User talk:Nightfall87

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives
Archive 1 2012-01-31
Archive 2 2012-09-22
Archive 3 2013-09-12

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stefan Stojanović (footballer born 1992) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Stojanović (footballer born 1992) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444Talk 05:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saša Blagojević for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saša Blagojević is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saša Blagojević until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444Talk 09:06, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Milan Vukašinović for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milan Vukašinović is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milan Vukašinović until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444Talk 09:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ABA Liga Category[edit]

Hi! I'm just dropping by to let you know about the new user category I think you might be interested in joining, ABA Liga supporters. Keep up the good work with your basketball-related contributions! --OxymoronNBG (talk) 21:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Results[edit]

Hello Nightfall. You recently updated the Serbian election results, but left the results table source to the original B92 source. Where did you get the updated results from? Cheers, Number 57 19:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I have added source to most current official results by republican electorial Commission. Cheers. Nightfall87 (talk) 19:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Live updates[edit]

Hi.

Please do not update statistics or scores while a match is in progress. Instead, wait until the match has finished before updating. At WikiProject Football there is a consensus not to add live scores and also a consensus not to update any statistics while a match is in progress. Without live updates it is easier to avoid duplicate information and errors from being published on the article.

Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon[edit]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Nightfall87. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pitanje[edit]

Voleo bih da znam jedan odgovor. Koliko zaista misliš da se posvetiš listi transfera koju si napravio? Pitam iz prostog razloga što nema svrhe nabacati sve ovo, ako ne postoji volja da se sekcije popune na pravi način. Znam da je najlakše napraviti klicu artikla pa da to neko drugi popunjava, ali ja sam iz praktičnih razloga prestao to da radim. Očekivao sam da će neko da uradi nešto slično, ali sam svakako uradio sandbox gde je već napakovan određen broj transfera. I iskreno gledano, sve me je manje briga za to kako će večiti da posluju sve dok se Evropi ne uradi nešto značajnije. Ovakve liste u principu i ne postoje zbog večitih, jer oni obično to imaju kroz podkategorije u pregledu sezone, već upravo zbog ovih manjih klubova da bismo koliko-toliko posvetili pažnju i njima. Zato i postavljam ovo pitanje, jer znam koliko se nas dvojica-trojica trudimo da sve to raščlanimo i doteramo, dok pojedinci prekrajaju kako se njima sviđa. Motivacija od roka do roka sve više slabi svima nama, a još ako nikoga nije briga, onda tek nema svrhe raditi ovo. Svi smo mi videli da je mali Bleki prešao na "Čizmu", ali prelazni rok još uvek zvanično nije počeo. Staviti na listu Temnić, pa čak i PLS uopšte, nema svrhe ako će te sekcije ostati prazne. Ja sam to prošle godine uradio jer svake srede izlaze zvanični dokumenti iz FSS-a, gde su svi transferi proknjiženi i to je jedini validan izvor, ali je posao da se sve to ubaci ovde ogroman. Stoga ako imaš želju da ovo izguraš do kraja, ili da bar učestvuješ, slobodno mi piši. Niko nas ne prisiljava naravno, nas dvojica-trojica izginemo sa ovim listama za svaku polu-sezonu, ali me boli kada neko nešto prekraja bez naročitog razloga, već iz hira ili neke lične sujete. Ništa lično, napominjem samo zato što se nadam da kao jedan od iskusnijih ovde znaš na šta mislim. Lotom (talk) 14:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evo, baš sam i planirao da ti napišem. Pazi ovako, fora je da se igrači do 20 godina u srpskoj ligi i zoni računaju kao bonusi i svi klubovi su u obavezi da u prvom poluvremenu imaju dva takva igrača na terenu. U SuperLigi, klubovi u tu B listu mogu da uguraju dosta igrača, s tim što bi oni valjda trebalo da budu omladinci, ili igrači ponikli u klubu do 21 godine starosti. U Evropi, igrači koji su ponikli su klubu (mislim da moraju da imaju staž od minimum tri godine) računaju se u B listu i mislim da je ograničenje u godinama isto do 21. Koliko sam upoznat, to su kriterijumi za B listu. Trebalo bi da svi oni u tom slučaju idu u B listu, ali su na klupskom sajtu dodati u prvi tim, a i imaju već određeni seniorski staž u Zvezdi. Luka Ilić je i prošle sezone trenirao sa prvim timom, ali je njegov mlađi brat Ivan pre njega dobio priliku da debituje. Dalje, svaki od ostalih igrača u ovoj B sekciji ima neku foru. Ovi sa brojevima su bili licencirani u prethodnoj