User talk:Gwen Gale/archive22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edelseider / RCS

Hello Gwen- Blast from the past here, from way back in the aughts! I noticed by chance that you had encountered someone a while back with whom I'm having some trouble at the moment. See User_talk:Diannaa#Bend_your_ear.3F for more info, and note that that post pre-dates the discovery that prompted my contacting you. I now see that this editor--a native German speaker who edits under the unified login "Edelseider" and, despite unfortunate language challenges, is these days most active here on en.wp--is someone you blocked in a past incarnation as User:RCS. First, do you know if it's ok for him to be editing here again? And second, if it came to it, would you be willing to mention on the ANI (see Diannaa talkpage link) something about his trouble-making past? The admins who have chimed in so far don't seem to have discovered Edelseider/RCS's contentious editing practices, and seem to be treating the issue like a spat between me and him, not perceiving, apparently, that I avoid directly engaging him. Thanks in advance for any attention you can give this; I understand that it's out of the blue and somewhat tedious... Eric talk 23:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

How do you know it's User:RCS? Gwen Gale (talk) 03:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, forgot that part! By Edelseider's own assertion on his de.wp talkpage, at the beginning of this section (in German). You'll find an editor interaction analysis here showing 104 articles in common; not sure how much this tells you. I tried to find a tool that counts the number of different articles an editor has edited so I could compare the two accounts in that way, but couldn't find one. See also: RCS' last 1,000 contributions, Edelseider's first 1,000. Thanks, Eric talk 12:03, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Gwen, here is some proof. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Yes, I do think User:Edelseider and User:RCS are very likely one in the same. I blocked RCS seven years ago. Indefinte blocks tend to go stale after a year or two, even if the software lock isn't lifted. He seems to have come back as Edelseider 4 1/2 years later. That's a very long time here. Had I been aware of that at the time, I think I would've done no more than left a note on his talk saying something like, "Hey there, I know it's you, no big worries, please be good :)" He has edited for 3 1/2 years with no blocks. As the blocking admin, my outlook is, "sounds ok to me." Hence, I don't see this as socking or block evasion as such and will not block on this alone.
Eric, the edits of some non-native-English-speaking editors can stir up some woe now and then. Cleaning up syntax and grammar takes time. The language/cultural barrier can indeed stir up misunderstandings. Donc, on se calme. One chills out and deals with it, hopefully like a pro (which takes more time), a big slice of being a truly helpful volunteer. See also this take on editing Wikipedia
Eric, please heed Diannaa's words of wisdom elsewhere. I know you're here in very good faith. However, from what I can see, you went astray not only by making personal attacks, but you way canvassed them (WP:CANVASS). Please don't do that again :)
Even when bringing up what one sees as untoward editing by another, one must back it up with diffs to edits straightforwardly outside the bounds of policy and stay wholly neutral in wording.
Meanwhile, I think the best and easiest way to settle this down is for you to stay away from Edelseider and his edits for a month or two. Gwen Gale (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
@Eric: is really going to enormous lengths to try and get me evicted from Wikipedia, I really wonder why. He should come clear and clean and tell us all why he is so obsessed with me. Yes, I used to be RCS (talk · contribs); I also used to be Insert coins (talk · contribs). And I have done a lot of good things here! I write and edit articles and from time to time, I lose my temper. Without me, Wikipedia would be much poorer in content. But I have never stalked somebody and bullied somebody the way Eric does. He should stay away from me and my edits forever. --Edelseider (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Gwen- Thanks for your time and attention to this. While I don't see my posts as personal attacks--certainly nowhere near the level of tantrums and direct insults that this editor has routinely engaged in here and on de.wp--I appreciate your input. I did not know that the multiple comments under his nominations would constitute canvassing; had I realized that, I would have only posted a single one to alert editors to the self-promotion, despite his multiple affirmation-seeking nominations (which I infer do not constitute canvassing?).
I wish I did not know of the existence of Edelseider and editors like him. But occasionally I run across editing messes where I cannot help but suggest better editing habits. And if my initial polite suggestions are met with rudeness and self-righteousness, my generosity tends to wane. When Edelseider bolted straight to the ANI, and seemed to be immediately taken for an innocent, injured party by some commenters, I felt I had to prompt them to take a closer look at him, despite my reluctance to reward his attention-seeking behavior. I restrained myself (with some help) from posting there about his history on de.wp, which includes three reports on him from different editors as well as two blocks for personal attacks. It vexes me that I even spent the time on him to learn those things, but I got the impression no one else was going to.
It's no problem for me to stay away from Edelseider; I never wanted anything to do with him. Thanks again for your time and advice. Eric talk 21:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Both of you, please comment only on the edits, not the editor. Even saying good things about an editor may now and then seem like more than what's needed Oo. When commenting on what one sees as worrisome edits, one must always back it up with plenty of diffs and be way careful (stay neutral) with the wording. If good faith edits seem a bit sloppy or whatever, it's most often far easier and kinder to wait a bit, then go in and helpfully clean up the syntax, grammar and such.
I'd guess that, through the years, I've done this myself more than a thousand times, on copy written both by native and non-native English speakers. Still do. It takes time. It's work. If you don't want to deal with it, by far the best thing to do is, nothing at all.
Truly disruptive editors, such as those who let their lost, hot tempers show up on-wiki, sooner or later do get warned and if need be, shooed away from the kerfluffle or even blocked. Gwen Gale (talk) 22:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, Gwen, I must have been unclear in my above statements. I know all about diffs, thanks. I wasn't trying to document anything here, nor prompt you to undertake any action beyond advising me, unless you felt compelled to add some context to the ANI complaint. At first I merely wanted to determine if the RCS connection and history were relevant to the ANI. Later, I was just trying to explain myself to you to clarify the original motivation behind my offending posts, and to assure you that this issue did not arise out of a quarrel. I'm quite done with the whole thing, thanks. I do appreciate your work here, and I'm sorry to have taken up your time with this unfortunate business. Eric talk 23:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

