User talk:Gerald Waldo Luis/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

→

Archive of talks, archived November 2021.

List of World Heritage Sites in Indonesia copyedit request

Thanks for requesting a copyedit for List of World Heritage Sites in Indonesia, and I wanted to make sure you understood why it was declined. I don't routinely run Earwig's tool before a copyedit, but Twofingered Typist probably had a reason to suspect copyright problems. Wikipedia has a number of UNESCO World Heritage Site articles, some of which I've copyedited. The organization's copyright policy is unclear, but many of their images seem to be licensed CC-BY-SA 3.0. Text, however, must be rewritten in your own words with attribution; any word-for-word copying must be enclosed in quotation marks (again with attribution), and be in accordance with WP's fair-use policy. Stay well and all the best, Miniapolis 16:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Miniapolis, it was not declined, I withdrew it. But thanks for the license explanation. Gerald WL 01:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Good Dinosaur

The article The Good Dinosaur you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Good Dinosaur for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Good Dinosaur

The article The Good Dinosaur you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Good Dinosaur for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

La Carreta Mexican Restaurant

If you're interested, I've nominated La Carreta Mexican Restaurant for Good article status. Either way, I'm curious if you're comfortable with how I sourced the restaurant's opening date based on the official website? I've searched hard but been unable to find the year of establishment in a journalistic source. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Another Believer, I've picked up the GAN! If there's really no searchable secondaries for the date, primaries are fine. I mean, secondary sources won't exist without primary sources, so... Gerald WL 06:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Gerald Waldo Luis, Great, thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Ave Maryam

the novel of Lady Chaterley was read in the beginning by main character as she gone to bed Please rewatch the movie carefully, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duskerin (talk • contribs) 07:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Duskerin, feel free to add it back, but please leave a detailed edit summary every time you do such edits. Gerald WL 13:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Also, don't add a reference to Wikipedia per WP:RSP. Gerald WL 13:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Plandemic

On 8 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Plandemic, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Plandemic was criticized for its professional-style production? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Plandemic. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Plandemic), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

New message from SounderBruce

Hello, Gerald Waldo Luis. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Seattle Center Monorail/archive2.
Message added 07:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sounder Bruce 07:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

If you are able to, please continue with your FAC review, as it is the only uncompleted review for the article. If you are unable to continue, then please leave a note on the review page. Sounder Bruce 19:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2021

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 13, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2021
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2021, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation

VG Project Main pages
- Main project – talk
- Project category – talk
- Portal – talk
VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
- Reference library – talk
- Newsletter – talk
- Video game images – talk

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC))

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Help with FAC nomination for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered

Gerald Waldo Luis Hi. Having been one of the users that contributed to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered's peer review earlier in the year, I was wondering if you would help contribute in reviewing the article for its FAC nomination? It has been open for a few days but I've received no responses from any editors. It would be really appreciated if you could give any feedback and help move the article further towards reaching FA standard. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 17:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Plandemic

Hello, Gerald Waldo Luis. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Plandemic at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Gerald Waldo Luis, I've made a lot of changes to the article's structure and layout, and I completely removed the section titled "Sinclair Broadcasting Group", which is off-topic for this article but it might be useful at Judy Mikovits or elsewhere—it's on the talk page if you want it. Good luck with the article and cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC).

You are invited to help in KRI Nanggala (402) article!

I've seen that you have done quite a job with Sriwijaya Air Flight 182 and I invite you to develop the KRI Nanggala article. --Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 12:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Gerald. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Latvian submissions for the Academy Award for Best International Feature Film – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 7. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Rethymno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heinemann.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Did Dr. Fauci Create COVID-19?.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Did Dr. Fauci Create COVID-19?.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Plandemic behind the scene.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Plandemic behind the scene.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Ytoyoda, hey there, I've updated the description box, can you take a look? Personally I can't see why this meets the deletion criteria of F7. There is Rashid Buttar in the film-- that photo-- which is unconveyable via text, so I used the image. It also gives readers more sense as to the conspiratorial nature of the film. Thank you! Gerald WL 13:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. If it's significant that Rashid Buttar is in the film and it's a significant fact, then it should be sourced to a reliable third-party source. If you're relying on a screenshot of a BTS footage, then that would qualify as original research. If you think it doesn't meet the criteria for speedy deletion, we can convert to a deletion discussion. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Ytoyoda, well, it's not just a BTS footage. It's a photo published by Ojai Valley News, a third-party newspaper. Gerald WL 13:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help copy edit. Thank you. Vnosm (talk) 12:45, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Vnosm, hi there. But I'm sorry that I can't copyedit for the moment, because of real-life work. You can post this on WP:GOCE/R and others would be happy to copy edit. Gerald WL 01:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Did Dr. Fauci Create COVID-19?.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Did Dr. Fauci Create COVID-19?.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of See You in the Cosmos