sezoni. Stojanović je igrao za prvi tim protiv Radnika u Surdulici. Mijailović je već duže vreme sa prvim timom, ali mu je istekao ugovor posle pozajmice u Bežaniji. "Na ledu je." Stojić i Maksić su kao omladinci igrali za B tim najviše zbog nedostatka štopera. Panović, Romanić i Senić su bili na dvojnim registracijama, kao i Stanković i Stojanović. Vićić je branio za Kolubaru i Bežaniju tokom prethodne sezone, tako da je u drugom delu sezone bio na klasičnoj pozajmici. Igrač po propisu ima pravo da nastupi za najviše dva kluba u jednoj takmičarskoj sezoni. Senić, iako nije ponikao u klubu, takođe ima nastup za B tim, a još uvek upada u U20 okvir i ima dugoročan ugovor. Nije međutim bio licenciran za SuperLigu, pošto je i on sa OFK-om iskoristio to pravo na dva kluba. Platiša je raskinuo pozajmicu pre kraja sezone i igrao protiv Gračanice. Tada je i Aučo priključen ekipi, ali on zvanično i nije bio igrač Zvezde. Kako je imao problem sa vizom i stigao van prelaznog roka, formalno je potpisao sa OFK-om na 6 meseci. Mitrev je u Makedoniji već igrao seniorski fudbal, '99 je i igra za omladince. Svi ostali klinci iz ove sekcije su bili priključeni treninzima prvom tima kao stipendisti ili profi igrači. U sekciji ostali sam ubacio povratnike sa pozajmica i čuvene fantome koji su ili pod ugovorom ili su im papiri još uvek u klubu. Ovaj Miloš Vukić je, kao nekada Igor Mijović, već godinama u klubu, mada mislim da mu je sada istekao ugovor. Jovović je licenciran, tako da ne može ni u jednu sekciju sem prvog tima, pošto je za B listu mator. Zé Marcos je najavljen kao zalog za budućnost, te ga vodeći se tom logikom stavljam među ostale. Za omladince neće moći da igra jer je '98, pa je tu kategoriju prerastao. Babić i Jovičić će biti licencirani sigurno, tako da nema potrebe za odvajamo bilo šta kada je rok za prijavu do večeras, ukoliko se ne varam. Imaćemo pravo na jednog dodatnog igrača 48 sati pred utakmicu. Sve ovo ovako razvrstavam iz jednog veoma prostog razloga. Imamo previše igrača pod ugovorima i ako želimo da imamo bilo kakvu predstavu o tome gde se nalaze, logično je da ih negde ubacimo. Lično mi se to gomilanje ni malo ne sviđa, ali je to boljka koja nas prati godinama. Lotom (talk) 16:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mislim, što se mene tiče, možeš sve ovo da prebrišeš ukoliko želiš, ali mislim da ni to nije najsrećnije rešenje. Sve su to članovi kluba, ili igrači pod nekom vrstom ugovora. Prelazni rok je u toku i to će se verovatno najvećim delom raščistiti. Mnogi će na pozajmice, neki će dobiti papire. Draško Đorđević, recimo, ima dugoročan ugovor, ali i ozbiljan prelom noge koji je zaradio u OFK-i i on do zime vrlo verovatno neće igrati fudbal. Moram i da te pohvalim za odlično odrađen pregled sezone i redovno ažuriranje. Lotom (talk) 16:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nema šanse, nećemo mi taj kriterijum moći da pronađemo nikad, bojim se. Takvo je celokupno stanje u našem fudbalu, jedino što nas u poslednje dve sezone bar savez pokriva zvaničnom dokumentacijom. Sve što možemo je da se ovako izdogovaramo ovako međusobno, pa da vidimo kako ćemo to da napravimo. Možda nije loše da sakrijemo te sekcije. Počeo sam ja bio nešto da radim ove sezone koje fale, ali nikako da završim to do kraja. Lotom (talk) 17:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Je l' ovo u pitanju? Daj onda da vratimo i Miloševića, Andriju Lukovića, malog Stankovića, pa i Pavkova. Čoveče, je l' ti i dalje odbijaš da prihvatiš da smo ažurniji od svih sajtova naših klubova zajedno. Ako pogledaš Ivanovu stranu, videćeš da je već bio izlistan sa seniorima, ukoliko se ne sećaš. Uostalom, ima klauzulu po kojoj mora da nastupi za prvi tim. Drugo, daj da onda Luku vratimo u B listu, jer ima pravo na još godinu dana sa omladincima. Vidiš da sam ubacio izvore svuda, baš zbog ovih koji misle da znaju bolje. Pouzdano znam da se itekako obraća pažnja na ovo što pišemo i drago mi je zbog toga. Ako ćemo "da ga merimo" na ovaj način, ja sam onda van. Daj neki predlog kako ti misliš da je najbolje pa neka bude tako. Celog dana krpim i vraćam vandalizme i stvarno nemam snage za besmislene rasprave. Možda deluje drsko, ali mi je neverovatno glupo da ratujemo oko banalnosti. Uzdravlje i izvini ako si se našao uvređenim! Lotom (talk) 18:07, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Nightfall87. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yugoslavia national under-20 basketball team listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yugoslavia national under-20 basketball team. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion :) --IndexAccount (talk) 11:30, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have just created the article about this season, following an article in basket.ba with the matches of the first round. It seems that all the teams will join the competition in the regular season, but do you know how will the league work this season? Or if not, where can I take that info for completing/fixing the article? Thank you and cheers. Asturkian (talk) 08:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Nightfall87. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Red Star Belgrade[edit]

