User talk:Tedaram
| This is Tedaram's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
June 2009[edit]
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia!! Just to let you know that I've undone your edits to Daniel Sturridge and to Chelsea F.C. because Sturridge hasn't yet signed for Chelsea. Until Chelsea's official website says he's signed, it's all still rumour. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Southampton squad[edit]
I suggest that you look at the Official club website at [1] which is a more reliable authority. Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 14:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Gavin Massey[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Gavin Massey, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gavin Massey. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --WFC-- 09:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Cousin's departure from Hull City[edit]
Hi, thanks for updating the Hull City article for Cousin's departure.
Just two things: 1) The regular editors at the article try to keep the squad list well-sourced; since the primary source, the club's profile page, wasn't updated yet for the departure, we needed another source. I've gone ahead and supplied one. 2) There's an "as-of" date that we also update whenever the squad changes, I've gone and updated that too. Here's the diff capturing my changes; just something to keep in mind if you edit the list again in the future. Cheers, Northumbrian (talk) 14:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
June 2011[edit]
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Barret (talk) 14:12, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, The article Career statistics John Terry was nominated for deletion because of WP:NOTSTATS, I have added some explanations for the page and also added to the Category:Association football in England lists. I have mentioned it in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Career statistics John Terry but no responce from anyone yet. Can you please check the page Career statistics John Terry for me? ZZ47 (talk) 10:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Invite to the African Destubathon[edit]
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Tedaram. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Southampton Academy / Reserves / U23[edit]
Due to recent updates you have have made, please see the discussion hatnote regarding these articles. There should be really only be one article for all sub-departments of each club. This has been agreed to in principle at WP:FOOTY. In the spirit of fairness, ideally the existing Academy article should be the one to stay as it is older, although the U23 article follows the display format better. Hopefully you can see the logic of this and can assist to move all relevant info onto one article and have the other downgraded to a redirect. Please leave any comments etc on the discussion which can be accessed via either article. Thanks.Crowsus (talk) 15:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Having looked back on it, I can see it does make a lot more sense to have it combined. We should try and sort out deleting one of the articles, probably the academy one since the U23 one follows a better format. Would it be better to rename the reserve section to a better name, seeing as the name is outdated with it becoming a under-23 development squad instead? Thanks for your help though Tedaram (talk) 15:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Glad you think so. I could try and do the merging, but to be honest I feel like I might be treading on toes and annoying folk to do so when none of the content is mine, it would probably be better to involve those who have previously edited the articles and would have an ongoing interest in maintaining them. And yeah I certainly think the Reserves terminology should be changed to U23, but would it probably be easier to merge the content itself then rephrase it as appropriate when all there to see? Crowsus (talk) 17:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Tedaram. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Welcome back![edit]
Hi - thanks for your edits to Southampton squad numbers. Hope to see you here more often. Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 08:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)