User talk:Styyx/Archives/2021

Draft:Roman Staněk

See Draft:Roman Staněk; I didn't include the earliest versions that were deleted by G5, as it seems the most recent version was freshly restarted, but it would of course be possible if it's necessary. Cheers, WilyD 14:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Valorant

Hi styyx. Are you interested in valorant esports? Robingunes (talk) 13:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

@Robingunes: Yeah actually a bit. I mainly look at the CS:GO esport scene but half of the Valorant players are ex-CS:GO players and the game itself is similar too. ~Styyx ^{Talk? ^-^} 14:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Merhaba Styyx

Merhaba profilinizden Türk olduğunuzu ve İstanbulda yaşadığınızı görünce türkçe yazıyorum Deniz UNAY Makalesi ile ilgili olarak desteğiniz için teşekkür ederim 4 aydır bu makale üzerinde çalışmaktayım Olabildiğince çaba gösterdim. Sizin Google da bulduğunuzdan çok fazlası var aslında örneğin kendisinin Türkiye Geneli okullarda verdiği seminerler okullar ilçe milli eğitimler ve kaymakamlıklar taradından sitelerde haber yapıldı. Ayrıca yerel basında bir çok yazısı var Oyun Değil Siber Zorbalık İfadesi TRT VİZYON dergisi kapağına manşet oldu Anadolu Ajansı na hazırladığı makaleler 15 dile çevrildi ve bilim makalelerinden alıntılar yapıldı yani aslında o kadar fazla detay varki ben en olabilecek linkleri ekledim ama diğer editörler Aljazeraa İndependent Türkçe NYTIMES Pakistan İspanyolca yayınlar bilim makalelerindeki alıntılar Milli Eğitim Bakanlığındaki kaynaklar gerçekten hiç birşey beğenmiyorlar bazen birilerinin beğendiğini diğeri beğenmiyor birisi onay veriyor diğeri siliyor gerçekten bir türk olarak sizzen bu konuda yardımınızı istiyorum inanın Deniz UNAY ile ilgili en ufak bir ayrıcalığa gerek yok sadece gerekli şekilde kaynaklara bakılsa wikipedia yı çoktan hakettiğini görürsünüz tekrar yardımınız için teşekkür ediyorum selamlar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer (talk • contribs) 09:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Merhaba @Emremer: öncelikle cevap yazmakta bukadar geciktiğim için özür dilerim. Google’da onlarca kaynak olduğunun farkındayım, fakat bunlar daha çok kişinin kendi dediğini tekrarladığı için güvenilir kaynak olarak görülmez. Ayrıca tartışmadaki kullanıcıların belirttiği gibi, kaynakların Deniz Unay para ödedikten sonra paylaşılmış olma ihtimali var, tabi bundan emin olamayız. Son olarak yazdığınız mesajların sonuna 4 tilde (~~~~) eklerseniz mesajı imzalamış olursunuz. Bazı kullanıcıların eklemeyenleri ciddiye almama hastalığı var. Teşekkürler. ~Styyx ^{Talk? ^-^} 14:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Tournament results

If you don't use the ntsh template, your table won't sort properly. For example, if you have a range of numbers from 1 to 20, on its own the table will sort it as 1, 10, 2, 20, 3, 4, etc. CentreLeftRight ✉ 20:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

@CentreLeftRight: Thanks for notifying! At first I didn't know how that worked but now I do, still learning :D ~Styyx ^{Talk? ^-^} 15:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Contribution

Thank′s for you recent contribution to discussion on the proposed deletion of the article Johny Messo. Unfortunately, that discussion was closed today, in favor of the deletion proposal. Such outcome was quite surprising, since that article was significantly improved in recent days, and there was no clear consensus for deletion: two votes were in favor of keep, one was for complete deletion, and one was optional - for deletion or merger. Such structure of votes would imply at least relisting, but not total deletion. In theory, how would you close that discussion, in terms of immediate deleting or relisting? Sorabino (talk) 01:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Sorabino: I don't have any experience on closing or relisting AfD's yet, but I think the quality of the arguments leaned on delete, but given that there were 2 keep votes and improvements on the article, I don't think that was enough to form a community consensus so I would've relisted it if I was the person supposed to do it. You can ask for a deletion review if you want to. ~Styyx ^{Talk? ^-^} 07:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank′s, I am still hoping that my direct communication with the closer would result in a relisting, that would allow me to make further improvements to the article. Sorabino (talk) 07:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

