User talk:IreneLouie
Welcome!
|
Argentinosaurus[edit]
Hi IreneTandry, there are many differences between Argentinosaurs and Apatosaurus though many of them require looking closely at the shapes of bones, like different shaped vertebrae. Looking at the life appearance of these dinosaurs, the biggest differences would be: Argentinosaurs had longer legs than Apatosaurus and the front legs were as long as the back legs; in Apatosaurus the back legs were much longer. The tail of Apatosaurus was much longer than the tail of Argentinosaurs, and it ended in a whiplash. American Film Institute Awards 2016 The neck of Apatosaurus was much thicker but the neck of Argentinosaurs was longer. Apatosaurus had one claw on the front feet while Argentinosaurs had no claws on the front feet. Take a look at the different body outlines to see general differences in their shapes. Hope this helps! Dinoguy2 (talk) 15:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Your nice edits at Accolades for The Revenant[edit]
Your nice edits at the page for Accolades for The Revenant suggested you might be a good person to ask about the short Accolades section at the film's main page. Could you take a look at it when and if time allows for possible updates at The Revenant (2015 film). Cheers. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 18:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
The Conjuring 2[edit]
Hello Irene. I'm new to Wikipedia, as a contributor. I've just edited the page of The Conjuring 2, inserting an aspect about symbolism, with a reference from the website Geoffreview (who I've contacted on Facebook, their saying it's okay for me to reference their review). Would you mind just checking the page, and confirming that everything's okay with the edits? Thanks. Thomas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marieltrokan (talk • contribs) 15:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, IreneTandry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Sing Street[edit]
I've left that editor a polite message. And may I say that I, for one, appreciate your hard work and diligence on the film articles. I'm sure I speak for many of our fellow editors when I say how good it is to have another mature and responsible editor in WP:FILM. Thank you! --Tenebrae (talk) 15:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Film awards[edit]
Hi Irene. I saw that you were blocked following a recent ANI discussion. I've seen your edits for film awards crop up on my watchlist and they always look good, so it's a shame to see an editor in that subject area gone from the project. I'm not supporting your actions that lead to your block, but if you do feel like requesting an unblock, then please do. I've wanted to tell many editors how I feel, but in the main, I've held back. It's tough to hold it in sometimes, but if you want to continue your good work, then please think about it and forming a well thought-out apology. Thanks. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 08:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Lugnuts: I just protect that film awards from the worse users. Tenebrae said that to me, so I try to follow the rule. No, I won't come back. I won't say "sorry" to them. If they're smart, do it, block my user talk page. For EEng, you said I'm childish and yes, I still "the kid" who follow the rule.... So, don't call me to this Wikipedia or send any messages to this user page again. I work and edit at "the neighbor" Wikipedia. I want to "clean this user talk page" because they make my user talk page dirty.
- @Linguist111: Go ahead and revoke my user talk page access. I won't come back to this Wikipedia. (Personal attack removed). Then, make this user talk page empty.
IreneTandry (talk) 12:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Talk page access revoked[edit]
I honestly did not want to do this IreneTandry - I gave you clear advice and asked you to stop. I understand you're feeling frustrated, but taking it out directly on other users is not the way to deal with it - calm down, and if you feel like you're going to be able to discuss things in a civil manner please email me and I will give you talk page access back -- Samtar talk · contribs 13:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
IreneLouie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #18003 was submitted on Apr 11, 2017 13:53:22. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 13:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
IreneLouie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #18009 was submitted on Apr 12, 2017 02:10:54. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 02:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
quack quack[edit]
This user has been evading this block basically the entire time, including while they had open UTRS requests. See User:HenleeDiscette's contribs. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)