Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 June 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< June 18 June 20 >

June 19[edit]

Template:UsernamePolicy[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 16:00, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used in only two pages, Wikipedia:Username policy, where it is a summary box, and Wikipedia:Request an account, where it is essentially a snapshot of the username policy. I'm proposing to substitute it into Wikipedia:Username policy and then transclude it into Wikipedia:Request an account using a Help:Labeled section transclusion. The template is not so big as to be disruptive to substitute into the policy, the policy is where it is most likely to be edited, and this will remove an unneeded extra layer for users wishing to edit it. Bsherr (talk) 01:39, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep it seems like an over-complicated solution to a problem that doesn't exist; new users probably shouldn't edit it anyway, regular users will find no problem. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 11:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, it's the use of the template that is the overcomplicated solution. A labeled section transclusion is much simpler, making it easier to edit, has the benefit of consolidating talk pages by design, and is technically more efficient too. --Bsherr (talk) 15:54, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I disagree: a template (familiar to most) is simpler than labeled section transclusion (known to only a select few). --Jules (Mrjulesd) 16:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It's in use, and not hurting anything. If you're concerned that it's difficult to edit, go stick {{VTE}} in the header instead. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I was trying to avoid the need to do that entirely, since it only appears on two pages. --Bsherr (talk) 15:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert (talk) 12:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • LSTify per nom; this has no good reason to be in a template * Pppery * it has begun... 17:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • LSTify per nom Hillelfrei talk 20:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per ACN and Mrjulesd. I've added a {{vte}} in the footer (someone smarter than I may be able to figure out how to get it into the header...). --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep with {{vte}}, addressing the nominator's concern without replacing a purposefully used MediaWiki core feature by extension-specific intricate syntax. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Renaissance music manuscript English sources[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:English Virginalist School. Primefac (talk) 01:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Renaissance music manuscript English sources with Template:English Virginalist School.
The virginal books are such an important part of the English Virginal school that I had already put them in the "English Virginalist School" template. It seems pointless to have the exact same information in the "Renaissance music manuscript English sources" one as well. Aza24 (talk) 22:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert (talk) 15:22, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As regards "Parthenia", although currently listed among the manuscripts, this collection is not a manuscript, and is significant as a printed book. For that reason, I would support merging the manuscripts template with a template which would not exclude printed keyboard music. The English Virginalist School template proposed seems OK to me.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Las Vegas High Schools[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 10:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently unused, duplicated by Template:High Schools in Las Vegas TheImaCow (talk) 09:04, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latvian Encyclopedia[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 10:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently unused, no meaningful content TheImaCow (talk) 09:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lebanese Women's Football League seasons[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by GB fan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already in Template:Lebanese Women's Football League included TheImaCow (talk) 08:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete (as the template's creator) per nom. Nehme1499 (talk) 10:14, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Biography2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Soft delete WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 10:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Importing templates and their dependencies from other wikis when local templates for the same purpose already exist is a bad idea * Pppery * it has begun... 04:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_19&oldid=965213303"