editing as a racist is shamful

don't edit on the basis of fascists and racists criteria .. maybe you want to misuse wikipedia and block my account.. no matter .. but turks are acting like fascists and racists .. don't forget that free world don't accept it .. Khabat4545 (talk) 19:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Khabat4545 You are the one who vandalized the Hassan Zirak article across multiple projects by changing his birth town from Bukan to Saqqez, so I suggest you watch your words. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 19:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

study the sources .. you will see my edit was right .. not vandlized .. just a little study .. Khabat4545 (talk) 19:39, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Just a little study gives me this reliable source that says the opposite of what you are saying.... ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 19:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Dear friend User:Styyx no need to go far away .. just look at the Hassan Zirak article, there, in the first line of the paragraph "Early life and career" you can see: <<He was born in Harmileh (part of Saqqez County today)Italic text>>,.. it is obviuosly mentioned in the text of this article that zirak was born in Harmileh.Harmileh is a village in Saqqez not boukan.. hasan zirak was born in Saqqez and died in boukan .. it is really easy to understand.. ThanksKhabat4545 (talk) 04:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a reliable source, it also says that it's near Bukan. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 14:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Styyx/Archives:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2400 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Draft: Derin Yaya

Derin Yaya, Türkiye'nin en üst düzel kadın basketbol ligi olan Kadınlar Basketbol Süper Ligi'nde Bellona Kayseri Basketbol forması giyen milli bir basketbolcudur. Kaynaklarla ilgili bir takım güncellemeler gerçekleştirdim. Kaynaklar arasında Türkiye Basketbol Federasyonu sayfası ve FIBA sayfası da bulunmaktadır. Düzeltmem gereken daha fazla nokta varsa hızlıca düzeltip yayına alınmasını sağlamak istiyorum. Teşekkürler iyi günler. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mertkan Üçüncüoğlu (talk • contribs)

Merhaba Mertkan Üçüncüoğlu. WP:SPORTCRIT gereği bahsettiğiniz TBF ve FIBA sayfaları kayda değerliğe etki etmez. Transfer hakkında olan haberler ise "rutin" olarak kabul edilir. Kişi WP:NBASKETBALL'da bulunan kriterleri karşılamadığı için draft sayfasının maddeye taşınmasını reddettim, yani şimdilik İnglizce Wikipedia'da yer almak için kayda değer değil. İyi çalışmalar. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 17:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

WP:SPORTCRIT ve WP:NBASKETBALL olarak bahsettiğiniz kriterler erkek sporculara uyuyor. Kadın sporculara uygun kriterler yok. O neden kriterler karşılanmıyor olabilir. Bunu göz önünde bulundurarak ve aşağıdaki örneklere bakarak tekrar değerlendirmenizi rica edeceğim.

• Tilbe Şenyürek
• Pelin Bilgiç

Mertkan Üçüncüoğlu (talk) 19:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Kriterlerde cinsiyet ayrımı yoktur, Mertkan Üçüncüoğlu. NBASKETBALL'da kadınlar için sadece Women's National Basketball Association var, yani kadın bir basketbolcu sadece WNBA'de oynayınca otomatik olarak kayda değer oluyor. Oynamayınca kişi hakkına olan bağımsız, güvenilir ve kapsamlı (significant) kaynaklar varsa kişi kayda değer oluyor. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 06:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Attığım örneklerde neredeyse hiçbir kaynak yok. Böyle daha çok fazla örnek var. Yani Türkiye'nin en üst düzey kadın basketbol liginde 3 yıldır düzenli oynayan, altyapı ve a milli takım kadrolarında yer alan bir oyuncuyu kayda değer olarak kabul etmek için hangi kaynaklar gerekiyor. Türkiye Basketbol Federasyonu güvenilir bir kaynak değil midir? ya da Uluslararası Basketbol Federasyonu FIBA bağımsız güvenilir bir kaynak değil mi? Gönderdiğim örneklerdeki gibi içerik olmayan sayfaların aksine Wikipedia için kapsamlı bir sayfa oluşturulmasına katkıda bulunmaya çalışıyorum. Mertkan Üçüncüoğlu (talk) 08:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Bahsettiğiniz TBF ve FIBA kaynakları "Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may be used to support content in an article, but it is not sufficient to establish notability. This includes listings in database sources with low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion" kapsamına giriyor. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 08:06, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Styyx. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:48, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Counter-Strike coaching bug scandal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Counter-Strike coaching bug scandal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counter-Strike coaching bug scandal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

