User talk:Salvio giuliano/Archive 36

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fowler&fowler[edit]

Your assumption about Fowler&fowler is wrong. Please see this Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=459421228 Pritzker (talk) 23:58, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, let me apologise for the tardy reply; that said, you are definitely right: that was not an isolated incident... I'm now keeping an eye on the user, however, and I've warned him that those rollback reversions were inappropriate; should he persist, I'll certainly sanction him. I will not do so now as that would only be punitive (whereas all sanctions are supposed to be preventative) and I take him at his word when he undertakes not to misuse the flag any more. Should I miss an inappropriate rollback, please do feel free to report it either here on on ANI. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:25, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 November2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:11, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HDtracks wikipedia page banned[edit]

Hello, we are trying to set up a objective page for our audio company called HDtracks. It is the number one high definition audio company and we still do not have a wikipedia page. We can't set one up because it seems that it has been removed.

The page leads to this contact form. If you could let us know what's going on that would be fantastic. We'd really like to see a page for our company up. Thanks please e-mail this e-mail below.

You shouldn't be writing about your company in the first place, chummer. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:31, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how you got here, as it appears it was not I who deleted the page; however, the article was deleted twice under speedy deletion criterion A7 as it failed to indicate how HDtracks is significant or important. Aside from familiarising yourself with the guideline Jéské Couriano so kindly provided, I'd like to invite to review Wikipedia notability requirements — as only notable entities qualify for inclusion on Wikipedia —. If you believe you meet that threshold, my advice would be to create an account and then start a userspace draft and, then, ask for feedback at WP:FEEDBACK. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:35, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:JAT6634[edit]

Dear Salvio Giuliano

This is User:JAT6634 aka James Harrison I promise to make no more accounts I do give up I completly apoligise for what I have done sorry mate. I am only going to use Wikipedia for information that I need Sorry

James Harrison.

I'm sorry, but I cannot do anything, even though it was I who closed the ban discussion; you were banned by the community and no one admin can unban you. Only the community and Arbcom can. If you really wish to get back to editing constructively, you just have to wait at least six months without socking and then ask for the standard offer. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:41, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am perfectly fine not editing all I'll do now is use wikipedia for information. Sorry! :)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout[edit]

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 09:21, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding copyright content to a page[edit]

hello

You recently cleared my block. thanks. I own the copyright to the image 'the hands resist him' I normally get requests by many people asking to for permission to use the image so I really need to add this information to the page, can I do that?

Regards

Darren

You cannot place the copyright info in the article; you can place it on the file's page, I believe (though I don't usually edit in the File: namespace); my advice would be to ask on the Help desk, however, to make sure. Sorry I can't be of more assistance. Salvio Let's talk about it! 18:49, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 November 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:18, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HyperEdit[edit]

Hi, this is with regard to deletion of the Codelobster page and a related question. I am not the creator of that page, just a user of the software - in no way connected to the developers/company of the software. I was surprised to see that Codelobster does not have the notability required by Wikipedia and understand that is why it was deleted.

I just ran across this new page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HyperEdit for another editor. I cleaned up a few sections in it which were more like usage tutorials, and a dead external link. I wanted to ask - In your opinion do you think this article meets the notability clause of Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberajith (talk • contribs)

Admittedly, I've not followed WP:BEFORE, yet, but, at the moment, in my opinion, the article does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements as it does not seem to have received significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources, but only a mention in one... Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:42, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)[edit]

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 November 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:41, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YGM[edit]

Hello, Salvio giuliano. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

AM

removal of external link added by me[edit]

Hi First of all I want to express my apology that I didn't read all the policies and guidelines before doing the addition. I still haven't read. I did so because I was aware that I am adding a link that is extremely useful for the people who come to wikipedia searching about TOPIK. I didn't mean to do any advertising or something like that. The blog that I put the link of is one of the very few good resources available on net about TOPIK tests. I will read all the guidelines whenever I get time.. But I offer my apologies for the moment.. I won't repeat the mistake. Thank you

Regards, Satish — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scsatyarthi (talk • contribs)

No biggie. However, even though it might be useful, repeatedly adding external links on Wikipedia's entries is disallowed under WP:ELNO, although I appreciate you were doing it in good faith. Should you need anything, please do feel free to ping me. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:21, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...[edit]

...for this! Best wishes, SuperMarioMan 12:25, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure! I have your userpage on my watchlist and am always happy to swoop down on vandalism. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:40, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New editor in a spot of bother[edit]

Hi Salvio. Could you possibly have a look at my advice here? It appears they have chosen one of their friends' name as a username, and that friend is not happy. Thank you! --Shirt58 (talk) 10:42, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very good answer; they've not filed a rename request. Hopefully, all will be good, now. Cheers. -- Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:49, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And thank you! ps: I've Edited a few of our comments for clarity.--Shirt58 (talk) 11:03, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem there; sometimes, I don't immediately realise that what I'm writing may make little to no sDjathinkimacowboy 17:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ense to someone unfamiliar with Wiki-jargon... Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:10, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Erikeltic continued trouble[edit]

Would you be so kind as to explain to me why the vandalism report is now deleted, and why you suggest I take this to ANI? Which I think you know very well will do nothing for me? It's taken me all day just to get this far. I'm being persecuted and badgered. :Because WP:AIV is only for persistent spammers and vandals and Erikeltic's edits do not constitute vandalism; therefore, your report was inactionable on AIV. If you feel harassed, you can start a thread on WP:ANI, as I suggested, but please be aware of WP:Boomerang. Salvio Let's talk about it! 18:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The section is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#MangoWong Block review - Sitush (talk) 03:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note; I see that MW has been blocked again, so I guess my input would be quite superfluous now... Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

regarding page you deleted under MfD in October[edit]

Hi, I just noticed you deleted userspace article per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Daniel Gebreezgiher back in October. I noted in the MfD nomination that there was an identical copy at the user:talk page as well, but it appears that slipped under the radar, could you please take a look at User Talk:Daniel Gebreezgiher and action as you see fit. Thanks. --ClubOranjeT 10:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zapped, thanks for letting me know. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:13, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 November 2011[edit]

Indentity confirmed[edit]

Hello Salvio - just a quick note to let you know that the Peter Greenaway account has been verified via OTRS. I will add the OTRS confirming ticket number to the talk page, but I was unsure whether you would like to lift the block or if you would prefer I do it...--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've just unblocked; thanks for your message: you were most kind! Salvio Let's talk about it! 01:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Citing sources[edit]

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Citing sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 14:42, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Salvio_giuliano/Archive_36&oldid=1141998715"