I wasn't talking about here. Meanwhile, Beeblebrox is waiting for your answer over at ANI. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Not sure what to say there. I feel like I should never have dignified it with a response at all. Eric talk 23:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
I've been trying to help you. If you don't answer "yes" to an interaction ban between you and Edelseider (who has already agreed, voluntarily), Beeblebrox may likely make your side of it an involuntary sanction. I wholly agree with Beeblebrox.
By utter happenstance, both of you may want to read, at the top of User:Beeblebrox's user page, the quote from my dear old WP-friend User:Antandrus. It's so way fitting here. Gwen Gale (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

Kobi Arad

Hi Gwen, three questions:

1. My name is Michael, Arad's manager, and therefore do not edit his articles. Is it ok if I ask an editor-frnd to edit the draft (I already before asked my frnd Peter Pattern)?

2. Does the following notability specifics seem fair as to be incorporated within the draft:

Subject meets notability in following sections:

WP:GNG

Non trivial and objective coverage by reliable sources such as: ynet.com, Jewish Week, All About Jazz (article) and Israel Times.

WP:MUSICBIO (Although single section notability is sufficient, Arad meets notability in 4 different sections)

Section1: Multiple Reliable Publications:

http://m.ynet.co.il/Articles/4182867https://www.allaboutjazz.com/sketches-of-imaginary-landscapes-kobi-arad-self-produced-review-by-glenn-astarita.php?width=412http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/for-jewish-artists-a-space-of-ones-own/

Section 6: Several of Kobi Arad's projects, featured several notable musicians:

● 'Sufi Songs' Trio featuring Bob Moses (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Moses_(musician) and Cecil Mcbee (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_McBee)

Sources:

- http://www.tunedloud.com/2017/07/05/kobi-arad-ellington-upside-down-as-a-musical-portrait-of-the-jazz-titan/

- https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/community_feed/jazz_pianist_kobi_arad_a_career_overview.html

● Grammy Awards- Claes Nobel Team Participating Notable musicians: Wouter Kellerman, Brent Fischer, Robert Margouleff, Mickey Stevenson, Ganda Boys

Sources: - http://fmwebtv.com/TheForgottenPeople/ - https://article.wn.com/view/2017/01/24/Kobi_Arad_Performs_with_Members_of_Israeli_Orchestra_in_Tel_/ - https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/community_feed/jazz_pianist_kobi_arad_a_career_overview.html

Section 7:

● Arad is a world-wide authority in the Third Stream style, as he is the first and only (as of 2012) musician to earn doctorate in the field.