عائشة المقدسي (talk) 14:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Styyx. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

G5

Do you want me to G5 Medyabar.com as well? Or do you want to leave it for improvement?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:17, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Ponyo That one might be notable, so I did a small copyedit for now. I'm going to take a deeper look into it tomorrow and maybe take it to AfD in case it fails NCORP. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 20:21, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Okie dokie.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:21, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Ponyo Tagged it for A7. The sources in the article (and a few similar not in the article: [1]) are written by İhlas Haber Ajansı and simply copied by other websites. The text mentions the regional director of İHA being invited, so I don't see how these are independent. General consensus on trwiki is that Haberler.com isn't reliable nor independent, so that source doesn't say much either. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 10:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Well done on the anaylysis. It's been moved to draft space in lieu of A7 deletion by Ritchie333, so I guess it gets to sit and entice this globally-locked sockmaster to keep editing the draft in perpetuity. Joy.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

The move to draft was simply a revert of this edit. As you can see from this edit, the community is more tolerant of drafts and less likely to delete them per G11. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
57		2022 24 Hours of Le Mans (talk)	Add sources
632		My Little Pony: Equestria Girls (talk)	Add sources
23		The Wild Adventures of Blinky Bill (talk)	Add sources
1,078		Harem (genre) (talk)	Add sources
202		Mullvad (talk)	Add sources
162		TouchWiz (talk)	Add sources
828		Natus Vincere (talk)	Cleanup
174		Tourism in Sri Lanka (talk)	Cleanup
707		Fnatic (talk)	Cleanup
332		Twilight Sparkle (talk)	Expand
84		Them's Fightin' Herds (talk)	Expand
151		My Little Pony (2010 toyline) (talk)	Expand
158		Dutch Grand Prix (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
466		Time-based One-Time Password (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
24		Sgares (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
90		Six Dharmas of Naropa (talk)	Merge
126		BBC Persian Television (talk)	Merge
22		AltRight Corporation (talk)	Merge
112		Equestria (talk)	Wikify
198		The Raccoons (talk)	Wikify
8		Mihri Hatun (talk)	Wikify
12		Consulate General of Switzerland, Istanbul (talk)	Orphan
5		Radi Dikici (talk)	Orphan
3		Rao Vihar (talk)	Orphan
3		Berkay Çatak (talk)	Stub
898		2021–22 Formula E World Championship (talk)	Stub
123		Fallout: Equestria (talk)	Stub
114		Tablet (confectionery) (talk)	Stub
17		Luca Soccer Club (talk)	Stub
9		Off to See the World (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Page mover and R2

Your recent draftifications have been done with redirect suppression because you are a global rollbacker. However, each of those draftifications immediately created a new page at the original mainspace article title with just the {{Db-r2}} tag on it. So, you should make a request at WP:PERM/PM to make yourself a page mover so that the R2-tagging does not happen again. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nominations

A question: Why are you nominating articles for deletion as redirects when they appear not in fact to be redirects? Hint; a redirect has a target article named at the foot of the text.----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Anthony Bradbury See the message sent to me above. Since I'm a global rollback, I can move articles to draft without leaving a redirect, however the MoveToDraft script automatically adds the template in the original mainspace article because I'm not a page mover here. I have no option to enable/disable anything, so this will probably go on until I get page mover rights (which I have applied for despite failing the criteria). ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 17:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

I understand. I suppose you appreciate that trawling through the CSD page finding these remnants wastes a significant amount of time? Could you not do something else here until your page mover approval is granted? Please note that in a 15 year admin history this is the first time I have come across this difficulty. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Filli Vanilli

Hello! Your submission of Filli Vanilli at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Screen Rant rankings

Hi, Styyx. Apologies for the double message but I just wanted to ask your opinion on something. At the present moment, we have several MLP: FIM episode articles that partially rely on Screen Rant rankings for notability. However, I've noticed that many of these rankings are just blurbs of the episode plots and I wouldn't call them "significant coverage". Since you have created a few of these, I'd like to ask your opinion on this. Do they qualify as significant coverage? If not, I think they should be redirected until notability can be established. Articles affected by this are:

• "The Best Night Ever"
• "Amending Fences"
• "The Perfect Pear"

And uncreated ones:

• "Party of One"
• "Lesson Zero"
• "The Cutie Re-Mark"

