User talk:WarrenOutsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HI.

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:08, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WarrenOutsky. You have new messages at Talk:Shell Oil Company.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

test[edit]

1 2 3 WarrenO. (talk) 22:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interest rates[edit]

WarrenOutsky, Why do you keep removing any mention of high interest rates as aiding the rise of structured settlements? What evidence do you have that high interest rates had an effect is irrelevant or false? On the history page you give "unsourced information". So what? Wikipedia has lots of unsourced information. There are even *entire* articles with no sourced information. More important is whether or not what appears on Wikipedia is *true*.

I worked for a life insurance company in the early and mid 1980's in charge of pricing structured settlement annuity contracts. I was well aware of the level of interest rates competitors were using, too. I spoke to claim adjusters who were well aware of (1) the appeal of deferred payments vis-as-vis lump sum settlements, and (2) the effect of high interest rates on deferred payments. My adding higher interest rates is solidly based on my personal experience.

98.228.186.88 (talk) 03:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the input, but should discuss on the article's page. That way other editors can weigh in.Warren (talk) 17:21, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 69.62.243.48. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to McDonaldization seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 69.62.243.48 (talk) 23:36, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but what was not neutral? I don't get it. Me agreeing that she was interesting? Warren (talk) 19:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's not Wikipedia's job to characterize people. 69.62.243.48 (talk) 05:17, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty then please don't characterize me. Ha HaWarren (talk) 17:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited McDonaldization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homogenization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waymarking, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Route 66 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pnyx may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • moved to a hill south and west of the Acropolis. This new meeting place came to be called "Pnyx" (from the Greek word meaning "tightly packed together". Three phases can be distinguished: <ref>[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]