User talk:Sweetrjejm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NCH Question[edit]

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. To answer your question on the New Contributor's Help page, the blue boxes are called Infoboxes. There are many different infoboxes for different types of articles, but if you are referring to Matthew Lund, I believe the best box would be Template:Infobox football biography or Template:Infobox athlete. Copy the code, put it as the first thing on the page (above all other text, images, etc.) and fill in the fields. If you have further questions, ask on the WP:NCH or on my talk page (click "talk" in my signature.) Liqudlucktalk 22:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sweetrjejm! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 01:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

The article Matthew Lund has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 03:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Point of View[edit]

Hi there. I've noticed a lot of your edits contain your point of view about the subject. Please don't include your opinion, but refer to the opinions of reliable sources. Thanks. GedUK  15:21, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox stats in footballer articles[edit]

When you edited the Glen Johnson article, you may have noticed a notice saying "LEAGUE GAMES ONLY". You entered "21" for his appearances with Liverpool, which seemed odd since Liverpool has only played 20 matches this season. I've reverted your edit, but please be more careful in the future. --Mosmof (talk) 21:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


An editor has nominated 2010-11 Premier League Full Scorers List, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010-11 Premier League Full Scorers List and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. —Half Price 16:48, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kieran Howard for deletion[edit]

The article Kieran Howard is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieran Howard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. EchetusXe 17:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]