User talk:Schwede66/Archive 27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Category:Living people removals[edit]

Please read the first paragraph on the Category:Year of birth missing (living people) page - "It must appear in all such articles alongside Category:Living people, although it is not a subcategory of Category:Living people and cannot be used instead of that category or serve as a combination of both categories." --Bamyers99 (talk) 18:02, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bamyers99: That was news to me. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Schwede66 22:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

Administrator changes

added Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
readded Floquenbeam • Lectonar
removed DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana

CheckUser changes

removed Callanecc • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed Callanecc • Fox • HJ Mitchell • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Schwede66/Archive 27,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019[edit]

Hello Schwede66,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
  • Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
Not English
  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for keeping an eye on my talk page for me! -- Dolotta (talk) 20:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What qualifies as a castle?[edit]

How are there ten castles in New Zealand? this source only mentions two and Category:Castles of New Zealand only has two articles. The subcategory of historic homes may be misleading because historic homes are often cottages, not castles. There is a search result on google that says "Top 10 Best New Zealand Castles", but if you go to the website and click on, for example, castles in Kerikeri, the first entry is a mission station and the second entry is an Anglican church. Do you have a reference to verify that there are ten castles in New Zealand? I don't think old cottages, hotels or even large church buildings are technically castles. Thanks.--210.48.190.54 (talk) 01:59, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I think that rather than Category:Castles of New Zealand you meant Category:Castles in New Zealand? --David Biddulph (talk) 02:07, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Schwede66/Archive 27,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years of editing[edit]

Hey, Schwede66. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society[edit]

Dear Schwede66/Archive 27,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First edit day![edit]

Happy First Edit Day, Schwede66, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! PATH SLOPU 10:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.

Technical news

  • As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Schwede66/Archive 27,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on en dashes[edit]

Hi Schwede66, You recently edited a page with the comment "fixed dashes using a script User:HenryCrun15 you've done enough editing to know when to use endashes, haven't you?"

Thanks for the feedback, and I will endeavour to follow Wikipedia's style guide as closely as I can. Just a heads up, though, that this probably wasn't the politest way to phrase this. Perhaps, if you encounter a similar issue with an editor in the future, you could write something more like "Hi, [name], I notice you use hyphens for date ranges. Wikipedia's style guide [link] requires en dashes in date ranges. Thanks, [your name]."

Thanks for all your contributions in making Wikipedia the best resource it can be. HenryCrun15 (talk) 21:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback noted. Thanks; you are (of course) right. My apologies. Schwede66 21:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lutz Ulbrich[edit]

Hello, Schwede66,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Lutz Ulbrich for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 10:22, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my bad. Should have read the revision history... Hughesdarren (talk) 10:25, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and graded an article from "start" to "C"... should I have?[edit]

I went ahead WP:BOLDLY and updated Anthony Whitaker from "start" to "C" because it was last assessed five years ago, and it's much better now. I figured down on the bottom rungs of the article quality scale, it's probably not going to be noticed (partly since NZ articles are unfortunately often overlooked in the grand scheme of things). I certainly wouldn't presume to randomly self-rate an article much above C, but I also figure that I've been on WP for long enough now (2004) that I've got enough experience to know roughly where an article is at, following WP:DEV etc. yet I'm a bit stumped as it is hard to tell how to proceed, reading WP:PRG. This is the first time I've presumed to re-rate an article that clearly isn't "start"; do you think it is at "C" or even "B" level? I'd be interested what you think (or if I've been a terrible human being who should rethink his life choices). Cheers! — Jon (talk) 08:12, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora Jon, thanks for amending the rating. At the same time, you could have rated the WikiProject Biography banner, too. Wikiprojects generally rate the same. How to go about rating WPNZ articles is best described at Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/Assessment. If you'd like to improve this particular article so that it meets B class, here are some pointers (and this list may be incomplete):
  • the lead is too short
  • the lead mentions facts that are not contained in the body of the article
  • the article is on the brief side
  • an obvious area for expansion is to list the approximately two dozen other new species of reptiles that he helped describe and name
  • address the 'citation needed' tags that I've placed
I'd very much appreciate if you would help with rating are reassessing New Zealand articles. Happy to look over your shoulder and provide as much guidance as you want to get. Schwede66 00:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, well I'm happy to help. Side note, while creating the Orchestra Wellington article, I've had someone come along and "review" it, and removed the (fair-use) logo and the official website link from the page, which is a bit weird. Can you comment? Jon (talk) 01:58, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Jon, I see you have restored the logo and that's fair enough. I guess it's a very short article and for that reason, the URL doesn't need to be repeated as an external link given that it's already in the ibox. Schwede66 05:14, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harriet Bouslog[edit]