Why did you remove all the successes of the FK Red Star? Semifinals of Cup Winners' Cup and so on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoCar (talkcontribs) 19:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't me. Nightfall87 (talk) 19:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lista stranih igraca[edit]

Pozdrav brate, nadam se da si dobro i da su tvoja porodica, voljeni i prijatelji svi na broju i svi lepo provodite leto. Vidim da mi menjas i dalje one godine, pa ne secam da li sam ti ikad objasnio razlog i poentu zasto radim te godine drugacije. Stvar je ta da kad sam napravio listu to je bilo 2009. godine, a tada je informacija na internetu bila znatno manja nego sto je danas. Tada sam imao recimo za ceo period od 1923 do 2006 liste samo po sezonama. Recimo, znao sam da su Jia i Liu bili u Partizanu u sezonama 1987/88 i 1988/89 i to je sve. Za razliku od danas, tada je najlogicnije bilo staviti igracima sezone koje su igrali, ako vise od jedne, znaci prvu godinu prve sezone, i zadnju godinu zadnje. Tako smo dosli do Jia & Liu (1987–1989). Tada 2009. mozes da vidis da je proprorcija igraca za koje sam imao informaciju samo po sezonama (recimo i nasi Almanasi su liste pravili po sezonama ne praveci razliku izmedju onih koji su igrali prvi deo ili drugi) bila znatno veca, i zato sam odarao taj sistem upisivanja godina, odnosno, ne godina, vec sezona.

E sad, prosla je cela jedna decenija, sad se vec nakupila vecina za koje imamo tacne podatke koje su polusezone igrali. Ali ja sam nastavio sa starim sistemom, uspisujem sezonu, ne kalendarsku godinu, jer bi menjanje zahtevalo mnostvo izmena i u mnogim slcajevima, istrazivanja. Zato liku koji je igrao prolece 2018 upisujem (2017–2018) jer je igrao u sezoni 2017/18. Naravno, tu sam i imao fleksibilnost da ne ukljucim celu sezonu igracima koji su recimo igrali samo prve utakmice jedne sezone i onda u toku jos otvorenog prelaznog roka presli u drugi klub, tih par utakmice zadnje sezone nisam naravno upisivao plus jednu godinu samo zato sto je igrao u prve dve utakmice 2017/18 sezone i otisao u toku jos otvorenog letnjeg 2017 prelaznog roka, zakljucivao bih ga sa 2017., naravno ne sa 2018. Ali u ostalim slucajevima sam nastavio sa praksom sezona.

