla (talk) 10:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Izno, Callanecc, and 331dot, As mentioned before, Karavali Wikimedians User Group and Tulu Wikipedia community as a small tight-knit community, we are focused on promoting Tulu language and culture, documenting living heritage, and writing articles on specific themes. I am one of the conveners of the Karavali Wikimedian User group and our members actively participate in different events and editathons.

We regularly introduced new users to our community, and it is possible that we used the same laptop, resulting in the inadvertent use of the same IP address, which is called MEAT. We have learned from this mistake, have spoken with other editors for insights and acknowledge it.

We kindly request that I be unblocked to allow us to continue contributing to Wikipedia, along with other members of the group.

Thank you for your consideration and look forward to your response.--BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (talk) 14:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla and 331dot: My understanding from the ArbCom information that was shared with me as the blocking admin (now CU) is that this was MEAT not SOCK. Based on the user's explanation immediately above, this explained why it looked like MEAT and with that understanding I am okay with an unblock. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tudar Parbo (August 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would happily accept this article if it would have been called Diwali in Tulunada and was written from that POV. Currently the way it is written, it is emphasizing that Tudar Parba is a different festival from Diwali but held during the same time. This is not backed up by almost any of the sources with all of the sources refering to it as Diwali in Tulunada and not Tudar Parba.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tudar Parbo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sohom (talk) 17:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sohom (talk) 17:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tudar Parbo[edit]

Hello, BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tudar Parbo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]