User talk:Werldwayd/Archive28
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, I see your recently changes at the article Habibi I Love You, you've finally done as I left a message at edit summary in my last revision, I bet you got my message there first then did. Thanks. That Music Video section was added by me and is the second Soundtrack article after Drift & Die, for the thing I did same at Habibi I love you by adding Music video section. Thanks for updating that Habibi's article. CK (talk) 05:53, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Grennan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seaside (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Playbill-specimen-cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Playbill-specimen-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to The Voice Nigeria does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! North America1000 14:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Britton Buchanan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Britton Buchanan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britton Buchanan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 02:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Tinsley House
Hi Werldwayd. Great start on Tinsley House. I've started a discussion on the talk page, suggesting a possible page move: I'd value your input. All the best, ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:50, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am all for consistency between titles. I support such a move. werldwayd (talk) 13:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Famousbirthdays.com as a source
Hi Werldwayd . I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for biographical information in Now United Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. (Also, that article could use a lot more work if you have the time.) --Ronz (talk) 03:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Blame-it-on-you-single-by-youngblood.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Blame-it-on-you-single-by-youngblood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salameh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Sean-cody-logo.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sean-cody-logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Amaia y Alfred has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CHMP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charged multivesicular body protein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Sakr (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sakr (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Sakr (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Leschnei (talk) 20:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
The Eastern Door
Do you know of any significant independent coverage of The Eastern Door? You may answer here. --Bejnar (talk) 18:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I Have now added stories from Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and from Ryerson Review of Journalism in addition to an item showing the weekly won the best Quebec community paper in General Excellence category in 2017 I have also added categories as requested by reviewing colleagues. werldwayd (talk) 23:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I came across this article when editing Layla Anna-Lee, who is married to a different Richard Cullen. I was able to establish that they are different, and to add an additional reference on Cullen's private life, but have totally failed to find references in reliable sources for anything else in the article, including the awards nominations that led you to remove the notability tag back in 2010. As a result, the article fails verification so far as I'm concerned and I'm not sure he's notable. Can you dredge up any sources on his career? Otherwise, I think the article should be redirected to Darren Hayes and the lawyer given the non-disambiguated title, but it's entirely possible I am not looking in the right places or plugging in the right search terms to get past Google's eagerness to show me recent results. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:42, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- I have given some thought to your comments and which one is the more notable. Since I don't have a firm opinion on which of the two (or three) being prominent, the safest way is to make Richard Cullen the disambiguation page referring to the attorney, the artist married to Darren Hayes. I also included the person married to Layla Anna-Lee but this was removed later. This new arrangement is better leaving the visitor decide on which Cullen he is searching. As for the matter of the rewards unverifiable, I will look further into this. 16:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I agree, nothing seems to be out there on which to write about Anna-Lee's husband. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Unpractice-Makes-Perfect.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Unpractice-Makes-Perfect.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
Disambiguation link notification for June 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Singer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kay One (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Hot 100 Airplay
Hi Werldwayd. I've reverted your change to Hot 100 Airplay. It's not so much that I object to the idea but we need to do a bit of cleanup first. There are currently over 400 pages that link to the redirect so before we turn it into a disambiguation page, we should fix these links so that they directly target Hot 100 Airplay (Radio Songs). Otherwise, we're just creating a mess. A temporary solution if we want to help readers find what they want and add to Hot 100 Airplay (Radio Songs) a hatnote saying something like: for the Brazilian chart see Brasil Hot 100 Airplay. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, your approach is ideal, as so many songs refer to the US Airplay chart anyway, and just a handful to the Brazilian and Romanian ones. I'd keep it the way you amended it. Thanks werldwayd (talk) 04:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Qnews-australia.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Qnews-australia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Keep-it-simple-mohamed-ali.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Keep-it-simple-mohamed-ali.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Max Ryder for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Max Ryder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Ryder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Project-gogo-boy-poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Project-gogo-boy-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Aznavour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Aznavour Square (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Meaning-of-matthew-book-cover.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Meaning-of-matthew-book-cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Note on adding unsourced content
Hey, I'm Z0. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.
Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.
Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The editor whose username is Z0 19:24, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
R.wan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, R.wan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. The editor whose username is Z0 19:24, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- I have added a great number of reliable sources before relaunching the page in main Wikipedia as R.wan. Thanks for the review and suggestions. werldwayd (talk) 20:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
The romanization of Thai names
If you have time, I would appreciate your thoughts on this. Khiikiat (talk) 11:40, 15 July 2018 (UTC).
