User talk:Lee Vilenski/Archives/2019/September
Your GA nomination of WrestleMania IV[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article WrestleMania IV you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:WrestleMania IV for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 02:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Lee Vilenski, thank you for all the DYK reviewing you have been doing of late. One request: please be sure to use "subst:" when adding any review icons to the nomination template. I already substituted the icon on your review of Template:Did you know nominations/2019 CONCACAF Gold Cup Final, but figured it would save time to let you know now.
The reason this is important is that the bot that moves approved nominations from the Nominations page to the Approved page doesn't recognize the unsubstituted icon templates as approvals (or whatever status they are), so none of the prep builders will know that the nomination is approved. Come to think of it, the same is true for the bot that builds the Count of DYK Hooks table that appears on both of those pages, so neither know that those nominations are approved.
I'll leave this nomination (and any I haven't run into) for you to complete the approval process by adding the "subst:"; what I do, when I add an icon to a nomination, is copy and paste the icon template from the area explaining the available icons above the editing window—those have the "subst:" already there inside the braces (i.e., {{subst:DYKtick}}), and it saves me some typing (and typoing), too. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:32, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hi BlueMoonset, I did know, but I totally forgot! Thanks for reminding me. I'll make the changes. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 06:32, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 World Snooker Championship[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article 2019 World Snooker Championship you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:2019 World Snooker Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 07:41, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Oliver Ortmann[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article Oliver Ortmann you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Oliver Ortmann for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 WPA World Ten-ball Championship[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 WPA World Ten-ball Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:41, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Kristina Tkach[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kristina Tkach you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of WrestleMania IV[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article WrestleMania IV you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WrestleMania IV for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 14:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Kristina Tkach[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article Kristina Tkach you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kristina Tkach for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)[edit]
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:34, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 4[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Paul Hunter Classic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Charles Faroux[edit]
On 4 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charles Faroux, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that motorsport official Charles Faroux was also a three-time French carom billiards world champion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Faroux. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Charles Faroux), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 September newsletter[edit]
The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.
As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Kristina Tkach[edit]
On 5 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kristina Tkach, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Waterford Crystal trophy, won by Russian pool player Kristina Tkach at the Women's Pro Players Championship, shattered when it was dropped as it was being carried out of the arena? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kristina Tkach. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kristina Tkach), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Lee, thank you for reviewing this article. Actually I don't remember nominating it for a GA! However, it is a shame that the review was carried out so quickly as I could have answered many of the questions and, if necessary, made improvements. Is it still worth me doing that? It would be better for me to do that towards the end of the month when I have more time. I'd be interested in doing so as I've never run an article for GA and it would be a good learning curve. Bermicourt (talk) 12:43, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Bermicourt, I hope you are well! Yeah, I was a little confused, as I couldn't find any other nominations you had done in the past. Definately use the information provided on this and improve the article. Sadly, I feel as though the article would need to be significantly rewritten to pass a GA, more than just the regular updates through the GA process. Feel free to take your time, and re-nominate the article (drop me a ping, and I'll take a look.) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:07, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Mandy Fisher[edit]
On 6 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mandy Fisher, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that snooker player Mandy Fisher played whilst pregnant, but lamented that this was more newsworthy than female players' skill? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mandy Fisher. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mandy Fisher), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee (talk) 12:02, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK for 2019 Riga Masters[edit]
On 7 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2019 Riga Masters, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2019 Riga Masters. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2019 Riga Masters), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 14:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Montenegrin language[edit]
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Montenegrin language. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Hey, as a followup to this discussion, the article Ding Junhui has been copy edited by the GOCE. There is some feedback I've gotten on my talk page, which I will resolve when I get free time. I've nominated it for GA, so if you could review it (given your expertise in snooker), that would be great. Bobbychan193 (talk) 02:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- I have added it to my to-do list. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:47, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sounds good, thanks. Take your time too. Bobbychan193 (talk) 18:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Veronika Ivanovskaia[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Veronika Ivanovskaia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of David Alcaide[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article David Alcaide you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
request for help with DYK[edit]
can you please help me with my DYK nomination? it is under September 8th. thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 01:09, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- never mind, it has been fixed. --Sm8900 (talk) 01:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sm8900 is this the Template:Did you know nominations/Sulfur-breathing organisms nom? It is both a stub and too short (minimum is 1,500 bytes) to be nominated. It's currently at under 500, so would need to be expanded 3x in the next eight days to be valid. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- never mind, it has been fixed. --Sm8900 (talk) 01:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of David Alcaide[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article David Alcaide you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:David Alcaide for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
You mentioned on Discord: "Looking at Karuka, it's got a really weak lead summary, which is an instant issue for me." Could you explain further? Leads need a summary? --Nessie (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Leads are a summary. They shouldn't need citations, as they are a summary of the information in the rest of the article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2016 World Snooker Championship[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2016 World Snooker Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Kristina Tkach[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article Kristina Tkach you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kristina Tkach for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:21, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Oliver Ortmann[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article Oliver Ortmann you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oliver Ortmann for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 WPA World Ten-ball Championship[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article 2019 WPA World Ten-ball Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2019 WPA World Ten-ball Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:42, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 11[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1985 World Snooker Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Veronika Ivanovskaia[edit]
On 11 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Veronika Ivanovskaia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when learning to play pool, Veronika Ivanovskaia stood on a crate of Coca-Cola? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Veronika Ivanovskaia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Veronika Ivanovskaia), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee (talk) 12:02, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019[edit]
Hello Lee Vilenski/Archives/2019,
- Backlog
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
- Coordinator
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
- This month's refresher course
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
- Deletion tags
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
- Paid editing
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
- Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
- Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
- Not English
- A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
- Tools
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.
Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.
DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film[edit]
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Marcus Chamat[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marcus Chamat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Marcus Chamat[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article Marcus Chamat you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marcus Chamat for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Marcus Chamat[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article Marcus Chamat you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marcus Chamat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Flagicon[edit]
Hi, re your revert on 2019 Six-red World Championship, can you point out to me where in MOS:FLAG it states flagathlete should be used instead of flagicon? Apologies, I can't seem to find it and wasn't aware there had been a change. Andygray110 (talk) 20:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Andygray110! I hope you are well. It has been a big issue recently, it's an issue with both the MOS:FLAG and WP:ACCESS. It has been pointed out in a few discussions that the first viewing of a flag needs more than just a visual representation (thus flagathlete).
- the best conversation to read would be at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2018 World Snooker Championship/archive1 which failed due to these flag issues. Elsewhere, WT:SNOOKER has had some commentary of ghe situation. For much the same reason, we no longer have flags for century breaks, as they are purely decorative, and break MOS:FLAG. I hope thats enough info! happy wiki'ing Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Having read that article I note that it doesn't mention any consensus for flagathlete, nor that the use of flagathlete is explicitly mentioned in MOS:FLAG, hence my surprise at the summary reason for the revert. However I do see in the discussion the issue with flagicon, and the solution you came up with seems a good one. The issue now is that the infoboxes of the new tournaments differ markedly from past tournaments (as they are still using the flagicon template). Is it on your radar to adjust the old tournaments? I can try and lend a hand if so. Andygray110 (talk) 21:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Andygray110 It is on my to-do list; but I am super deep into content creation for the Wikicup final round. Realistically, I need to update the MOS for this, but I suspect I'd need a new consensus and wording to do so, and I simply do not have the time to do it.
- if there is a better way to do this, I am all ears, however, we should follow our featured content and MOS. If you would be willing to do some updating for this, I would be greatful. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sounds good, if I have the time I'll give it a go. Good luck in the cup! Andygray110 (talk) 21:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Who are you?[edit]
To think that you can decide what the content of my talk page is supposed to be? You also want to come and decide which furniture I should have at my home? --Sb008 (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Well, clearly the conversation you was having was regarding information that had already had a consensus at FOOTY, so I would have thought you would have wanted to follow this and gain a new consensus. If you weren't looking to do this, the conversation is moot. I'll leave it alone, as it's clear you do not want to gain any consensus on this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- You can copy things from my talk page, you can link to items on my talk page, but you do not delete things from my talk page unless it's one of you own contribution or you consulted me on the matter. How would you like it if I would come and organize your talk page to my liking?
- You claim there's a consensus, in other words there is a standard for league pages. Does this mean you're refering to this? If so, let's have at the first sentence on the page "This page is part of the WikiProject on Football and is a proposal for the general style and contents of an article on a league season.". Proposal indicates it has no real status. Furthermore, even if it would be a standard, let's look at the most relevant statement in the stats section "The inclusion of this section is not decided yet". That line actually says there's no consensus on stats data. Frankly I would define the whole page as immature and incomplete.
- Or is this supposed to be the consensus? A quick exchange of unmotived opinions by a select few within a time period of less than 48 hours. You yourself call it WP:FANCRUFT. From my earlier posts you can see that 3 major sites consider this kind of data relevant enough to include in the standings table. To get an idea of how well my team will do in their next match, I'm more interested on how the oppononent is ranked and how well they performed in the last few matches, than who is their kit manufacturer. If according the proposal for the general style and contents of an article on a league season, the kit manufacturar is cnsidered important relevant imformation which is of interest not only to a small population of enthusiastic fans, but to the general public, there isn't much left which possibly could qualify as WP:FANCRUFT. Maybe you should consider listing the tattoo artist of players as well.
- As far as I'm consider the module Module:Sports rbr table represents far more a standard than an immature proposal or unmotived opinions of a select few. In general the purpose of templates and modules is to simplify common practices.
- You can join HawkAussie in the mission to get the module Module:Sports rbr table removed. Information "we" don't want on pages, should surely not be facilitated by modules to do so in an easy way.
