Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 2 December 4 >

December 3[edit]

Template:Element[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For most usage (anything except antimatter, judging by the documentation) this template is redundant to {{chem2}}, as with the other single-element templates discussed previously. Anti-matter cannot be written with the normal chemistry templates. Instead the template that Template:Element wraps can be used ({{Physics particle|He|TR=+|anti=yes}} →
He+
) which is equally straightforward. Fairly low usage. User:GKFXtalk 23:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Generic {{Chem2}} coverage available; similar function to dedicated element templates TfD'ed {{Hydrogen}}. The antimatter option (overline) is available in the {{ComplexNuclide}} family (using meta {{Physics particle}} nom mentions). -DePiep (talk) 08:05, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Czech Republic winners in the Big Four pageants[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN. Just two winners. The Banner talk 18:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Israel winners in the Big Four pageants[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN, just two links to winners The Banner talk 18:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prevrefs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, of course, since it was meant as a temporary-use template while previewing. No incoming links from discussion pages. This template was created back when references did not show at all when previewing a section. MediaWiki has been changed to show refs when previewing a section, so this template is no longer useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prefix if[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to have been created as an experiment in 2018, but unless it has been substed, it has had no use. Delete, or if it is used, change to subst only by adding {{subst only}} to its documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I don't recall why I made that template. It probably had something to do with the work I was doing on {{Ship}} at that time, but in any case it's obviously not needed any more. --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE    ) 20:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gu browse, Template:Vi browse, and Template:Pr browse[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 23:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2014; no substantive edits since that time. If I had to guess, I would guess that there are no official US Highways in Puerto Rico, only Category:Highways in Puerto Rico that have other designations, so it is not possible to use this template. The same rationale and potential explanation applies to {{Gu browse}} (Guam) and {{Vi browse}} (US Virgin Islands?). If they can be used, please put them into use and I will happily withdraw this nomination. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gu browse should have been in use, and I just put it in use, so please withdraw it from this nomination. These browsers have nothing to do with the US Highway System per se; they're to add a second browser to the bottom of an infobox as necessary. Imzadi 1979 → 17:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Vi browse should have also been in use, and it is now. Please withdraw it as well. Imzadi 1979 → 18:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And finally Pr browse should also have been in use and is now. As such, all three of these are in use. These are not isolated test cases, so the transclusion count should continue to increase. Please withdraw the nomination of all three now. Imzadi 1979 → 18:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Request withdrawn by nominator. Thanks for your attention, Imzadi1979. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portal-Kopf3[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. Appears to have been copied from German WP in 2017 for use in translation of portal pages, but unless it has been substed, it has had no use. Delete, or if it is used, change to subst only by adding {{subst only}} to its documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Plph2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to have been used as a subtemplate of Template:IPA-pl at one time (as of 2009), but subsequent development of that template appears to have orphaned this one. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:People Power LegCo members[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions of this navbox. Only one link in this navbox. See similar nomination that closed as Delete. Linking of possibly relevant articles is well covered by Category:People Power (Hong Kong) politicians, which has only 11 members. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Penstrokesbox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. No substantive edits since creation in 2008. May be redundant to {{Fhps}} or another template in Category:Field hockey templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Googleappspotblock[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; no transclusions, substitutions, or incoming links. No substantive edits since 2013. Appears to be a template that was created in anticipation of use, but was never used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Localities in Stockholm Municipality[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only 1 link, which is already in the article. Superfluous. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pas de onze 5W6M[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused. Guys, it looks like we should delete it. Q28 (talk) 07:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject United States/old[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this template is no longer used. Q28 (talk) 07:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment a genericized version of this should be transwikied to Templates.wikia, or used as basis of an article at Wikiversity on template coding -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 19:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Page history exists for a reason. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox settlement/old[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but it's really not used. Q28 (talk) 07:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Transwiki to Templates.wikia and whatever open source code repositories exist for MediaWiki template coding -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 19:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete finally! We are past this now. -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Page history exists for a reason. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, this was useful for debugging when the template was changed to use {{infobox}}, but the debugging is done, so this can be deleted. Frietjes (talk) 17:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dabprefixesnum[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used and very rough. Q28 (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Update after/core[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template is corrupted and unused. Q28 (talk) 07:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ConvertAbbrev/404[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not used and no longer in use. Q28 (talk) 07:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Spirits/hide[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, this is an unused template. Q28 (talk) 06:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Popular Culture/hide[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, this is an unused template. Q28 (talk) 06:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Gastropods/hide[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, this is an unused template. Q28 (talk) 06:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WPBannerMeta/core/styles.css[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Obviously, we might want to delete it. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete since there's a copy in Common.css currently. --Izno (talk) 13:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Location map+/old/width[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is not being used, so we need to delete it. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Location map/old/decdeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is not used, and the template document does not say that the template needs to be preserved. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Listref/ListrefErrors.js[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. The page appears to be in use, it has been fully-protected and had its content model corrected. Speedy keep reason 3: nomination entirely inaccurate, although some work was needed. (non-admin closure) User:GKFXtalk 10:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused pages, and It is completely corrupted. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete or move to userspace if wanted. Javascript should not be stored in the template namespace, because using JS from that namespace as a user script is insecure, because anyone can edit it. User:GKFXtalk 08:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: It is untrue that this page is unused. It is loaded in User:Farang Rak Tham/common.js and at least two other user js files. I have no objection to it being moved to user space. If a redirect is not left, the users' .js files will need to be fixed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and fully protect This is neither functionally unused nor in any way completely corrupted, and that latter claim merely indicates that the nominator is on the wrong side of Chesterton's fence. This does need to be fully protected (which is a better solution that the ugly hack of moving to userspace) to remedy GFKX's concern, but after changing the content model to JavaScript, there will be no valid reason for deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fine by me, I took Q28's word that it was unused and was rather concerned to see an unprotected user script in the template namespace! I have changed the content model to JS and commented out the TfD tag. User:GKFXtalk 23:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_3&oldid=1060030643"