User talk:Johan5885

June 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Egypt’s Islamic Cultural Center—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 14:15, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Egypt’s Islamic Cultural Center, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Grachester (talk) 17:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of tallest buildings in Saudi Arabia, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Hi Johan5885! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Like here [1] where you just changed the square metres from 65,000 to 241,000 without any explanation, and contradicting what the given source said.

Please add an edit summary with your edits, to explain why you are making changes. Your edits have been reverted because it was not clear to other editors that they were an improvement. For instance, when somebody reviews your edit here [2], it's natural to revert it, because you just removed one of the buildings without any explanation. I happened to notice that one of the data items said "Cancelled". It would have helped if you had left an edit summary saying "construction cancelled" or something like that. Thanks. _signed,Willondon (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Capital Sports Hall moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to New Capital Sports Hall. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Capital Sports Hall (January 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at New Capital Sports Hall instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Capital Sports Hall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johan5885! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into New Capital Sports Hall. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me that and no i didn't do that before, this was the first time. Johan5885 (talk) 21:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johan5885! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Men's World Team Squash Championships moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to 2023 Men's World Team Squash Championships. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Needs more sources???😂 i put the official website of the WSF, there's no stronger/more verified source that can be put Johan5885 (talk) 04:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Capital Sports Hall for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Capital Sports Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Capital Sports Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 07:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]