(Note: I have omitted "Pinkie Pride", "The Return of Harmony", "Twilight's Kingdom", "A Canterlot Wedding", etc. as they already establish notability without the rankings.) Pamzeis (talk) 11:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Pamzeis. Per GNG, the source doesn't have to be only about the subject. I remember from AfD's about people that we tend accept sources with 4 or more sentences, though I don't know it that is also the case for episodes, so Amending Fences and The Best Night Ever are pretty much on the edge, but I think The Perfect Pear is notable even without that. Will try to fix the DYK once I get home. Thanks for the message. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 11:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

My draft was decline

Hi Styyx, I've created a post for Yaron Rozen. It was declined because it doesn't have enough cites on the footer. The problem is that most of the sources are in Hebrew. The thing is Yaron Rozen has a post on the Hebrew Wikipedia. I just want to translate it to English. I've tried to do it in the Hebrew Wikipedia and they told m to do it here. Please help me understand if I'm doing something wrong This is the draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yaron_Rosen This is the one in Hebrew https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9F_%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%96%D7%9F — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.81.5.200 (talk) 13:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! According to our biographies of living persons policy, pretty much everything in a biography must be sourced and unsourced material must be removed. It doesn't matter if the sources are in a different language, you can still add the sources in Hebrew. Also, the subject of the page must meet the general notability guideline, and the draft in it's current state with a few sources that barely mention the subject doesn't show that. If you have any more questions, don't be afraid to ask me or post it at the articles for creation help desk. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 14:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Global rights policy#Global rollbackers

Please note that, per Wikipedia:Global rights policy#Global rollbackers, you are only permitted to use the suppressredirect right in the context of counter-vandalism efforts. A lot of the recent page moves you've been making seem to violate that policy. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Pppery I am aware of the policy. Pre 5 November it was because of the MoveToDraft script not working well (see #Page mover and R2 and #Speedy deletion nominations above). Since then I move it by hand and add a speedy tag without the script. The one you're referring to is probably Filli Vannili, which is a page I accidentally created myself with a typo in the title. Thanks for the reminder anyways. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 15:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Draft

Never ever move my articles to draft space without paying heed to each clause of WP:DRAFTIFY. You know your options. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Calm down king. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 16:50, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

If you believe that the prosecutor general—the equivalent of United States Attorney General—of a country is clearly plausibly notable, you are unintentionally (or not) propagating systematic bias.

Revert your move. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:51, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

That's a better tone.  Done. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 16:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion for Urnas Abiertas article?

Hi. Can you explain why you're deleting the article? Asaturn (talk) 10:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello Asaturn. The current references cited don't show that the organization meets the criteria listed at WP:ORG. In addition, the article actually hasn't been deleted, I've moved it to Draft:Urnas Abiertas, where you can freely work on the article and submit it via the articles for creation process. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 10:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

My bad, I misunderstood as I was still looking at the old link. As per the draft and "fixing it" - it is linked to from 2021 Nicaraguan general election and I have been attempting all week to make good faith additions of good citations to the main article, but two individuals who have been warned to stop continue to remove my edits in a blatant NPOV edit war. I opted to edit the article for the organization being cited in the main article instead. The notability of this org is important because they are the sole source of claims aimed at discrediting the official results of the 2021 general election in Nicaragua. I believe it is important, as the election is an ongoing event, to provide as much good information as possible. Removing this article from prime time removes vital information from Wikipedia. This org is cited in significant coverage from large global news organizations such as CNN. The main Nicaragua election article has been receiving tens of thousands of visitors per day. Please let me know what needs to be done to put the Urnas Abiertas article live again. I am making good faith attempts at adding solid information from sources that meet WP's policies. Happy to change anything that isn't technically correct in terms of the rules here. Asaturn (talk) 11:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

PS would it make more sense to you to put this information in the main election article instead? Asaturn (talk) 11:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi please disregard my last 2 messages. I have never created an article and missed the part of the process with submitting for review. Thanks for your time! Asaturn (talk) 11:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Ebrar Karakurt

Hi, on that page you're reverting some additions that at first didn't have sources, but the editor did add them in the latest revision. They may need some rewriting, but they do seem to be alright overall. Eik Corell (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello Eik Corell. I've dramatically cut the usage of quotes in the article. By the way, don't even bother trying to discuss stuff with him, I've tried it a million times already.... ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 18:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Filli Vanilli

On 24 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Filli Vanilli, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the title of the My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episode "Filli Vanilli" references the lip-syncing scandal of the German-French R&B duo Milli Vanilli? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Filli Vanilli. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Filli Vanilli), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Untitled