Imam nekako utisak da ako ce mo da menjamo koncept i upisujemo samo godinu polasezone u kojoj je igrao, onda bi to bio veliki posao u kojem bi celoj listi trebalo onda proveriti i uskladiti godine. Ono sto sam ja upisivao su sezone, tako da onima koji su igrali samo polusezonu treba skinuti godinu u kojoj nije igrao. Mozda deluje lako na prvi pogled, ali lista je masivna, treba je znaci celu proveriti a za mnoge igrace iz predhodnih decenija to je nemoguce. Ako hoces, ajde, prihvatam izazov, menjajmo to, ja sam to nekako odlagao jer mi nije delovalo hitno.

Druga stvar vrednu pomena koju sam hteo da ti obrazlozim je ubacivanje Kosova. Stvar je bazicna, posto je ovo en.wiki mene jedino zanima strana svetska percepcija. Ja kako sam odrastao vani u stranom drustvu, cak i imam duplo dravljanstvo pa dodajuci to da sam potpuno uklopljen u kulturu te druge zemlje cije drzavljanstvo posedujem, znam tacno percepciju koju oni imaju. Da uprostim, ja sam cist ponosan srbin, ali kako sam odrastao u stranom drustvu znam tacno da razmisljam iskljucivo kao portugalac, sto je moja druga nacionalnost. Na stranu sto sam ucio i radio uvek u miltinacionalnim ambijentima, zavrsio Spansku srednju pa imam ukoren i spanski mentalitet, itd. Sve druge sem srpske se podudaraju u utisku da ako izostavimo Kosovo jedini zakljucak ogromne vecine ce biti da znaci igraci iz Kosova su igrali u raznoraznim ligama (posto ih ima na listama) a da kod nas znaci NISU. Veruj mi da sve to sto mi mislimo da ceo svet zna tipa parole "Kosovo is Serbia" i memes i sve, to sve pada u zaborav kad neko gleda listu i vidi da Kosovo fali. Nece se maltretirati uopste intelektualno vise od toga sem podsvesnog zakljucka da znaci u Srbiji nije bilo nikada igraca sa Kosova. To krajnje nama ne ide uopste u korist jer mi zelimo da dokazemo nas uticaj i vezanost sa Kosovom, da bi legitimisali nase pravo na njega, a dajuci signal strancima da nije bilo kosovskih igraca u Srbiji (a njih bas ima svigde) samo im daje obrnutu poruku.

Tu je jedan zaista komplikovan politicki cvor, u kojem kad se fudbala tice, mi smo nazalost igubili kad se Kosovo prihvatilo kao clan FIFE i UEFE. Mi smo uvek bili nazalost narod sklon da pisemo i citamo samo ono sto volimo a za realpolitiku smo uvek bili totalna nula. Mogu Zurnal i ostali nasi mediji da pisu koliko hoce "tzv. Kosovo" kad govore o njihovoj reprezentaciji, ligi ili timu, ali conjenica (za svet) je da su oni postali jednak clan kao i svi drugi i to pod imenom "Kosovo", a ne "tkz. Kosovo" ili sta vec... Borba je bila spreciti njihov prijem, a sad kad smo izgubili, ne prihvatajuci odluku samo sami sebi pravimo problem i zavaravamo se. Da tragedija bude manja, nisu sve clanice FIFE i UEFE clanovi UN, to je potpuno apsurdan argument kojeg se nas tim drzao i zbog kojeg su izgubili, jer da su imali iole mozga mogli su da vide na desetine reprezentacija sa svih delova sveta koje nisu nezavosne zemlje niti clanice UN, a imaju reprezentaciju (od Engleske, Farskih ostrva, Gibraltara, Perto Rika, USA Virgin Islands, UK Virgin Islands, Comoros (ciji je Ben koji su deo Francuske), itd. Postoje mnoge reprezentacije cije su teritorije deo druge drzave pa svejedno igraju kao reprezentacija u fudbalu. Nasi iz FSS su toliko glupo se uhvatili samo tog argumenta da su samo pokazali nesposobnost i glupocu i naravno da je odluka doneta protiv nas kad nas toliko glupi ljudi predstavljaju. FIFI i UEFI je dovoljno bilo da obrazloze kosovski specifican politicki status prema kojem oni traze da im se dopusti da igraju fudbal na profesionalnosm i medjunarodnom nivou bez da moraju da cekaju decenijama da se krajnji politicki status resi. Mi nismo imali adekvatan odgovor na to, nismo uspeli da ubedimo, a kamoli dokazemo, FIFU i UEFU da oni mogu da igraju u nasem fudbalskom sistemu bez ikakvih problema.

