Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 October 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 23 October 25 >

October 24[edit]

Template:Bilibili[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing of value as it links to Bilibili's website. Not even used and unlikely to be. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Atlético CP squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The first navbox has only three links. Not enough for one. The second templates has no information, but won't be enough from the mainspace article, only three player's articles exist. Still wouldn't be enough. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Naval 1º de Maio Squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:50, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Squad templates are navboxes, and when there are no articles to navigate between, the template should be deleted. Geschichte (talk) 21:21, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017 Asian Winter Games China men's ice hockey team roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These are not templates, but rather a roster list that is purely article content. 23 of the 24 count as single-use and should be substituted on the respective nation's article for their participation at the 2017 Asian Winter Games. The Kazakhstan men's ice hockey team roster is the only one that is unused and should be substituted on the respective Kazakhstan article with a section for the men's squad. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lithuanian Archery Championships[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All articles that this navbox points to have been deleted or never existed. Geschichte (talk) 18:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PAW Patrol[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:53, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Small number of articles in this, limited chances of expansions. Also created by blocked user in violation of ban. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Almost all of the links in this navbox are pointed to already in almost all of the pages linked. That is, navbox provides no extra navigation usefulness. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 03:04, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019AfricanGamesHandballSchedule[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The 2019 and 2011 Handball templates are unused as the respective articles already contain the information in table format. The two 2015 templates are single-use and should be substituted on the respective 2015 African Games basketball and volleyball articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015AfricanGamesHandballSchedule[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is only use on one page, and the template has been replaced. Therefore, this template should be deleted. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 13:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Inconsistent citations[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. If someone wants to recreate the page as a redirect somewhere, there is no prejudice; consensus here is to delete but there is no consensus to redirect. Primefac (talk) 08:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and There is no consensus on use of this template today. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This used to be a useful template, but that use no longer exists. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 17:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If we don't need it and it's not useful, delete it. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 01:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:47, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Template:Citation style, I think this would make a reasonable redirect. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 08:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't understand your reasoning. Why should we redirect something that is unused and unneeded? Can't we (shouldn't we) just delete it? — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 10:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @JohnFromPinckney: I'm proposing a redirect because I think it's a reasonable search term for people looking for the clean-up template for tagging inconsistent or messy citations and might be useful in that form. I have no objection to deleting the old template then creating a redirect in it's place, but I this is the kind of thing I'd search for when looking for Template:Citation style. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 16:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Should this template be redirected or simply deleted?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Multiple transclusion[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Metatemplate that is unused despite creation in 2012. Its disadvantages are that it adds to maintenance burden and more importantly, I think at least, makes it harder for editors to access the actual formatting of an article. I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PartofWPCOLOMBIA[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate to {{WikiProject South America|Colombia=yes}} with wikiproject page specified in page type. I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Glyptemys[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and duplicate to Template:Emydidae Tom (LT) (talk) 07:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GearWiki[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I think this attribution template to a wiki should be deleted. It's unused, and having it legitimises the copying of content from other WPs, which at least on our scale of reliability are not considered reliable sources. Particularly since this remains unused despite creation 9 years ago, I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tz rename comment[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and created and last edited in 2012, this extremely specific template should just be replaced by a plain text explanation of the problem. There is certainly no reason for this template to keep existing. I propose deletion Tom (LT) (talk) 07:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and as creator. Never used, apparently. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 18:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CNSV Incubator[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created in 2012. Unused and seems to duplicate the purpose of drafts? I'm not sure if this template should be kept for historical reasons or maybe more appropriately just deleted as it doesn't seem to have been used at all anyway. I (philosophically) err on the side of deletion in this situation. Thoughts? Tom (LT) (talk) 07:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Watch-Wiki[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used and what's more, a Wiki should not be used anyway for the purpose of sourcing our content. Created in 2012 and probably unlikely to be used in the future, I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Notthe[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be purposeless and unused. Unclear title doesn't help. Created and last edited in 2012. I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Looks like it might have been a would-be hatnote variant, or something. Certainly not useful now. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 02:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Union Jack[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Way too specific and detailed to be used, this unfortunately probably falls in the too detailed category of our encyclopedia and therefore under WP:NOTRESPOSITORY. Unused and last edited in 2011. I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:38, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Swan Lake[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Way too specific and detailed to be used, this unfortunately probably falls in the too detailed category of our encyclopedia and therefore under WP:NOTRESPOSITORY. Unused and last edited in 2011. I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:38, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spanish conquest of the Americas[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and duplicate to the more expansive and comprehensive Template:Spanish colonization of the Americas. I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hakone entry[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not necessary. Template is overly specific, unlikely to be used, contributes to maintenance burden and should be deleted. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hakone Entry Composed[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not necessary. Template is overly specific, unlikely to be used, contributes to maintenance burden and should be deleted. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tennis topic[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see this template being actively or historically used in the context of e.g. a WP. I propose deletion as this template is unused and purposeless. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite AQA EPQ Performance Tables[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unused template that simplify stores a link. Should be simply deleted. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adoptee activity concern[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTBURO. Not used since 2010, this template is kind of confrontational to read and is probably best deleted and (if every needed) replaced with a thoughtful individualised message Tom (LT) (talk) 07:21, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ia-cast[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This rather specific image template is unused, probably because it's overly specific, and redundant to the overall template Template:Cleanup image. I doubt therefore it's being monitored even. I think it's simpler and cleaner and more efficient to delete the template and therefore propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 01:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Australian Constitutional Law[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:32, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used on any article except linked within the Australian Constitution template. Template currently lists four Australian Supreme Court cases which won't do well for navigation if it all did was link every court case that the court decided on. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Armenian companies established in the year[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and we don't use templates for country-speific companies established by what year. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1973/Position/Commissioner, District Eight[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:17, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These unusued templates relate to information that is probably not even encyclopedic. I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete All three are already featured on the Luc Larivée article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I had no idea these were still around. By all means, delete. CJCurrie (talk) 02:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BearDown[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Speedy delete as CSD G2 Test edit Liz Read! Talk! 04:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not a template. Probably was a test edit as the user who created this had the same text creating their sandbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FULLROOTPAGENAMEE[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This unused template displays a magic word but in a different format. It's unused and I suspect not known about and I think poses a risk to editors who make a typo and get a result that they are not expecting a different result. I therefore propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Maryland/flag/animated[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template, last edited 2008, that duplicates an image. I propose deletion. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_October_24&oldid=1057190678"