Talk:Make America Great Again

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Make America Great Again article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Mid-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Donald Trump Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Your current ad against Govenor De Santist!![edit]

I cannot believe that you would attack such a good example of the Republican Party!! It makes me wonder?????STOP attacking our own views and hopes!!! 2601:640:8580:15B0:105B:9A49:49CB:AE6A (talk) 15:56, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your current ad against Govenor De Santist!! */ Reply 2A00:1110:109:ED04:CD80:316C:105C:CE6E (talk) 09:54, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 October 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change the sentence: "Multiple journalists, scholars, and commentators have called the slogan racist, regarding it as dog-whistle politics and coded language.[2][3][4][5]" to "Some journalists, scholars, and commentators have expressed that in their opinion, the slogan may be racist, attempting to link it to dog-whistle politics and coded language."

Add, "Others, however, have interpreted the slogan entirely differently, saying it has "vision" to it and that it alludes to stronger economic times, employment opportunities, and security. [2] This wild dichotomy of interpretation both lends to the popularity of Trump's slogan just as much as its infamy, something that David Axelrod, former Chief of Staff to President Obama, credits to the flexibility and simplicity of the message, allowing it to resonate with specific target audiences. [2]" Dsexauer827 (talk) 09:15, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The first suggested change introduces a number of MOS:WEASEL words, which would no longer accurately reflect the definiteness of their conclusions. The second change, a suggested addition, would equate the reported opinions of people who are not journalists, scholars, or commentators, with those who are (for instance, the person reported as having used the term "vision" is an audio engineer). The language also introduces an analysis of the phrase not present in the source: that there is a "wild dichotomy of interpretation" and that the dichotomy "lend to the popularity" of the slogan. Pinchme123 (talk) 18:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"MAGA Communism" Section[edit]

There is currently a discussion on the Jackson Hinkle article about whether to include "MAGA Communism" in this article and remove it from that article. Here are the RS with more information about "MAGA Communism".[1][2] I would expect it to be in the "Derivative slogans" section. Alleycat1995 (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RE: moving MAGA Communism proposal

Just to say this was a suggestion I made and another contributor supported, but in hindsight based on the current length of the section it may be deemed inappropriate for MAGA, and instead better suited to Hinkle's page with a short reference in this one. I'd otherwise say on reflection it would be better suited to the References to the slogan by others section, or even a standalone section, given it's technically not a derivative of MAGA, but instead a "type of" MAGA politic. Pinging top contributors for comment.

@InvadingInvader @LM2000 @Davide King @Ylee @Neutrality @Andrewmcfar @Kches16414 @Chris Capoccia @Steveok1 @Marisauna CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 12:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with CommunityNotesContributor. As things stand, I do not think a full "MAGA Communism" article would be longer than this. It is also mainly associated with Hinkle (so I would oppose moving that section here on the same undue weight ground correctly argued by CommunityNotesContributor), and Haz does not have his own article yet. So other than having a little mention here, as suggested by CommunityNotesContributor, I think that is all we should do. I would wait some more time and more reliable sources coming out for a full article.
Davide King (talk) 14:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change: Los Angeles Times opinion columnist...both one of the worst campaign slogans ever the slogan and "a fabulous campaign slogan"... To: Los Angeles Times opinion columnist...both one of the worst campaign slogans ever and "a fabulous campaign slogan"... 2601:206:8302:FCA0:51C2:8748:BB04:BAB5 (talk) 15:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done House Blaster (talk · he/him) 17:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Make America Great Again © Music-Lyrics Copyright 2015[edit]

EDITOR PLEASE READ

The Song 'Make America Great Again' © was copyrighted August 31, 2015 - It was the very FIRST song to use the "Make America Great Again" © title.

Make America Great Again © was professionally recorded by Bobby Palermo, Vietnam Veteran BEFORE Trump was elected. Bobby, an international Singer-Song Writer has recorded over 200 songs in his long career and performed in over 23 countries around the world, and coast-to-coast USA. Bobby has won three awards in Billboard Magazine for his Original Music

Over the many years, Bobby Palermo has performed with such greats as Bob Hope, Tony Orlando, Dianna Ross, Little Richard, Frankie Valli, Fats Domino, Lloyd Price, Dion, Connie Francis, Fabian, Bobby Rydell, etc., etc.

[3]https://Bobby-Palermo.com

Type of Work: Music. Registration Number / Date: PAu003781770 / 2015-08-31. Application Title: Make America Great Again ©. Title: Make America Great Again ©. Copyright Claimant: Bobby Joseph Palermo. Date of Creation: 2015. Authorship on Application: Bobby Joseph Palermo. Authorship: Music and Lyrics.

Steve K7 (talk) 22:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You could go ahead and add this if you tone down the drama and just put like 1 sentence about it. Stick to the facts. LesbianTiamat (talk) 18:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Palermo, FIRST Professional Singer to record "Make America Great Again" © Rally Song - 2015 Copyright Steve K7 (talk) 03:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read the Wikipedia Simplified Manual of Style and then add the information to the article. LesbianTiamat (talk) 03:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Palermo, professional singer, first to record "Make America Great Again" © rally song Steve K7 (talk) 03:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In music

Singer Bobby Palermo produced first single "Make America Great Again" © in 2015 before Trump was elected. Steve K7 (talk) 14:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When was America great?[edit]

Eric Holder and others ask "When was it that America was great?", which is easily shot down by pointing out the bad things at any point in the past (slavery, jim crow, etc). But writers such as Fareed Zakaria have pointed out that MAGA does not really refer to any specific point in the past. Rather, MAGA is a reaction to the fast pace of change in general (ethnic, political, technological), and the alienation and resentment that many feel about this fast pace of change. As this article develops, I think it would be quite astute to incorporate this viewpoint of Zakaria and others into the article. --Westwind273 (talk) 16:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]