Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 January 16

< January 15	January 17 >

January 16[edit]

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Template/Signpost-block-start[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Template/Signpost-block-start}}

Template redirect that is not in use anywhere. No incoming links except for Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Omni-index and Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Omni-index/Linkshere, two pages populated by scripts I wrote to catalog Signpost pages that have no incoming links. One of my major projects as editor-in-chief is to harmonize the use of templates and pages, as the existence of numerous redundant templates (deprecated, never used, or created at the wrong title by typos) poses a large obstacle to navigating or editing Signpost templates. For example, old Signpost articles (from 2005 to 2009) were never properly indexed by the module, because they used strange idiosyncratic header templates, which I recently fixed, allowing me to write a script which updated the module with their titles, authors and tags. Someone has requested that I list these at XFD pages individually rather than nominate them for speedy deletion. jp×g 23:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The rational, especially given by the editor-in-chief of the project, is very strong. I agree that having unused templates makes maintenance always harder. Gonnym (talk) 15:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Template/Signpost-block-end[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Template/Signpost-block-end}}

Template redirect that is not in use anywhere. No incoming links except for Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Omni-index and Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Omni-index/Linkshere, two pages populated by scripts I wrote to catalog Signpost pages that have no incoming links. One of my major projects as editor-in-chief is to harmonize the use of templates and pages, as the existence of numerous redundant templates (deprecated, never used, or created at the wrong title by typos) poses a large obstacle to navigating or editing Signpost templates. For example, old Signpost articles (from 2005 to 2009) were never properly indexed by the module, because they used strange idiosyncratic header templates, which I recently fixed, allowing me to write a script which updated the module with their titles, authors and tags. Someone has requested that I list these at XFD pages individually rather than nominate them for speedy deletion. jp×g 23:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The rational, especially given by the editor-in-chief of the project, is very strong. I agree that having unused templates makes maintenance always harder. Gonnym (talk) 15:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:YYYY in women's baseball category header[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:YYYY in women's baseball category header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer used after the category mergers of years into decades of the women's baseball categories on December 28 and has been replaced by Template:YYY0s in women's baseball category header. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Olympique de Médéa squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Olympique de Médéa squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template isn't even used! There isn't even a squad list at Olympique de Médéa Govvy (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Giant Snowman 20:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not used, but no prejudice to restoring if/when a current squad list if populated. Giant Snowman 20:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Population Genetics Glossary[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Population Genetics Glossary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 17:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timrå IK roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Timrå IK roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

merged with Timrå IK Frietjes (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Malmö Redhawks roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Malmö Redhawks roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

merged with Malmö Redhawks Frietjes (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Färjestad BK roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Färjestad BK roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

merged with Färjestad BK Frietjes (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FK Daugava Daugavpils squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FK Daugava Daugavpils squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per User:Snowflake91's comment on 8 January 2023, this club was dissolved in 2015. It, therefore, has no 'current squad'. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

delete defunct club does not have a current squad. Pelmeen10 (talk) 21:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Giant Snowman 21:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not needed. Giant Snowman 21:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:John Cain Sr sidebar[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 January 24. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:John_Cain_Sr_sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vrl[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vrl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Simple link template only used on 3 articles with no documentation. This serves to make articles harder to read for little benefit. Subst and delete. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I apparently created this template and have no objection to the above proposal. W. P. Uzer (talk) 08:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:I trust[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:I trust (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template serves no useful purpose now that Wikipedia:Trust network is marked as historical. Subst and delete. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba ordinal category[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba ordinal category (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{navseasoncats}}. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BSicon-CPIC[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BSicon-CPIC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Should have been removed when the BSicon catalogs were moved to Commons, but somehow got overlooked. Useddenim (talk) 14:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alignd[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alignd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one archived talk page discussion. Created in 2016. Subst and delete. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:StEpLink[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:14, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:StEpLink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough complexity to warrant a template. Only 5 uses. Subst and delete. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Synchronizedswimming2012Olympics[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Synchronizedswimming2012Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Purely static (no edits since 2014 other than uncategorized template patrol) article content used on only 2 articles. Subst and delete. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Star Trek episode count[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Star Trek episode count (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Now redundant to {{Television franchise episode count}}. -- Alex_21_TALK 01:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Walking Dead episode count[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Walking Dead episode count (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Now redundant to {{Television franchise episode count}}. -- Alex_21_TALK 01:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arrowverse episode count[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arrowverse episode count (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Now redundant to {{Television franchise episode count}}. -- Alex_21_TALK 01:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).