User talk:OBrienMadHouse
Regarding edits to Nashville franklin leslie[edit]
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. 
Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 00:24, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks.
Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 00:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Buckskin frank leslie, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://web.archive.org/web/20050211045252/. As a copyright violation, Buckskin frank leslie appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Buckskin frank leslie has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Buckskin frank leslie. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Buckskin frank leslie, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.
--Samir 
(the scope) धर्म 04:32, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Mr. O'Brian,
- While I do appreciate your additions to the List of western outlaws, my reversions to Franklin Leslie were to remove copyright material belonging to another website. As Wikipedia is often liable, both legally and ethicly, for copyright infringment I hope you understand why your additions as they stood had to have been removed. Your recent creation of Nashville Franklin Leslie contains that same material and will most likely have to be removed at some point in the future unless you are able to gain the authors permission. MadMax 18:01, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Frank Canton[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Frank M. Canton, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gunslinger.com/canton.html. As a copyright violation, Frank M. Canton appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Frank M. Canton has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Frank M. Canton. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Frank M. Canton, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.
(previous unsigned comment by Mr Stephen)
William Owen "Buckey" O'Neill[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as William Owen "Buckey" O'Neill, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.spanamwar.com/Oneill.htm. As a copyright violation, William Owen "Buckey" O'Neill appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. William Owen "Buckey" O'Neill has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:William Owen "Buckey" O'Neill. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at William Owen "Buckey" O'Neill, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.
-- Mr Stephen 10:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
I have removed your recent contribution to Nate Champion, as it was copied from another site. Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. Mr Stephen 10:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Sophocles[edit]
 |
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! You recently added an external link to YouTube in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source. Per WP:COPYRIGHT: External sites can possibly violate copyright. Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem, as long as you have made a reasonable effort to determine that the page in question is not violating someone else's copyright. If it is, please do not link to the page. Knowingly and intentionally directing others to a site that violates copyright has been considered a form of copyright infringement in the United States (Intellectual Reserve v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry). Also, linking to a page that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on Wikipedia and its editors. If the site in question is making fair use of the material, linking is fine. Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information. --Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 02:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Edits to Earp Vendetta Ride, Etc.[edit]
Would you please STOP making historical edits on the basis of "information" in I Married Wyatt Earp and other supposed writings by Sarah Marcus? That book is now known to be half-fabricated, with the parts you're using simply having been made up by Glenn Boyer, from a manuscript which does not, and never did, exist. The Cason manuscript exists, but Boyer made up the rest as good Western fiction, and has essentially admitted this. In any case, we don't write history based on a manuscript that somebody says they once had and have now lost. If you're using some other sources, cite them. Thanks! SBHarris 20:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
CassidyTillemans[edit]
Attacks in the article CassidyTillemans[edit]
Please do not make personal attacks on other people as you did at CassidyTillemans. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Merope 18:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Matthew O'Brien[edit]
A tag has been placed on Matthew O'Brien requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Travistalk 03:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
President of the United States[edit]
Don't forget that he will not be President until January. Regards, DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:09, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
BLATANT VANDALISM WILL NOT BE TOLERATED[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing; we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. Please stop; If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. JBsupreme (talk) 18:58, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. tedder (talk) 19:11, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
List of Deadwood's Famous and Infamous listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Deadwood's Famous and Infamous. Since you had some involvement with the List of Deadwood's Famous and Infamous redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)