User talk:Hugo999/Archive 12
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North Auckland Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Khandallah have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Kirbanzo (talk) 04:11, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Well the history section was moved to the end (as for Ngaio, New Zealand) to emphasize the current descriptions section of the article before I add to the history part. Hugo999 (talk) 04:31, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:19th-century Brazilian singers
A tag has been placed on Category:19th-century Brazilian singers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
- updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
De Clisson not French
Adding to a list of French ladies confuses her heritage. She was Breton, a independent country at that stage. This like equating a 6th century Welshman as English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.113.172.181 (talk) 18:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Request
Hello. Help improve the article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you very much.171.248.63.149 (talk) 10:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Zaida Ben-Yusuf
She had an Algerian father, but it's questionable whether she was simply "Algerian". AnonMoos (talk) 03:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Well she was already categorised as an "Algerian artist" and "Algerian woman artist" so I added the 19c & 20c Algerian artist categories. Hugo999 (talk) 04:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Athletics(sport) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Athletics(sport). Since you had some involvement with the Athletics(sport) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Christian75 (talk) 17:44, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Women are people
Hi! I've noticed that you've been adding categories to a large number of articles. Please make sure that you do not add articles to wrong categories (eg. Elizabeth of Bosnia was not a Polish woman in any sense). Also, please bear in mind that parent categories should not be included, so having an article in both Category:14th-century Hungarian women and Category:14th-century Hungarian people is not a good practice. Surtsicna (talk) 10:45, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Elizabeth of Bosnia was a queen consort of Poland (as it says in her first para). Like many noble and royal women many were doubtless married for reasons of alliance so I think she counts as Polish! Like Prince Albert who became Queen Victoria's royal consort. quite a few women get double listings say as German princesses and Polish princesses. And if you look at any of the "women" subcategories (eg Category:19th-century American women writers or Category:19th-century Polish women) they are described in the label as "Non-diffusing". Hence as it says a Polish 19th century women writer could be in the 19c Polish women writers category and the 19c Polish writers category. "Non-diffusing" is a standard arrangement to avoid "ghettoisation" of women into their own category and also the need to search two categories of (say) 19c Polish writers or poets and 19c Polish women writers.Hugo999 (talk) 11:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Potter (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bert Potter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Category:18th-century Belgian artists has been nominated for discussion
Category:18th-century Belgian artists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fram (talk) 13:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Category:6th-century Belgian people has been nominated for discussion
Category:6th-century Belgian people, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for adding the time category of women ("16th-century women" and so forth) to articles! Just a note: If an article already have "Category:16th-century French women writers", there is no need for "Category:16th-century French women", because 16th-century French women writers where 16th-century French women to. So remember not to double categorize articles. And - articles in the women-category should still have the people category, because women are people too and there are not men-category. Cheers!--Aciram (talk) 20:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC) Well women by century are "double-categorised" because the "women" categories are non-diffusing. this means that women are also included the main category so are not "ghettoized" Hugo999 (talk) 08:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Samuel Fitzherbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Buckley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Category:Clothing companies established in the 2nd millennium has been nominated for discussion
Category:Clothing companies established in the 2nd millennium, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:11, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Category:Telecommunications companies established in the 2nd millennium has been nominated for discussion
Category:Telecommunications companies established in the 2nd millennium, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nick Leggett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnsonville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Just curious
This is against the definition of short film. What is your reason? I mean why? Harsh Rathod Poke me! 06:18, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- I replaced the classification of "short film" with the more precise "2000s animated short films" and "Indian animated short films". Parent categories like Category:Short films should be "container" categories only. Hugo999 (talk) 09:48, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
Have your say!
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/To-do list
Hi Hugo999! It is a pleasure to meet you! The page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/To-do list has been recently updated with a much needed cleanup! I appreciate all of the work you have been doing on Catholic-related efforts on Wikipedia! If possible, feel free to browse and see some of the new changes going on within the portal! Twillisjr (talk) 18:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
We3ll I may have done one or two amendments to some pages, but Catholicism is not one of my main areas (eg railways, New Zealand politicians or sport by year). Hugo999 (talk) 22:14, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1314 in the Mongol Empire
A tag has been placed on Category:1314 in the Mongol Empire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 05:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Category:Historic hotels in the United States has been nominated for discussion
Category:Historic hotels in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:20, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Education schools in New Zealand has been nominated for discussion
Category:Education schools in New Zealand, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Hugo999. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Water transport timelines has been nominated for discussion
Category:Water transport timelines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:59, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Indonesian supercentenarians
A tag has been placed on Category:Indonesian supercentenarians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 06:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
By-election article names
There seems to have been an RfC to change the ordering of by-election names, which Hutt by-election, 1879 and others of your is not following. Comparare, for instance, with the naming seen at Category:By-elections in New Zealand. Not sure where the RfC lives. --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:58, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well I was using the existing redlinks on electorate pages or on the list of NZ by-elections to create the articles , but will make sure they all are "1878 XXXX by-election" with year first to follow WP:NCGAL (The titles in the template still use XXXX 1878 … ) Though most templates do not, see Category:New Zealand by-election result templates Hugo999 (talk) 19:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1855 in Alabama