- I have started a general discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Proper_names#Names_in_other_scripts
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 19:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jagdgeschwader, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jagdgeschwader 1 and Jagdgeschwader 71 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Names-mimeh-by-omer-adam.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Names-mimeh-by-omer-adam.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Arabesque-chris-ward.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Arabesque-chris-ward.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:T-NewYorkTimesStyle-Magazine-Spring-2010.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:T-NewYorkTimesStyle-Magazine-Spring-2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:53, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Youthful Offender Program moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Youthful Offender Program, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published (you even added an unreferenced template). It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Design Canada
Hello Werldwayd,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Design Canada for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:54, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- It clearly states on the Speedy deletion notice "do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself", so you should have appealed on the talk page and not removed the notice. However, your edits have got rid of the concerning text and I will not replace it. Instead I am going to ask for a "rev del" which will remove access to past versions of the article, visible through the history tab. I am also going to nominate it for "Articles for deletion" because I do not believe it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. That discussion will remain open for a week and you can express your views there. Do not remove either of these notices from the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Design Canada
Hello, Werldwayd,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Design Canada should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design Canada .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Cuando calienta el sol (song)
Hi, I'm Domdeparis. Werldwayd, thanks for creating Cuando calienta el sol (song)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. you need to work on the referencing as is the subject does not meet WP:NSONG
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Dom from Paris (talk) 16:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
KBM
There should be no links to disambiguation pages, so now that you made KBM a dab page, would you please follow up and fix all the incoming links? (Dabsolver is helpful.) Thanks. — Gorthian (talk) 04:33, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Recent move of Nataša Jovanović (Progressive Party politician) page
Hello. Could you please respond to my comments at Talk:Nataša Jovanović (politician)? Thank you. CJCurrie (talk) 03:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
Disambiguation link notification for August 4
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Lewi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Qaghan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Tolis Qaghan
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Diama (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Diama (disambiguation), Werldwayd!
Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I removed one entry as a partial title match, see WP:PTM and MOS:DAB for more on what should and shouldn't be included in disambiguation pages.
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
--Animalparty! (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Moshe Hogeg
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Moshe Hogeg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. John from Idegon (talk) 01:54, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Celeste (name)
Hi Werldwayd, Celeste (name) and moved the given names and surnames from Celeste (disambiguation) to create Celeste (name). Belatedly I noticed that you had added a large proportion (all?) of those names and it would have been polite of me to ask your opinion about the change ahead of time. I apologize for charging ahead and if you have any issues with what I did, please don't hesitate to let me know. Leschnei (talk) 12:38, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- I think the new set-up is ideal for our purposes. In fact I am glad you took the initiative. Many thanks. werldwayd (talk) 13:14, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Farhan (name)
Hi. I've reviewed Farhan (name). I've gone ahead and requested a page move to Farhan since disambiguation in the title is not necessary. Bennv3771 (talk) 14:27, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Qx-magazine-uk.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Qx-magazine-uk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (We Believe (Newsboys song)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating We Believe (Newsboys song), Werldwayd!
Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your new article on "We Believe" by the Newsboys. The notice that someone has placed at the top of the article still applies, as there is reason to question whether the song is independently notable as compared to the album that it came from. Good luck.
To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (American Renaissance (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating American Renaissance (disambiguation), Werldwayd!
Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
There should only be one blue link per entry (see MOS:DABENTRY).
To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Bennv3771 (talk) 09:30, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
The article The Ode has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:42, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of The Ode for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Ode is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ode until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate article?
Hi, you appear to have created the two almost identical articles Joaquin Masmitjà and Joaquim Masmitjà. These are about the same person, aren't they? – Uanfala (talk) 18:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. This merge request was outstanding since December 2017. I have now merged Joaquin Masmitjà into Joaquim Masmitjà and made Joaquin Masmitjà a redirect. werldwayd (talk) 12:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
The article Grab (magazine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NMAG, as tagged since January 2013.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:29, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have now created a small section for the magazine in Grabby Awards as the magazine founded and named the awards. Now the magazine is a redirect page. werldwayd (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Yoweri Museveni
Thanks for your recent edits to Museveni. Wizzy…☎ 06:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Audio Playground for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Audio Playground is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audio Playground until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:51, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
The article Ray Dylan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give In My Mind (Dynoro and Gigi D'Agostino song) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Ss112 17:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