Nepravedno? Jeste. Da ni oni svi nisu mutavi i da znaju da sport utice i te kako na stvaranje nacionalnog identiteta i jaca separatizam u slucajevima kao ovaj? Kako da ne. Ali ja ne znam sta je FSS i nas pravni tim (valjda ga imaju) sta su radili, sta su argumentovali da ubede druge zemlje da je bolje da ne dozvole Kosovu da nastupa nezavisno vec da je bolje da udju u tokove naseg fudbalskog sistema? Sta su uradili po tom pitanju i da li su dali ijedan argument koji bi mogao da pomogne ovom kljucnom pitanju? Koliko ja znam, NISTA. Oni su se samo drzali toga da Kosovo nema UN priznanje i kao takvo kosovska reprezentacija, liga, treba da budu ignorisane. Izvini, ali to je jasno nas totalni promasaj.

E sad, da mi sami sebi nalazimo utehu u ignorisanju Kosova i spominjanju ga kao "tzv. Kosovo" nesto sto samo mi u Srbiji znamo sta znaci, to je za svet i za en.wiki jedno veliko NISTA. Kosovosko priznanje se nece izbrisati u skorijem vremenu i oni ce se takmiciti sigurno barem u bliskoj buducnosti. Mi mozemo da izbrisemo Kosovo i da se pravimo da kao ne postoje, ali rezultat toga je samo taj da ce prosecan citalac kad vidi liste zakljuciti da kosovski igraci se razvijaju u Albaniji i drugim zemljama, a da u Srbiji ih nema. To nipocemu nece dati nikakvu indikaciju da je Kosovo srpsko, samo naprotiv, udaljice nas, i kad neko bude pitao "Sta, Srbija tvrdi da je Kosovo deo njihove teritorije? Kako to? Pa nijedan igrac sa Kosova uopste tamo nije ni igrao." Mozda ovaj monolog zvuci smesno, ali ljudska psiha mladih u danasnjici zaista tako bazicno funkcionise. Jos doprinosimo njihovom argumentu kako nisu jadni mogli da igraju u nasim ligama (sto je laz). Tako da bolje da okrenemo skroz stranu i pokazemo svetu koliko igraca albanaca sa Kosova je izgradilo karijeru kod nas i igrali bez problema, stavise, ja bi napravio i clanak specificno o igracima sa Kosova i uticaj igranja u srpskim klubovima u njihovim karijerama. Vec sam puno ispisao, necu da ti dosadjujem, ali barem da objasnim neka moja opredeljenja vezana za listu koja sigurno deluju nelogicna na prvi pogled. FkpCascais (talk) 20:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Serbia national football team 2020–29 results, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 13:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 ATP Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lloyd Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:33, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In tennis charts, we don't number losses[edit]

Just a heads up since I noticed your edit at Novak Djokovic career statistics, we never number a players losses in charts... only wins. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiAviator (talk) 03:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Nightfall87! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiAviator (talk) 03:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With the links, please keep adding them if it suits you. Could you carry on working up from the bottom and I'll do a few more working down from the top, and if we save and check after each country or two, hopefully we will meet in the middle without going over each others edits, and it will be all finished quite soon. B-) Crowsus (talk) 20:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Crowsus: that should be it, good job :) Nightfall87 (talk) 21:09, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wow great stuff! Crowsus (talk) 21:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

FK Napredak Kruševac
added a link pointing to Miloš Ostojić
FK Proleter Novi Sad
added a link pointing to Marko Janković

