User talk:Wctrenchard

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wctrenchard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Everedux (talk) 01:34, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warren C. Trenchard moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Warren C. Trenchard, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lee Hyung-geun[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lee Hyung-geun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SunDawn talk 03:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Hyung-geun moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Lee Hyung-geun, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 09:19, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I "Published' it simply to get it saved so I can edit it. I did not know how to save it to "draft." I will work on in it in that space. This is very helpful.Wctrenchard (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, Wctrenchard, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username.

If you choose to keep your current username, please send an email to info-enwikimedia.org including your real name and your Wikipedia username to receive instructions from our volunteer response team about account verification. Please do not send documentation without being requested to do so.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Your requested new username cannot already be in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice. Orange Mike | Talk 19:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Verified ticket:2021100610001278, unblocked, courtesy ping to Orangemike - Cabayi (talk) 17:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warren C. Trenchard (September 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Justlettersandnumbers were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There's nothing here to suggest that this person is notable by our standards. According to Google Scholar he has an h-index of about 2; on Scopus he isn't listed at all. The page contains swathes of unsourced content, and content that is not supported by the source cited. I haven't checked all of the sources, but I don't see any that cover his life and achievements in depth and in detail – they all appear to be passing mentions at best. If there are any such sources please point them out.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warren C. Trenchard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Warren C. Trenchard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:05, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wctrenchard! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:05, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Warren C. Trenchard has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission,: The measure of his notability is the importance of his books, and substantial reviews in third-party published independent reliable sources arewhatis needed Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 19:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Warren C. Trenchard. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 17:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warren C. Trenchard (October 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please also see WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warren C. Trenchard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Warren C. Trenchard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:General Lee - 4 star.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:General Lee - 4 star.JPG. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jonteemil (talk) 22:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the summary regarding this photo on the media file as follows: This is a personal, family photo from 1956 that was provided to me by the family. It is a copy of the original 8x10 photo. It also appears in a 1993 autobiography by the subject, a copy of which I have. Wctrenchard (talk) 20:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why has this image not been restored?!?! Wctrenchard (talk) 04:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Johnsson-share.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Johnsson-share.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The photo in question - Johnsson-share.jpg - is a personal photo from the subject. How do I get this approved? Wctrenchard (talk) 20:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Wctrenchard! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Photo copyrights, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warren C. Trenchard (May 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Warren C. Trenchard may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 04:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please identify the "copyrighted content." Wctrenchard (talk) 18:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wctrenchard, Gusfriend, I've commented on this at Draft talk:Warren C. Trenchard. Wctrenchard, if content is copied from Wikipedia to another place, you are expected to acknowledge that fact so as to comply with the terms of our CC BY-SA 3.0 Creative Commons licence. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not my day, re-ping Gusfriend. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Hyung-geun (May 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

100% notable, but the sourcing needs some major work. Specifically, per WP:CIRCULAR, Wikipedia cannot be used as a source on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lee Hyung-geun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lee Hyung-geun, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 05:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The problem seems to be my use of Wikipedia as source(s). I have not used Wikipedia (English), only Wikipedia (Korean). Is the latter the issue? If I eliminate the citing of Wiki (Ko), will that solve the issue? Wctrenchard (talk) 17:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The problem seems to be my use of Wikipedia as source(s). I have not used Wikipedia (English), only Wikipedia (Korean). Is the latter the issue? If I eliminate the citing of Wiki (Ko), will that solve the issue? Wctrenchard (talk) 22:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the duplication. My system did not seem to send it the first time. Anyway, I have removed all the Wikipedia (Korean) references and footnotes and resubmitted it. This piece is very well documented -- much more than the Wikipedia (En) articles about Lee's two, 4-star general colleagues, Paik Sun-yup and Chung Il-kwon. Wctrenchard (talk) 22:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than using Korean Wikipedia directly as a reference you can use the references you find there to support the text. This approach means that if there is any misinterpretation or bias in the Korean page it doesn't flow through to English Wikipedia as we are always going back to the source. Gusfriend (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with my simply not using any using any Korean Wikipedia references or citations? I don't really need them. Wctrenchard (talk) 00:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Hyung-geun (June 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Daum/Naver blogs, and Namu wiki cannot be used as sources. WP:SPS applies. There's an issue with the formatting of the sources as people may end up lose track which sources are used, but that I can help to rectify. Deal with the blogs and wiki first, and I will help on the formatting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lee Hyung-geun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lee Hyung-geun, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 18:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for offering to help with formatting. The piece was first rejected by Curbon7 a few days ago. From the comments I determined that the problem was with my citing KO Wikipedia. I removed all such citations and resubmitted it, noting, "This piece is very well documented -- much more than the Wikipedia (En) articles about Lee's two, 4-star general colleagues, Paik Sun-yup and Chung Il-kwon." If required, I can remove the Daum and Namu citations. I was told to look at "Referencing for Beginners" and noted this requirement for citation: "All quotations, any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, and contentious material (whether negative, positive, or neutral) about living persons must include an inline citation to a source that directly supports the material." I comply with these criteria, even if I remove the citations you identified. Please confirm approval if I remove these. I don't want to be on an endless treadmill of review by multiple editors. Thank you. Wctrenchard (talk) 18:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Hyung-geun has been accepted[edit]

Lee Hyung-geun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Haiiya (talk) (contribs) 01:19, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I have serious problems with the article Inspiration of Ellen G. White. I would like to share my reasons with someone and talk about how to get the article deleted. Thank you. Wctrenchard (talk) 01:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first place to do raise this question is probably on the article's talk page Talk:Inspiration of Ellen G. White where you may find some past discussions that address your concerns about the page. While the lead of the article couches the content under the conditional "Most Seventh-day Adventists believe ..." that may be insufficient shielding for parts of the content that others have called apologetic or lacking in NPOV. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eliminate articles on biblical chapters and verses[edit]

I have been reading and editing several articles on parts of the Bible and issues relating to biblical topics. To my utter amazement and frustration I have discovered that not only does Wikipedia appropriately have articles on the books of the Bible and on major issues in biblical studies but also has separate articles on chapters of these books and on individual verses! To say this is complete nonsense and utterly unnecessary is a gross understatement. Wikipedia has no business engaging in this level of granularity. It doesn't even make any sense from an exegesis or interpretation perspective and can actually distort the situation.

Wikipedia has appropriate articles on the National Football League and its individual teams, e.g., the Chicago Bears. However, it does not have articles on the Bears' specific seasons, their individual games, and certainly not on the individual plays during games. Accordingly, Wikipedia should eliminate all articles on chapters and individual verses of biblical books. Wctrenchard (talk) 22:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Warren C. Trenchard[edit]

Hello, Wctrenchard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Warren C. Trenchard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Warren C. Trenchard[edit]

Hello, Wctrenchard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Warren C. Trenchard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:06, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pierce Street Jazz moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Pierce Street Jazz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pierce Street Jazz (June 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TechnoSquirrel69 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for your submission! In addition to the reasons for declining above, please make sure the subject of this article meets the notability guideline, and that the sources are reliable. Books published by La Sierra faculty, for example, are not independent, and should generally be avoided.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pierce Street Jazz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pierce Street Jazz (October 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Guest soloist section is not referenced. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 09:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pierce Street Jazz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 09:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pierce Street Jazz has been accepted[edit]

Pierce Street Jazz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 09:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of Chicago Divinity School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert M. Grant. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]