- --Sb008 (talk) 09:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I upset you - the information has been returned to your talk page by your own undo, and I won't touch your page again. The additions for general round-by-round table for a league this size, is in my opinion, a ridiculous addition of stat-cruft. I think that the information should be discussed at FOOTY, as this is where we would get the best input, and where the conversation should be; and it would be wise to add your own opinions as above there. However, if you would like to raise these points at that destination, I would be obliged, as my talk page is not a suitable venue for this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- If you had put the part "The additions for general ....... at that destination" on my talk page with the addition "so I'll copy this discussion to the FOOTY page, it had been perfectly fine with. I don't mind the discussion being moved there, I mind you deleting stuff on my talk page. And on that kind of behavior I address you on your talk page and not on FOOTY. Furthermore, if you clain in your response there's an existing consensus, I dispute that claim over here. I only came here to address you on your behavior regarding my talk page, not to discuss the results table. You connected the two issues by using a consensus on that issue as defence for your behavior. --Sb008 (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I upset you - the information has been returned to your talk page by your own undo, and I won't touch your page again. The additions for general round-by-round table for a league this size, is in my opinion, a ridiculous addition of stat-cruft. I think that the information should be discussed at FOOTY, as this is where we would get the best input, and where the conversation should be; and it would be wise to add your own opinions as above there. However, if you would like to raise these points at that destination, I would be obliged, as my talk page is not a suitable venue for this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 Riga Masters[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 Riga Masters you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:42, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship[edit]
Hello! Your submission of 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:TERF. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK for 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship[edit]
On 17 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the final of the 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship was the longest ever recorded best-of-11-frames match, lasting over eight hours of playing time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2017 World Women's Snooker Championship. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Daryl Peach[edit]
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Daryl Peach has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your excellent work as always, Twofingered Typist! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- You're most welcome! Cheers, Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:34, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorsport[edit]
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorsport. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 18[edit]
| Done |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of 2019 International Championship (snooker)[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 International Championship (snooker) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 Six-red World Championship[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 Six-red World Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
1984 World Snooker Championship[edit]
Hi again. I've added to 1984 World Snooker Championship - hopefully mainly good stuff. It would probably benefit from a once-over from you. I do have a bit more (or lot more for later stages) info on particular matches from another old copy of Snooker Scene, so might add some more later. Thanks!BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sadly, I'm beyond behind with the wikistuff right now, but I will get to it! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2016 World Snooker Championship[edit]
The article 2016 World Snooker Championship you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2016 World Snooker Championship for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Daryl Peach[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Daryl Peach at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK for 1985 World Snooker Championship[edit]
On 21 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1985 World Snooker Championship, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1985 World Snooker Championship. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1985 World Snooker Championship), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde (Talk) 00:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
2016 World Snooker Championship[edit]
Hey there. I see you withdrew the 2016 World Snooker Championship GA review. Did I overanalyze something in the review? Please let me know for future reviews. Thanks for all your work! :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:30, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Not really MrLinkinPark333, it's up to you to make sure you are happy with the article before passing or failing. I simply withdrew as I wasn't happy with it, and I'll probably do a full on re-write at some point to fix the issues. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Ah okay. No worries then @Lee Vilenski:. For me, the longer the article, the longer the review. But since you are not happy with the article currently, you now can decide when and how long you want to work on the article. :) Feel free to renominate it whenever you are happy and feel like it. I didn't get a chance to finish the recap of what's left, but hopefully you can get a gist of what's left. Thank you for the frequent comments and edits. *thumbs up* --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:CESNUR[edit]
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:CESNUR. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 Riga Masters[edit]
The article 2019 Riga Masters you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2019 Riga Masters for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Daryl Peach[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daryl Peach you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobbychan193 -- Bobbychan193 (talk) 19:21, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Daryl Peach[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article Daryl Peach you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Daryl Peach for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobbychan193 -- Bobbychan193 (talk) 08:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ina Kaplan[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ina Kaplan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 08:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thanks![edit]
Thanks for fixing! Was I adding a blank space that caused a line break? --valereee (talk) 19:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Valereee, I only just noticed you'd posted on the talk page. Yeah, having a line break between # will make it reset it's numbering. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 Veldhoven Open[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 Veldhoven Open you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Kenny Omega – GA[edit]
Hi there, Lee Vilenski! Back in February, you reviewed the Kenny Omega article for GA. While it didn't pass, I have renominated it because I feel that there have been significant improvements made to the article since the last review. I wanted to notify you of this in case you are interested in re-reviewing the article for GA. Cheers! KyleJoantalk 03:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- I would need to check that it was suitable (I actually have no idea what the rules are around re-reviewing GAs.) I'll post something at WT:GAN Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:04, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK for 2018 Women's World Snooker Championship[edit]
On 26 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2018 Women's World Snooker Championship, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ng On-yee won the 2018 Women's World Snooker Championship without losing a single frame in all six of her tournament matches? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2018 Women's World Snooker Championship. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2018 Women's World Snooker Championship), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)[edit]
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Well done on getting the 2019 Tour Championship to Featured Article status. HawkAussie (talk) 05:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC) |
- Hey, thanks HawkAussie! Seems to be going pretty well now. Hopefully many more to come. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 06:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 Six-red World Championship[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article 2019 Six-red World Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2019 Six-red World Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of largest hospitals[edit]
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of largest hospitals. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2019[edit]
- From the editors: Where do we go from here?
- Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
- Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads
- News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green
- Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?