Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 November 12

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< November 11
November 13 >

November 12[edit]

Template:WikiProject Alaska topicon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A state top icon template which is used by one user. Can be replaced with Template:WikiProject country member top icon either with the default non-moving flag, or with the |image= parameter if the more annoying moving one is wanted. Gonnym (talk) 23:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How would this work for the default Alaskan flag? Would just adding country=Alaska work? AlaskaGal~ ^_^ 23:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, exactly: {{WikiProject country member top icon|country=Alaska}}. Gonnym (talk) 23:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, but we should name the generic template something else since Alaska is not a country. Frietjes (talk) 23:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Connecticut topicon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused WikiProject country and state top icon templates which were replaced with Template:WikiProject country member top icon. Gonnym (talk) 23:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment dunno about the others, but the US top icon links to almost 500 pages, so perhaps that one should be kept? I see there is now a generic template for countries, but what neccessitates the need to delete {{WikiProject United States topicon}}...? - wolf 02:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The link usage is pretty much "fake" and comes from Template:Top icon templates. Once that is removed, you'll see it basically has none. Gonnym (talk) 15:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Didn't... really... answer the question - wolf 09:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, but we should name the generic template something else since Connecticut and Kansas are not countries. Frietjes (talk) 23:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Year in[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 21:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated in its use by Template:Yearsincomics. There might be value to a generic template with a title like this, but this ain't it. Izno (talk) 22:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I was comparing Template:Yearsincomics and Template:Years in film and thinking about a generic template. I think the only issue might be the many ifexists checks that would possibly be needed to reduce red links. Gonnym (talk) 22:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Administrative structure of Gujarat[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 November 19. ✗plicit 23:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Attached KML/Canadian Indian residential school gravesites[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above are all unused KML templates for miscellaneous areas. Since these are non-road, paths or lines maps, I don't feel comfortable adding these. If anyone wants to add one, feel free and let me know and I'll strike the template from the list. Gonnym (talk) 15:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and close as malformed - Unused is not a rationale for deletion, these aren't non-free photos. This is background data and not a template, why are you nominating subpages of an active template for deletion? 76.67.45.120 (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    You can disagree with my nomination, but in no way is it malformed, nor is your assertion that Unused is not a rationale for deletion. It clearly is as the community has deleted numerous amounts of unused templates. Also, these are templates, and it is irrelevant if they are background data or some other kind. If they aren't used, they serve no function. Gonnym (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    That's simply not true, this serves as the KML foundation that generates the geoJSON data used by the map in the article in the case of the residential school gravesites. 76.67.45.120 (talk) 20:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    You are incorrect. If it was used, it would have been shown as a transclusion. Also, what map are you referring to? I don't see a map in that article. Ok, now I see. User:Floydian (which I'm assuming is you), added it here and it was removed right after. If you look at the code you added, the map data is taken from Commons:Data:Canadian Indian residential school gravesites.map which is not even here but from WP:Commons. --Gonnym (talk) 23:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Attached KML/Grand Army Plaza[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above are all unused KML templates for parks. Since these are non-road, paths or lines maps, I don't feel comfortable adding these. If anyone wants to add one, feel free and let me know and I'll strike the template from the list. Gonnym (talk) 15:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. None of these attached KML files are used on the articles themselves. Additionally, to my knowledge, all three already have interactive maps or pushpin maps, in addition to coordinates. As such, the KML files may be unnecessary. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Attached KML/Elgin Bypass[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is unused after it was removed from the article. Gonnym (talk) 15:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Attached KML/Barrackpore Trunk Road[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template is unused as Barrackpore Trunk Road uses Wikipedia:Map data/Wikipedia KML/Barrackpore Trunk Road. Gonnym (talk) 15:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Attached KML/Balykchy Kochkor Kara-Keche Railroad[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template as there isn't an article for Balykchy Kochkor Kara-Keche Railroad. Gonnym (talk) 15:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Stagecraft ToDo contents[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unlinked to do template which hasn't been updated in over a decade. Gonnym (talk) 11:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Liberal Christianity[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This sidebar template created 2 months ago is still unused. It should either be added or deleted. From checking a few pages it links to, those already have more than one sidebar so not sure how helpful adding even more clutter to the main reading area is. Gonnym (talk) 11:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete There is no main subject of Liberal Christianity and all links are general Christianity topics already linked on other sidebars. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Letran Knights Senior Basketball Champions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This meta navbox is unused and should also never be used. If any of the specific year navboxes should be used, then the relevant template should be used on those pages (though by looking at them, a lot of them seem to be full of non-links so no sure how helpful even they are). Gonnym (talk) 11:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:List of plant genus names with etymologies TOC[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused ToC template. Gonnym (talk) 10:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dayna Manning[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't actually navigate much of anything. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:List of minor planets/footer[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, and to make way for moving Template:MinorPlanetListFooter, to match the Template:List of minor planets/See also & Template:List of minor planets/header2 naming conventions.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  04:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's not unused. There are still 11 pages linked to it. I presume the links will be replaced by another reference? Please clarify the planned changes. Urhixidur (talk) 13:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Urhixidur: there are only 2 transclusions (both irrelevant), and all links to it are also irrelevant:
  1. User:Wcquidditch/wikideletiontoday — irrelevant (placed due to the current discussion)
  2. User:Pppery/noinclude list (transclusion) — irrelevant (placed due to the current discussion)
  3. User talk:Urhixidur — irrelevant (placed due to the current discussion)
  4. Wikipedia:Templates for discussion — irrelevant (placed due to the current discussion)
  5. Wikipedia:XfD today — irrelevant (placed due to the current discussion)
  6. Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot (4th request) — a 15 year old expired bot request
  7. Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Template redirects — to be removed after successful TfD
  8. Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/All current discussions — irrelevant (placed due to the current discussion)
  9. Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 November 12 — irrelevant (placed due to the current discussion)
  10. Wikipedia talk:Cascade-protected items/Archive 1 — a 10 year old archived discussion
  11. Template:TOC001/testcases (transclusion) — removed; unnecessary
~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  14:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, or history merge if that is more appropriate. I am not seeing the links that Urhixidur refers to. The current links are either due to this listing or links from discussions that will not be affected by this change. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Not actively used. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_12&oldid=1186089868"