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article See You in the Cosmos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 18:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Vincent (painter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woodbridge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Ratings tables

I understand that because a template exists it might seem like good idea to use it. But there were discussions at Project Film and they actively discouraged using them. (IIRC Project Games isn't enthusiastic about them either. But I'm having difficulty finding the old archived discussions, because I can't guess exactly the right search keywords.) Unfortunately MOSFILM doesn't document their all advice very well, you have to also look at what Good articles and Featured articles do and more importantly don't do.

That's why there are almost no film articles are using them. (Except this one The Tracey Fragments (film) and maybe some recent articles.)

The Raid was one of the last few film articles using the table but it was removed, diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Raid_(2011_film)&diff=961243311&oldid=959157800 (... I did add it back temporarily, but only to make sure all the reviews were included as PROSE and then I removed it again.) You could ask User:Bovineboy2008

If you don't believe me you should go to WT:MOSFILM and start a discussion, ask them if you should add review ratings tables to film articles. -- 109.78.194.208 (talk) 22:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

This is very funny actually, because an editor also recently removed the table at another article I created, who also cited the thing you cited. But that's, like, a loooong time ago, and it uses a different template. At it's core, I don't find rating tables harmful: it just lists what some reviewers rate the film as a supplement to the prose. As you said, it's old; if you look now, WP:VideoGames has now reached an agreement that rating tables are allowed. Gerald WL 01:03, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I saw in the edit history where you said there was a discussion. There was no discussion on the article talk page. You did not link to any discussion in your edit summary.

Project Video Games, Project Film, and Project Television all have slightly different rules. They really should make more of an effort to sort that out. But you can't assume the rules from one project apply to another.

Even if the rules have changed, please remember that WP:PROSE comes first. I'm sure some editors will complain that ratings tables are both reductive and redundant.

But again, please clearly link to this discussion that you say supports the use of {{Film and game ratings}} in Wikipedia film articles. -- 109.78.194.208 (talk) 01:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I see a discussion was started at Project Film. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#Rating_table

The discussion has not yet concluded, there is no sign of consensus for or against. Please wait until the discussion concludes before adding Ratings tables to any more articles. -- 109.78.194.208 (talk) 01:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I'll continue to use your talk page. Just continue the discussion there. Gerald WL 01:44, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of See You in the Cosmos

The article See You in the Cosmos you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:See You in the Cosmos for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	nice Misguiden (talk) 12:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	nice Misguiden (talk) 12:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Editing news 2021 #2

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations \| July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jojo Rabbit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jojo Rabbit you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MSG17 -- MSG17 (talk) 02:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited To Fly!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washingtonian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jojo Rabbit

The article Jojo Rabbit you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jojo Rabbit for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MSG17 -- MSG17 (talk) 21:42, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Gerald Waldo Luis:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2300 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Jojo Rabbit improvements

Hi, Gerald Waldo Luis. Thanks for all your work improving Jojo Rabbit! Apologies for my mistaken revert earlier, too. I only meant to add back one of the citations that seemed helpful to have. Please take care, and thanks again for your efforts. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Wallyfromdilbert, thanks again. But I have reverted your edit, reason given in the summary. Gerald WL 18:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

I actually just restored that citation again, because it is very helpful given that the paragraph cites multiple different sources. Having a citation at the end of each of the sentences (as opposed to relying on the citation in the middle of the next sentence) helps readers and other editors know where each piece of information came from, and also helps maintain the integrity of the sourcing if another editor adds addition content to that paragraph. I don't think this has any major negative impact, and I hope you will take this to the article's talk page to explain what the negative impact is if you continue to disagree. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Wallyfromdilbert, it's just vague. It's common practice that, if two sentences use the same cite, that it be put at the last sentence only. It's also consistent this way throughout the article, so adding this will be inconsistent. Gerald WL 04:12, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

As an addition, if an editor were to add another claim, there should be enough awareness to add that citation again. If no, then I'm watchlisting the article, and I'm going to be that person. There's really no benefit in duplicate citations— it's duplicate, just like duplicate links. Gerald WL 04:21, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

As an example, FAs like MAX Orange Line—today's featured article— also employs this. Gerald WL 04:25, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of See You in the Cosmos

The article See You in the Cosmos you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:See You in the Cosmos for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 19:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for DYK review

I appreciate your review of the dyk for Van Dorn Hooker. About the "Selected Publications" — only 3 of his books are listed. He also published a war memoir, "The War In Which I Did Not Fight", which I couldn't find, and the rest of his publications are listed on Google Scholar. When I approved the article at AfC, I did not add any of the multiple pdfs... too lazy. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 16:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Grand'mere Eugene, thanks for clarifying. Technically you're not obligated to read the memoir in order to list it: you just need to know the title, publisher, identifier if available, and put it in Template:Cite book. I can tolerate the Scholar bit for DYK standard, though note that if you were to bring it up to GA or FA, you're gonna need to list all of em. PDFs are not required, though can significantly improve the article. Also archive them whenever possible.