Hi I don't see an add topic button, just this add section so here I go. I tried to be bold and create a new page for Moira Smiley. I created a draft first. I guess I didn't publish the page properly. I realized I had accidently not capitalized her last name, so the only way I could find to correct it was to move it to a new page spelled correctly. Then it got flagged, so I marked it for deletion. I'd like to try again with a fresh page. I saved the text. Please advise if you would be so kind and then I'll try again without the redirect. thanks! Colliedog (talk) 16:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello Colliedog! I don't exactly remember every detail from the article. It had some external links in the body paragraph, which either should be removed or moved to a special section at the end of the article, if it's appropiate. To have an article in Wikipedia, the subject must meet the general notability guideline, which in short means that there must be multiple reliable, independent and significant sources about the subject. Also, I've fixed the message appearing on top of my page, thanks! ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 17:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Styyx. I'll try again and add a few more references. I believe she meets the general notability guidelines, so I'll add some more references and try again. Not sure what was wrong with links, so I'll make edits there as needed. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colliedog (talk • contribs) 17:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Styyx. Thanks for pointing out problems. I figured out what you meant about links and the external ones have been moved to that section at the bottom. I've added a couple more references to help with notability requirements. There's much more press coverage I'll add later but I'm hoping others will help with the heavy lifting once the page is discovered. thanks! Colliedog (talk) 19:15, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Request for review

Hi, thanks for reviewing my latest article. Could you care to do the same for this one too? Thanks. Tame (talk) 07:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Tamingimpala  Reviewed and added archive links this earlier today. Just barely got the time to properly answer. :D ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 18:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your participation in the November 2021 New Pages Patrol drive

		The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
		For reviewing more than 500 articles during the backlog drive.

Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 554 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. (t · c) buidhe 12:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Shoxrux Hamdamov h

Hello I am gulya from Uzbekistan. I wanted to write information about Uzbek actor. I have done it some days ago. But you declined. I don’t know why. Everything was normal as I think. It’s draft shoxrux Hamdamov https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Common_sourcing_mistakes_(notability) can I have your email or WhatsApp address? Maybe you’ll help me by publishing my article.. please .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GJAHANA (talk • contribs) 12:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello GJAHANA! The subject of the article must meet the general notability guideline, which means that there have to be multiple reliable, independent and significant sources about the actor. Anyone can upload to YouTube, thus it isn't considered to be reliable. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 12:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Can I ask you? is there any person who can help me to publish my article which - I’ve wrote about the Uzbek actor Shoxrux Hamdamov. It’s declined by you. I am the new user of Wikipedia. I want to know what was my mistake. any information at google. I am his manager . We want to share a full of information about him. If I can’t publish- is there anyone who can help us to publish the page about him? We can pay. Or maybe there is any company that publish biographies about actors? Or some authors? We have got all information, youtube pages, a lot of movies links web pages about him only we don’t have any information in Wikipedia. We want to share and open a Wikipedia page for him. Please Let me Know? Or maybe you will help me? Can you contact me- via email — Preceding unsigned comment added by GJAHANA (talk • contribs) 12:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

I echo my response above. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 17:26, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Solo Türk

Hi! I saw your DYK-nom on SoloTürk, and wanted to congratulate you for that. Unfortunately, my article "Solo Türk" on the same topic, of which I have a copy, was deleted in September 2015. I wish you success, and hope that you will create many interesting Turkey-related articles. Best regards. CeeGee 13:52, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello CeeGee! I saw the AfD when redirecting Solo Türk to the article after creating it. The main two delete arguments were lack of sources and countries having multiple solo aircraft teams per year. I think both issues are non-existent at the moment with the sourcing in the article and the fact that SoloTürk has been the only solo aircraft of the TAF for over 10 years now. The 10 year anniversary also resulted in a lot more sources, so I don't see this being renominated anytime soon. :) Feel free to add any significant information that I missed to the article. Cheers! ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 14:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

• I wish you good luck for your article. It is a very nice one. Congrats. CeeGee 10:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Inviting to join deletion discussion

@Styyx, As someone who previously contested in favor of this article, and being the initial reviewer, I request and invite you to join the discussion of its deletion started by User:Tytrox, and share your opinion. Thanks. -- Tame (talk) 07:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Özlem Tekin

I think she's significant. That's why Özlem Tekin's page is really developed. We still listen her songs, for example Aşk Her Şeyi Affeder Mi? a song that you can hear on the street of Turkey in 2021. I believe music is international and if it's not enough there are many movies and series she performed. And I found she was the main character in some. For example;| Karaoğlan. BurakD53 (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