A tag has been placed on Category:1855 in Alabama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Home Lander (talk) 01:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Well it now has (renamed) content of 1855 Alabama elections Hugo999 (talk) 02:54, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
I think you may have forgotten the results table! Number 57 22:27, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- No, given time (it may come down the chimney!) Hugo999 (talk) 22:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well done except that the reference gets the reference newspaper from Papers Past OK, but does not display it correctly. Why? To do with it thinking there is a space in the URL? Hugo999 (talk) 22:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- I replaced the space in the url with "%20" and it now works. See percent encoding if you haven't seen such a substitution before.-gadfium 03:28, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well it doesn't seem to work with 1901 Northern Maori by-election though Hugo999 (talk) 04:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Look at the diff of my edit to Template:1901_Northern_Maori_by-election. I changed "query=Northern Maori Election" to "query=Northern%20Maori%20Election".-gadfium 05:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Xmas
Category:Ruined churches in Izmir has been nominated for discussion
Category:Ruined churches in Izmir, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1872 Egmont by-election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Stafford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve 1867 City of Christchurch by-election
Hello, Hugo999,
Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating 1867 City of Christchurch by-election! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Are you able to help fix the refs? Thanks for creating this.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 09:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve 1867 Town of New Plymouth by-election
Hello, Hugo999,
Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating 1867 Town of New Plymouth by-election! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Please add your references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 11:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve 1869 Town of New Plymouth by-election
Hello, Hugo999,
Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating 1869 Town of New Plymouth by-election! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Please add your references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 11:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve 1864 Town of New Plymouth by-election
Hello, Hugo999,
Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating 1864 Town of New Plymouth by-election! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Please add your references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 11:09, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Re Articles @Boleyn: ==
I have created the 5 articles in a batch and am adding references, if you can hold your horses! Hugo999 (talk) 11:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
New Zealand by-elections, 19c
Re 1862 City of Dunedin by-elections it is now finished (but still a stub) as have worked out that there was no March poll for Dick & Richardson: Called for after a show of hands on Tuesday 18 March (ODT 18 March, OW 22 March) but then scrubbed Wednesday 19 March as Richardson’s nominator was not on the local roll. And Dick had resigned as he did not want to go to the session in Auckland. NB: the OW 22 March article did not have what happened on the 19th when the poll was scrubbed (a local paper but not up to date!). By combining two or three by-elections in one year into one article, it simplifies checking by-election templates (two separate types of template) and articles which can have a redirect to the one article if necessary. Some distinguished the two in one year with “April 1862” and ”July 1862” in the title, some has (1st) and(2nd), but they can all be given a redirect to the one article. And there are sometimes both “City of Dunedin by-election” and “Dunedin by-election”. NB: never thought of removing the last part (after ?) from Papers Past URLs. Hugo999 (talk) 11:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Newspaper refs
I'm sure you have a ref template somewhere that you copy from by-election to by-election article or results template. Could you please do me a favour and change two things in that template?
- It should be "cite news" instead of "cite web".
- Please replace the parameter "publisher" with "work".
The former is because that's the correct template to use for newspaper citations. The latter achieves that the name of the newspaper is displayed in italics, as it should be. Any questions please don't hesitate to ask. And keep up your good work; at the current rate the red links will be gone some time in February, I reckon. Schwede66 07:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Will note those thanks, tho may have something else to do this (and next) week! Hugo999 (talk) 08:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
1867 Avon by-election
Hey, Hugo. The Article that I Created just now is plain boring. I tried to find the voting numbers for election, but I could not find it, would it be lovely if you find the numbers on the election? Thanks! Sheldybett (talk) 07:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Well, the article needs categories; alter those for 1862 Avon by-election. The newspaper ref goes in a separate template. Hugo999 (talk) 08:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
The newspaper refs is from Papers Past using dates around the election date and search terms "Election" and "Avon". And if you wanted to find more on the losing candidate say "Avon" and "Allen" for a week or three before the election. But for 19c elections look at the nomination meeting and read past the speeches you will see that the returning officer (who got three cheers) said there was no other candidate just Reeves; nominated by Robert Wilkin and seconded by George Allen. Sometimes with two candidate they had a show of hands. The losing candidate could then demand a poll which the Returning Officer would set a date, say in a couple of days. See the ref declaring Reeves elected: [1] PS: as advised by Schwede66 (above) you can just cut off the part of the Paper Plus internet ref after the query mark (?).
NB: the template needs percentages of the vote as well which I get from an Excel spreadsheet. And now I have two screens with a bigger new one for Xmas. Hugo999 (talk) 09:33, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Category:Christianity in New Zealand by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Christianity in New Zealand by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
Keep it up! Sheldybett (talk) 07:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC) |
1878 Cheviot by-election
Have just set up the results template but now is bed time for me. Just in case you get to this article tonight. Schwede66 09:16, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
10.25 and the night is young (thanks re Cheviot) Hugo999 (talk) 09:26, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Completed all 19c by-elections with 1878 Waipa by-election Hugo999 (talk) 10:48, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1859 Kansas elections
A tag has been placed on Category:1859 Kansas elections requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:39, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- ^ "The Avon Election". Lyttelton Times. 12 March 1867.