On a lighter note, I also have Template:Did you know nominations/Jojo Rabbit unreviewed; maybe you can try do so? Again, just a note if you're interested. Cheers! Gerald WL 17:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Done — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 17:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Living in the Age of Airplanes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Island.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Jojo Rabbit

On 19 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jojo Rabbit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jojo Rabbit director Taika Waititi, a Polynesian Jew, also starred in the film as an imaginary Adolf Hitler? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jojo Rabbit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jojo Rabbit), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Living in the Age of Airplanes

On 26 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Living in the Age of Airplanes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Living in the Age of Airplanes was the first IMAX film to be shot on all seven continents? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Living in the Age of Airplanes. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Living in the Age of Airplanes), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Reddit is still blocked in Indonesia

Yesterday a post in Reddit points out China, Bangladesh, and Indonesia as the only three countries blocking Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/ot6o6z

It got crossposted to r/Indonesia, and in turn someone linked the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit that claim Reddit is already unblocked based on https://www.cilacap.info/platform-reddit-kini-dibuka-blokir-di-indonesia

That reporter experience is just a common situation where some ISPs didn't sync their blocklist correctly with the government-mandated blocklist. The official ministry database https://trustpositif.kominfo.go.id/ still listed reddit.com as one of the blocked domain, so officially Reddit is still blocked.

I'd edit the page myself but it's semi-protected. Martheencp (talk) 03:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Martheencp, thanks for pointing this out! I was also feeling suspicious when I couldn't open Reddit without my VPN. Immediately removed that bit. Gerald WL 03:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Life science

Too hard to find some answers in my book Jmn joyze (talk) 17:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Jmn joyze, what do you mean? Gerald WL 00:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Removed content

Hi Gerald Waldo Luis, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! ~TNT (she/they • talk) 09:53, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

TheresNoTime, hi there, thanks for notifying me about it. I am well aware of WP:YOUNG, and I don't consider myself giving excess information, as it is just (if i remember correctly) my age. It doesn't seem to be explicitly covered in WP:YOUNG; even if it is covered, I've got no harm so far, if I do I've been trained to respond to them. I'm also confused: what counts as a minor? 16 and below? 17 and below? A response would be highly appreciated. Gerald WL 13:01, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Killer (2016 film)

Hello, Gerald Waldo Luis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Killer (2016 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, Lee Vilenski, BennyOnTheLoose, Amakuru and Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Will P. Brady/GA1

Gerald Waldo Luis, a friendly reminder that you opened this nomination for review over two months ago, and while you made some progress, there's over half of the article unreviewed and you haven't posted to it in over a month. Do you think you will be able to finish it soon, or should it be put back into the pool of unreviewed nominations in the hopes of finding someone who will be able to finish it more quickly? (The WikiCup is in its final two-month phase, and around 125 reviews have been completed since the beginning of the month, so finding a new reviewer is likely to be easier at the moment, especially with this being the fifth oldest GAN, far older than any unreviewed nomination.) Please let me know. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

BlueMoonset, apologies for the delay! I would recommend finding a new reviewer, since I am only able to review on desktop and it is experiencing a problem where I couldn't type in the editor. Sorry for the delay and this inconvenience, your article is already good and I wish the GAN good luck. Gerald WL 08:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. I've put it back into the pool for a new reviewer. I didn't realize at the time that you also have Talk:Interlingue/GA1 open. Should I do the same for that nomination? It looks like it, too, was not completed. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

BlueMoonset, sorry for the late reply (again!) And yes please, do the same for Interlingue. Wish that nomination good luck, and hopefully I can fix my device ASAP. Gerald WL 14:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Supernova (2014 film)

Hello, Gerald Waldo Luis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Supernova (2014 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Caging Skies

Hello, Gerald Waldo Luis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Caging Skies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antichrist (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scrapbook.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Supernova (2014 film)

Hello, Gerald Waldo Luis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Supernova".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:

The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)