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Star Belgrade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Young Boys.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sakiv. I noticed that you recently removed content from Serbia national football team results (2020–29) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sakiv (talk) 13:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sakiv: You are probably thinking about disciplinary actions history that I removed from latest Serbia vs Turkey fixture? If that's so I removed them because they were never shown on any of results summary pages for previous decades (as you can see here, here and here). So in order to keep them consistent I removed them from this fixture. Nightfall87 (talk) 13:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your point of view, but the template is dedicated to this particular thing, and we have to give the reader every piece of information that's useful. The lack of such information in the past does not prevent us from using it at this time. Thanks--Sakiv (talk) 16:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sakiv: It's not that this data is no longer available for older fixtures, I'm more on the side of argument that data about yellow and red card is not relevant to this kind of templates. Even paramethers that you used to display them are called goals1 and goals2. Or if we use FIFA World Cup as an example you can see that on the pages where this template is used cards are not being shown (here), while on pages where additional info about games are being shown different template was used to display them (for example here). Again, I don't say either including or removing them is right or wrong. I'm just conserned about consistency wherever this template is being used. If you want you could start discussion about this on template talk page. Nightfall87 (talk) 20:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Red Star Belgrade season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Kavanagh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:10, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ibrahim Mustapha (Ghanaian footballer)[edit]

Hello, Nightfall87,

Thank you for creating Ibrahim Mustapha (Ghanaian footballer).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Wrong Soccerway profile.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Usedtobecool}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Usedtobecool: Ooops, missed that. Thanks for the catch, links to both Soccerway and FootballDatabase fixed. Nightfall87 (talk) 08:29, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers! Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nightfall87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Serbia national football team 2020–29 results".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 03:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nasilno odvajanje SCG i Srbija statistike[edit]

Pozdrav, voleo bih da pogledaš ovo, šta su smislili da odvoje statistike za timove, to je unikum, neviđeno - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Serbia_%28and_Montenegro%29_in_the_infobox%2C_again - Nikgudz 14:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recoveries[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you used to update this chart. I'm not really sure if the number of recoveries is supposed to be included in that chart. I had been following how the chart was updated by other people, and it appears that those numbers are not included in the dashboard. Now, an IP has been editing the template several times lately and is attempting to wrest out the template. I noticed that the IP removed several of those numbers. Would you know if there is any truth to this? Between July and September, other people also included the number of recoveries whenever they updated the template. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 02:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red Star Belgrade in European football[edit]

Izvini ali neki izgleda Hrvat 91.191.37.22 je unistio ovu gore stranicu u naslovu "Red Star Belgrade in European football" i sve izmenjao. Nema vise ni one trake srebrne za finala i zlatne za osvojen trofej. Svaka cast za posao koji nije lako odraditi. Pohvala. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoKralj (talkcontribs) 17:13, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red Star Belgrade[edit]

Zvezda je upravo osvojila 59 domaci trofej i 32 titulu prvaka a ne 58 i 31. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoKralj (talkcontribs) 19:16, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Honours" section counts[edit]

Hi there. Per consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football we should only include counts for honours in the "Honours" section if the sum is more than 5. I've removed the count ("2") at Aleksandar Katai. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 07:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion[edit]

Please check this out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Serbia FIBA Basketball World Cup team and make your contribution. -- IndexAccount (talk) 14:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Svaka cast kako drzis stranicu nase reprezentacije i svih reprezentativaca up-to-date, i cak i za vreme trajanja utakmice azuriras podatke. Sve najbolje :) Gagibgd (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help[edit]

Hello, can you help with editing on this page, I wanted to post collapsible list of women volleyball team and also the same for waterpolo team, but ran on some problems. [[1]], Thank you. Theonewithreason (talk) 8 August 2021 (UTC

It was done by one IP, but still thank you. Theonewithreason (talk) 8 August 2021 (UTC

Categories[edit]

Hey, when a Serbian player has won a medal in water polo and there is a specific category saying "Olympic (medal) medalists for Serbia in water polo", then he does not need to be in the wider "Olympic water polo players of Serbia" as the former is a subcat of the second one. Kante4 (talk) 16:39, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Live updates[edit]