For your excellent work on those village articles - very much appreciated. For info, and if you have time and/or are interested, pretty much all of the related villages in the template at the foot of the article have also had the redirect treatment done to them. I don't want to burden you with a ton of work, but if any of those places jump out at you as possible expansions, that would be fantastic. Thanks again! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Lugnuts My time on Wikipedia has been quite limited lately, but I've converted two more redirects back into an article. I can only call this an absolute joke... ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 18:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for this. Yes, I echo your comment. I'd say more, but I'm keeping my big mouth shut to avoid any trouble! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:36, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Article review

Hello Styyx, thanks again for rescuing sources for all those articles! I recently created an article that another reviewer judged possibly non-notable, imo, against good sense. The article Anja Daems had indeed been deleted in the past, but this shouldn't be a bias against it, or should it? There were six sources to Belgian national publishers in my first version 1. For those familiar with Belgium the subject is obviously notable, but for those who aren't, like the reviewer, that's still enough to prove notability, which can be confirmed by simply googling Anja Daems. I was then forced to add more sources, which was absolutely unnecessary and makes the article look funny at best and ugly at worst now, 2.

If you have time, I ask you to review the article measuring it against the same yardstick of Linde Merckpoel. Thank you in advance.--Cassius Fury (talk) 12:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello Cassius Fury! Previously deleted pages can be deleted under speedy G4. However the article in question was deleted over 7 years ago after a PROD and not a deletion discussion, so it is ineligible for this criteria. Looking at the sources and doing a search, I see enough reliable and independent ones in Dutch, so I marked the page as patrolled. The reference bombing you've done can obviously be removed now. :) Have a good day! ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 12:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, and thanks! When creating the page I did see it had been deleted because it "didn't seem notable" to another editor, but honestly I didn't even check the previous version nor looked at the date of the deletion! If by over seven days ago you mean it was deleted in the past weeks, than maybe it's more comprehensible, or less serious, that someone tagged it as possibly non-notable a priori.

I will figure out whether to trim the WP:REFBOMB or spread the sources by lengthening the article a little bit. Have a good day too =D .--Cassius Fury (talk) 13:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Turkish villages

Thanks for expanding some of these Turkish village stubs. Hopefully more in-depth coverage can be found, since most of the sources are just passing mentions, but it's a start. A major concern at ANI was that Koyumuz is an unreliable source, so do you think you could update the population figures with a reliable source when you restore? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dlthewave (talk • contribs)

Hello Dlthewave! I found a report by TÜİK that shows the population of each village in Düzce as of 2000 (so 12 years before what is mentioned in most articles). I'll replace the Köyümüz source with this one and change the population in the infobox accordingly. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 14:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! I'm considering opening a wider community discussion about articles sourced only to these population tables, since tables do not establish notability per WP:NGEO and have led to problems with inappropriate article creation in the past. –dlthewave ☎ 14:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm DMySon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Anja Daems, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DMySon (talk) 15:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Sorry to bother again

Hi Styyx, sorry to bother you again. After you reviewed the aforementioned article, the user I mentioned had the great idea of unreviewing it 1. I had tried to advise the user regarding what I perceive as a mistake made by them (the non-objective or careless review of the article), so that they may not make it in the future. I was not hoping to change their mind regarding this article, as probably visible in my message to them 2, but I had the intention of actually helping them in their extremely important task as reviewer by letting them know their mistakes. They definitely didn't like it, and the article got unreviewed.

It appears there is some fundamental error of judgement by the user, because if the article clearly met notability before, now there are thrice as many sources. Or maybe there's some problem between this user and me, or the user in the article, but: is retaliation allowed at Wikipedia?

I definitely want to report what happened, but I'm not sure the matter is serious enough to be brought to the administrators' attention. Hope to get your precious advice once again.--Cassius Fury (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Looks like the problem is solved thanks to your mediation. Here's some baklava and, though I'm kind of a newbie, let me know if you need help with some article!--Cassius Fury (talk) 17:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Cassius Fury I usually don't work on articles much. Thanks for the yummy baklava! ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 17:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for SoloTürk

On 23 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SoloTürk, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite being an aerobatic demonstration aircraft, SoloTürk (pictured) is still used in some military operations of the Turkish Air Force? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SoloTürk. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SoloTürk), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,026 views (709.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)