User talk:Beshogur/Archive 4
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Turkish soldiers POW or MIA
Beshogur, sources are cited right there besides "Per Turkey:" in the section's heading. Read the cited articles "Turkish Forces Target Strategic Hill Near Syria's Afrin" [1] & "Turkish Forces Target Hill in Syria" [2]. Its clearly stated per Erdogan that some soldiers are either missing or captured by the YPG, that they are working on bringing them back and that he talked to one of the wives of the captured/missing. Hope this clears it up. EkoGraf (talk) 16:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- 2 soldiers who were "captured" are captured bodies, not alive. Turkish Armed forces announced their names, apparently YPG has the bodies of 2 Turkish soldiers. There's a misunderstanding. Beshogur (talk) 17:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- I have not seen these sources about the capture of 2 soldier's bodies. Can you provide them? EkoGraf (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Look here -> "23 Ocak 2018 tarihinde Zeytin Dalı Harekât bölgesinde meydana gelen çatışmalarda şehit olan iki kahraman silah arkadaşımızın naaşlarına, bölgede çatışmaların devam etmesi ve hava koşullarının uygun olmaması sebebiyle ulaşılamamıştır." You can use Google Translate. These soldiers were announced as KIA. Beshogur (talk) 17:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Source doesn't say their bodies were seized by the YPG. It only says that at that time they couldn't reach the bodies due to the fighting. Plus its four days before the statement by Erdogan making it somewhat out-dated. Let's wait a few days and see if the situation clears up. If in a few days no new info surfaces about soldiers missing or captured I will personally remove that mention from the infobox. EkoGraf (talk) 17:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Erdogan was talking about these bodies. Of course it will be seized by YPG, otherwise is not logical. Beshogur (talk) 17:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- You may be right, but unless what you just said is also in the sources (which it isn't) it is only our personal view of the situation, which Wikipedia doesn't take into account. In any case, I will remove it if no new info shows by Friday, I think enough time will pass by then. EkoGraf (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Erdogan was talking about these bodies. Of course it will be seized by YPG, otherwise is not logical. Beshogur (talk) 17:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Source doesn't say their bodies were seized by the YPG. It only says that at that time they couldn't reach the bodies due to the fighting. Plus its four days before the statement by Erdogan making it somewhat out-dated. Let's wait a few days and see if the situation clears up. If in a few days no new info surfaces about soldiers missing or captured I will personally remove that mention from the infobox. EkoGraf (talk) 17:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Look here -> "23 Ocak 2018 tarihinde Zeytin Dalı Harekât bölgesinde meydana gelen çatışmalarda şehit olan iki kahraman silah arkadaşımızın naaşlarına, bölgede çatışmaların devam etmesi ve hava koşullarının uygun olmaması sebebiyle ulaşılamamıştır." You can use Google Translate. These soldiers were announced as KIA. Beshogur (talk) 17:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- I have not seen these sources about the capture of 2 soldier's bodies. Can you provide them? EkoGraf (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkish military operation in Afrin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Étienne Dolet (talk) 20:02, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Disruptive
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. At this point, you are edit-warring against what many users (i.e. EkoGraf, Khirurg, Calthinus) have said on the talk page regarding Anadolu Agency and other Turkish state-sponsored/runned news media outlets as stand-alone claims. Also, it looks like you're WP:GAMING. You waited 24 hours and 3 minutes since your last revert just to revert again. I suggest you self-revert and respect what the consensus has to say about such edits. Étienne Dolet (talk) 23:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
COPYVIO
Your recent edit on the Afrin article is a copyvio. You should edit it in such a way where it won’t make such a violation. Étienne Dolet (talk) 23:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Étienne Dolet (talk) 02:35, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Asking help to review this article
hello , I am begginer in wikipedia, I hope you could review this article and give me feedback to enhance my skills https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Joseph_Zyss
1RR
Beshogur,
I will assume good faith and believe that you accidently removed my addition in your recent edit. Sometimes that can happen when we make edits that are in between others. Please add it back or it’s a 1RR violation. Étienne Dolet (talk) 09:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Can you help mi?
Please add azerbaijani People in Van and Bitlis Province (Küresünni) and in Ağrı Province (Qarapapak). And azerbaijani are majority of khoy and salmas Province in iran. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Idioma_azerí.png
http://kuresunniler.com/245/kuresunnilerin-turkiyede-yasadiklari-yerler/
http://www.terekemekarapapakturkleri.com/?Bid=486078
Amirxa (talk) 20:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Brother I'm talking to you. Do you help mi? Or not?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirxa (talk • contribs) 11:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Syrian Turkmen
Syrian Turkmen'de ki saçmalıklara bir göz atarmısın lütfen? Selçuk Denizli (talk) 13:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Beshogur. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkish military intervention in Syria (August 2016–March 2017), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afrin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Operation Olive Branch
On 20 January 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Operation Olive Branch, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
You violated 1RR
You should self-revert at least two reverts: [3][4][5] Étienne Dolet (talk) 23:55, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- The first edit was about an old map. Why should we add an old map? Second edit, Ip user was trying to vandalize the article, I reverted. Third edit is not a revert, I replaced the text. Beshogur (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- Alright, I could let it slide. But just letting you know: if I don’t report, someone else will. Syrian Civil War articles are under 1RR. Étienne Dolet (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Étienne Dolet (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
deletion tags
Hi, the next time you nominate an article for speedy deletion, as you did on Talk:Kurdish National Congress please place the tag on the article itself, not on the talk page, otherwise admins may think you want the talk page deleted and ignore the article. I have moved the tag for you and replaced it with one that has a valid rationale for speedy deletion (See WP:CSD) as almost all of the content is a blatant copyright violation of a now removed website. Thanks. Iffy★Chat -- 20:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
January 2018
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."