User talk:NMDP

Content in Lead[edit]

Content in Lead (names of people he toured with) needs to be expanded upon - and referenced - in the body of the article. David notMD (talk) 09:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I get it--I need to do a sub-head for each point in the lead. Thank you for commenting. NMDP (talk) 14:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In Touring, I converted the red Wikilinks to blue by moving the italics marks to outside the double brackets [[ ]]. However, a question - do you mean to indicate that Erik is credited as personnel on those albums? Because when looking at the articles on each album, he is not listed as a performer on all of them. If you meant specifically that he was touring with her from 1998 to whenever, then the albums should not be listed and instead what is needed is a reference describing him as touring with her. David notMD (talk) 20:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree. I only linked to the wiki pages of each album because they are available. I am also looking for credible external links that show him on tour for each one, but that has been difficult so far. If it is in fact impossible, I will change this section to just the general statement that he toured with her for many years with a credible reference showing that. Thank you for fixing the links. NMDP (talk) 21:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Della Penna (April 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not yet ready; another editor is discussing matters with the contributor. See also my edit summaries.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erik Della Penna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 21:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking at the article and for your comments. I didn't expect it to be reviewed so quickly, so I was in the middle of making changes with another editor when you viewed it! I will endeavor to resolve all the issues you have pointed out. NMDP (talk) 14:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NMDP! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drmies (talk) 21:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, NMDP. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Della Penna (April 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChineseGroundnut was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

He's notable but sources with significant coverage are needed. Most sources here are either primary or just passing mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erik Della Penna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

@T.C.G. [talk] 21:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments and for pointing out the "sources" links. They were very helpful. NMDP (talk) 21:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Erik Della Penna has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Erik Della Penna. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]