Hi there! Thank you so much for adding Bouslog's maiden name to the lede. I had another problem with names in this article that I wonder if you can help me with. Harriet divorced Charles in 1950, and remarried a man named Stephen Sawyer. [[1]] When she appealed her law license's suspension in 1959, the case was called "In re Sawyer", because she sometimes went by Harriet Bouslog Sawyer. [[2]] How do you think we should show that in the article? I skipped the topic entirely because I wasn't sure where it would best fit. I would love your opinion, or any changes you'd like to make to the article. Thanks! Mcampany (talk) 20:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good to me! Thanks so much. Mcampany (talk) 05:04, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plz Explain[edit]

Have I done anything wrong? Just say it Im a new editor on Wikipedia so I dont know what every rule on this site is.... Alejxon (talk) 13:31, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alejxon: This is the wrong place for that discussion. Let's have it on your talk page. Schwede66 17:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When did newspaper= become work= ?[edit]

In this edit you did today here for Great Expectations, one change made was in cite news references, changing newspaper= to work=. Why make that change? I thought I re-read the cite format in the last week or two, and newspaper= matches cite news. Just curious. --Prairieplant (talk) 22:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Prairieplant: Thanks for your query. As you can see in Template:Cite news/doc, the parameter 'newspaper' is an alias for the parameter 'work'. It's an incidental edit; the main edit with the article in question was replacing a hyphen with an endash in a page range as per MOS:ENDASH. Schwede66 22:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter November 2019[edit]

Hello Schwede66,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 814 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools
  • It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
  • It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes
  • Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
  • Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comma after day of week[edit]

I can't find anything that discusses whether or not to put the comma after the day of the week. Obviously you need it in MDY but I wouldn't think you need it in DMY. Where does it say you have to put a comma after the day of the week in a DMY date?  Nixinova  T / C   18:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora Nixinova, I was pretty sure that the manual of style deals with it but that is not the case. There was a relevant discussion early this year, though. Have a look how it's formatted in that discussion and the pertinent issue of including the weekday in the first instance. Schwede66 19:12, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They don't really talk much about the actual formatting of D-DMY and just give it as an example, then go on to discuss whether or not to actually put the day of the week in the articles. So I don't think there's really a consensus for anything. The comma is probably unnecessary in D-DMY as it flows better without it and its in just the right order to do without commas. E.g., "Sat 16 Nov 2019" reads better than "Sat, 16 Nov 2019" and "Sat, Nov 16, 2019".  Nixinova  T / C   19:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nixinova, it's not in MOS because, as they argue, the weekday is generally not needed. I'm currently working on an article where the weekday is of relevance (the convention of shifting election day from a Wednesday to a Saturday occurred with the 1941 local elections). What is the article that you are working on? Is the weekday needed, or is that detail superfluous? Does it add encyclopedic content? If it's not needed, then the discussion about the comma is moot. Schwede66 19:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's of your revert here.  Nixinova  T / C   19:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited that article. See what you think. Schwede66 20:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's probably fine.  Nixinova  T / C   20:28, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, South African Hip Hop Awards 2019, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 16:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scope creep, could you please let me know what the problem was? Schwede66 22:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Schwede66: It was reviewed before user:Ceethekreator was blocked as a sock. I unreviewed all the ones he has reviewed. Can you re-review it again. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 22:16, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Schwede66 22:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2019[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).

Administrator changes

added EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
removed Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂

CheckUser changes

readded Beeblebrox
removed Deskana

Interface administrator changes

readded Evad37

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter December 2019[edit]

A graph showing the number of articles in the page curation feed from 12/21/18 - 12/20/19

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 Rosguill (talk) 47,395 Patrol Page Curation
2 Onel5969 (talk) 41,883 Patrol Page Curation
3 JTtheOG (talk) 11,493 Patrol Page Curation
4 Arthistorian1977 (talk) 5,562 Patrol Page Curation
5 DannyS712 (talk) 4,866 Patrol Page Curation
6 CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 3,995 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 3,812 Patrol Page Curation
8 Boleyn (talk) 3,655 Patrol Page Curation
9 Ymblanter (talk) 3,553 Patrol Page Curation
10 Cwmhiraeth (talk) 3,522 Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck[edit]

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはSchwede66たちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 04:03, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Schwede66![edit]

Happy New Year!
Hello Schwede66:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 05:29, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Schwede66/Archive_27&oldid=1145926474"