Sources: - Letter from Dean of New England Conservatory of Music to Kobi Arad (dating 2012): https://issuu.com/kobiarad/docs/novak_letter - https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_stream - http://m.ynet.co.il/Articles/4182867

Section 9:

Arad participted in multitude of interviews which featured panel discussions, airplay and interviews in Israeli National Radio, IBA (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Broadcasting_Authority).

Sources:

- http://www.tunedloud.com/2017/07/05/kobi-arad-ellington-upside-down-as-a-musical-portrait-of-the-jazz-titan/ - https://issuu.com/zmiralu/docs/selection (Letter from Iba editor Zmira Luzki) - https://issuu.com/acum9/docs/5_7_1_ (BMI international airplay statements) - https://issuu.com/acum9/docs/9 (BMI international airplay statements)

3. In case the requirements are fulfilled (links are alive, and you find #2 satisfactory, are you going to be willing to assist in living the draft and unsalt 'Kobi Arad' article?

Thanks :=) Ee212 (talk) 23:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

  • I was told by some editors I could edit draft thru WP:AFC - is that correct? Ee212 (talk) 23:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Having looked into it, I think this topic does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (music). Please be aware, this has nothing to do with any outlook I may have as to Mr Arad's talent, skills, work or background.
Given the sources cited, I would see no need to carry on editing a draft at WP:AFC until such time as citations showing this topic meets a notability standard might later show up. Gwen Gale (talk) 05:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gwen Gale. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

Irene Craigmile Bolam article: please check what happens there

Hello Gwen, hope you are doing well!

I would like to attract your attention to the article "Irene Craigmile Bolam": both of us contributed several times into editing it.

During the last period some person using the name "Gibsononian" repeatedly replaces the text of the article with conspiracy fantasies of the conspiracy theorist Tod Swindell, that were debunked and discredited long ago. I think this is a deliberate campaign of misinformation of the readers and serious abuse of Wikipedia, that demand some proper reaction.

Kind regards - Alex V Mandel (talk) 15:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Alex. Looks like they've stopped for now. My outlook/understanding on the topic aside (highly, highly likely Irene was not Amelia) their edits were wholly usourced so I'd say any editor can freely undo them on sight, short of blatant 3RR. Next step would be to give them a stern warning. Keep me posted if need be. Cheers. Gwen Gale (talk) 07:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gwen Gale. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

Xmas

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

Possible Sockepuppeteer

Hi Gwen, I'm concerned that MyMainAccount is a socket puppeteer being a user that brought up here [1] I the issue does exist but I believe largely because the deadlink wasn't archived there are other sources that say the same thing as the specific source that is being targeted. I'm very suspicious of the user that added the tag to the article b/c that was literally the first thing the user has done on wiki. I thought this was unusual for a first time user.Mcelite (talk) 17:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

Article Moved without discussion

Hi Gwen, Clouded leopard was moved to Mainland clouded leopard with no discussion among editors. I wasn't sure if this could be a simple redirect or not it was done by one user randomly with no discussion. Thank you for your time and help.Mcelite (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Happily, someone moved it back before I saw this. As an aside, would that there were housecats with coats like that. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:36, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

Season's Greetings

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

"Anaheim Boulevard" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Anaheim Boulevard. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 5#Anaheim Boulevard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -322UbnBr2 (Talk | Contributions | Actions) 21:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux Talk 00:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

The Signpost: 29 March 2024