User talk:Erick Soares3

Warning: Since I can't know if an IP address is being used by the same person, I will not reply to anonymous replies anymore. Erick Soares3 (talk) 11:57, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Erick Soares3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt (talk) 16:44, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 16 § Category:Rocket launches

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 16 § Category:Rocket launches on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1993 in spaceflight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INPE.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Gaganyaan-4 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gaganyaan-4. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Ozzie10aaaa: I saw it and I kindly disagree, since WP:TOO SOON says that "If sources do not exist, it is generally too soon for an article on that topic to be considered.", which, as yourself well said in the comment, isn't the case here (but could be for Shenzhou 18 or SpaceX Crew-9 and clearly is for Draft:Gaganyaan-2 and Draft:Gaganyaan-3). There's no indication that "TOO SOON" would block events that are still a long time to happen, if there are independent sources, or Polaris Dawn, dearMoon project, and Boeing Crewed Flight Test could have been deleted long ago. Personally, I only sent the article for review because I will only get noticed by the editors if it goes to the main page (just see how quickly everyone developed the crew biographies). Cheers, Erick Soares3 (talk) 00:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Gaganyaan-4 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gaganyaan-4. Thanks! (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 09:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Request for assistance at Human-rating_certification#ISRO

Thanks very much for your work on the Gaganyaan-4 draft. Did you find anything while developing that article that would help expand Human-rating_certification#ISRO? (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 09:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

@Sdsds Hello and thanks! I only saw about the engine, but it felt better suited for the Gaganyaan-1 background (since it was one of the last tests before its launch). I saw your comment in the draft: if you have anything for the page, you can add it (as they say, be bold). This draft thing is making me highly frustrated: while the Wikipedia is supposed to be collaborative, everyone seems afraid to collaborate on it - while the crew pages were fast developed in a few days time. I'm almost moving it to main space myself, since there are pages (like I've cited elsewhere) that have far less material and no one has "killed it"... Erick Soares3 (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes, my own experience with creating articles without prior discussion has been largely good. The 'articles for deletion' process can feel fairly harsh for some editors; the 'request for creation' process is intended to decrease the ill feelings associated with a deletion. (Creating a temporary redirect at the article page name you intend to eventually publish, and pointing it to a section of some well-established article where you develop the material can work too.) (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 12:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

@Sdsds I only created the draft for G-4 because I honestly thought that we wouldn't have anything of substance until far later, while I created the Gaganyaan-1 page directly (way back in 2022) because I found a large amount of sources. For much, I would like to invite the users from the local India Wikipedias to help out, since I'm betting that there must have more sources in the local languages than in English. Erick Soares3 (talk) 12:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

As a possible relevant example: I've created the pages VLS-1 V01, VLS-1 V02 and Félix I, and there are far more sources in Portuguese than in English (for the first two cases, I couldn't find anything in English). Erick Soares3 (talk) 12:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

@Sdsds I have just saw what you did in the draft: it is looking great! When you have time, look at Draft:Gaganyaan-2 and Draft:Gaganyaan-3: it will take sometime until we have something for them, but those pages need to be somewhat active. Erick Soares3 (talk) 16:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaganyaan-4 (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaganyaan-4 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Erick Soares3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing:, the Gaganyaan-4 page was created as a stub, long after the creation of the Draft, and would have been sent to Draft space anyway. Could you just move the material to the main space? Erick Soares3 (talk) 10:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Move what material to the main space? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:35, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

The Draft:Gaganyaan-4: it predates the page Gaganyaan-4 for several days, and it seems that I can't just copy-and-paste since it would be necessary to move the page History. One option would be just to improve the stub, but it would make no sense, since there's a page already done. Erick Soares3 (talk) 11:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Gaganyaan-4 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gaganyaan-4. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)