Information icon Please be aware that live updates—meaning an update to a player's stats while the match is still going on—only serve to confuse, especially if that player is in a position to score a goal, as is very much the case with Aleksandar Mitrović. As such, these kinds of updates should be avoided unless the player has been subbed out, and thus their match has ended. Thank you. Anwegmann (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Please stop making live updates to players attached to the Serbia national football team. I have explained why this is disruptive above, but you have continued to make such updates after I left a note. All live updates will be reverted until the match has ended. Anwegmann (talk) 20:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Nightfall87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:KK Crvena zvezda in EuroLeague, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nikola Knežević (footballer, born 2003)[edit]

Hello, Nightfall87,

Thank you for creating Nikola Knežević (footballer, born 2003).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve David Petrović[edit]

Hello, Nightfall87,

Thank you for creating David Petrović.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nightfall87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "KK Crvena zvezda in EuroLeague".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 20:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help with a template is needed[edit]

Hello, there. I need assistance with an article, especially in the json format department. If you are adept in this area, please, do help. Because I have been spending countless speepless nights attempting to edit a template, but cannot seem to wrap my head around the template data. Template in question looks pretty simple, but to mere mortals, like myself, it is unclear what is what. Care to help? Best, Qwerty284651 (talk) 02:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
Nightfall87
[[{{{1}}} {{{2}}}|{{{1}}} {{{2}}}]]
Events
Singles [[ {{{1}}} {{{2}}} – Men's singles|men]] [[ {{{1}}} {{{2}}} – Women's singles|women]]
Doubles [[ {{{1}}} {{{2}}} – Men's doubles|men]] [[ {{{1}}} {{{2}}} – Women's doubles|women]]
← [[2023 {{{2}}} |2023]] · [[ {{{2}}}|{{{2}}}]] · [[2025 {{{2}}} |2025]] →

Qwerty284651 (talk) 02:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The greatest success since 1992[edit]

Why is the placement among the 32 best teams in the Europa League is a greater success than the placement among the 16 teams in the UEFA Cup Winners' Cup? I think that if Zvezda biggest successes after 1992 are the group stage of the Champions League and the knockout phase among 32 teams in the Europa League, it must also be in the round of 16 of the Cup Winners' Cup 1996/97. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VucoCar (talkcontribs) 13:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Top ten male doubles tennis players templates[edit]

A number of "Top ten male doubles tennis players" templates, at least one of which you created, have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Top ten male doubles tennis players templates. Nigej (talk) 08:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Marko Ivezić[edit]

Hello, Nightfall87,

Thank you for creating Marko Ivezić.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

More references about this player are needed.
What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:14, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Viktor Rogan[edit]

Hello, Nightfall87,

Thank you for creating Viktor Rogan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

More rerferences are needed about this player.
What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:15, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Nightfall87

Thank you for creating Serbia at the 2022 World Aquatics Championships.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KK CZ[edit]

Template:KK Crvena zvezda sidebar has been nominated for deletion. Could you comment on the discussion. -- DragonFederal (talk) 13:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Obradović moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Stefan Obradović, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Luka Bijelović moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Luka Bijelović, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 11:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nikola Petković (footballer, born 2003), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 11:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Filip Damjanović moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Filip Damjanović, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 11:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm wondering if the article would pass WP:GNG? Pelmeen10 (talk) 14:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Hello Nightfall87!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stefan Obradović[edit]

Hello, Nightfall87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stefan Obradović".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 14:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Filip Damjanović[edit]

Hello, Nightfall87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Filip Damjanović".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 14:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Luka Bijelović[edit]

Hello, Nightfall87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Luka Bijelović".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 14:23, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Serbia national under-19 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kula.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about 2023 Smederevo explosion[edit]

Hello Nightfall87, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, 2023 Smederevo explosion, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Smederevo explosion.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate. Thanks for the heads-up. I honestly forgot to update this article, it was not explosion of fuel tank as it was initially suspected. Instead it was a explosive attack, landlord activated few KGs of explosives in an attempt to kill tennents that he was unable to vacate from his appartment for a few years. Blowing himself in process, severly injuring two of them and causing severe damage to the entire building. If I rework the article and add these changes would that affect it's notability? Nightfall87 (talk) 23:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]