User talk:Allamericanbear

Speedy deletion nomination of Buffalo Transit Company, Inc.

A tag has been placed on Buffalo Transit Company, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 08:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Friend to Friend Masonic Memorial

See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Friend to Friend Masonic Memorial. Dcoetzee 05:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

IRC logo

227px File:International Railway Co logo.gif Useddenim (talk) 23:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Was looking at using the double-winged logo that I've found on schedules, but actually like these a lot more! Thanks!

--Allamericanbear (talk) 02:52, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Note that Eeekster marked the high-res version for speedy deletion only 12 minutes after I had uploaded it! (I guess some people don't have anything beter to do with their life than delete other people's contributions.)

Testing changes to Routes of Buffalo Streetcars page

The page (I actually started) is pretty confusing, and not up to Wikipedia standards.

To maintain an encyclopedic approach, I'm toying with an infobox and print to see where it all goes, and if it's actually doable. Also, I'm going to need to find my copies of a number of books on this subject...will hope to get started on this within the week.

---

Abbott Road streetcar

Abt - Abbott Road 14 - Abbott Road
Overview
Status	Ceased operation, replaced with bus service
Locale	Buffalo, NY
Termini	Abbott & Woodside Swan & Erie
Service
Type	Tram
Operator(s)	International Railway Co.
Depot(s)	Broadway Barns
Rolling stock	Peter Witt Nearside
History
Opened	1915
Closed	~1936

The Abbott Road street car was the second last new car line that the International Railway Company implemented, in the network of Buffalo's streetcars. The line began at Abbott Road & Woodside in South Buffalo, and operated along the following streets:

• Abbott Road, Bailey Avenue, Seneca Street, Swan Street to Erie Street, South Division Street, Chestnut Street, Swan Street, Seneca Street, Bailey Avenue, and Abbott Road to Woodside.

By 1935, the decline of streetcar service began, and the Abbott Road streetcar was still operating, but was assigned route number 14, and operating over a slightly different route:

• Abbott Road, Smith Street, Seneca Street, Ellicott Street, Swan Street to Washington Street, Washington Street, Seneca Street, Smith Street, Abbott Road to Woodside.

24 hour service wasn't operated on this car line, and service ended at approximately 1:00am.

By 1936, Abbott Road car service was terminated, and replaced with bus service operated by the subsidiary International Bus Company.

Today, the line continues to be operated by the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, between Washington Street & Mohawk Street and the Shops at West Seneca, McKinley Mall, or Erie Community College, South Campus. It also has retained the route number 14.

---

So, what do you think?

--Allamericanbear (talk) 02:50, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Hmm... As you said above, not really an encyclopedic approach; really, more of a list redone in prose. I'd suggest looking at London Transport Central Area Routes 1–3 as an example of descriptive bus route histories. Having said that, it's certainly a good start. I'd suggest adding Points of Interest/Important Places Served, and – if you can come up with a list of stop locations – route diagrams. Useddenim (talk) 12:31, 15 May 2011 (UTC) (BTW, are you located in/near Buffalo?)

Am in the city, having lived here at least 1/2 my life. I don't know much about the points of interest/important places served, since the IRC isn't the carrier any more nor does much look the same here. Right now, I'm trying to get down the act of balancing the infoboxes so that they don't touch each other so much, while allowing proper content and not filling the left with filler. It's all a work in progress though, and hope I can get something a little more adequate in place. --Allamericanbear (talk) 15:40, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

If you want to discuss this via phone (having a conversation via email is like trying to swim in molasses) you can call me at 689-4381.

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Allamericanbear, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User talk:Allamericanbear. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for pitching in

at List of monuments of the Gettysburg Battlefield‎. That list is turning out to be quite the tar baby and we need, welcome and appreciate all the support that we can get. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

LaSalle (Metro Rail) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Right-of-way and Turnout

Lafayette Square (Metro Rail) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Liberty Building

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. --Allamericanbear (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Rail accidents

No proble. It has been fixed now. Simply south...... going on editing sprees for just 6 years (as of 28/03/2006) 22:56, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. When you recently edited List of bus transit systems in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chautauqua County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of NFTA 4 Broadway Bus

The article NFTA 4 Broadway Bus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information is extremely outdated, and much of it is covered in List of NFTA Bus Routes. If you check the history, I started this page a long time back, and it didn't quite make it as "noteworthy", in my opinion.

Safe to say it's worthy of removal?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Allamericanbear (talk) 16:30, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of NFTA 69 Alden Express Bus

The article NFTA 69 Alden Express Bus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information is extremely outdated, and much of it is covered in List of NFTA Bus Routes. If you check the history, I started this page a long time back, and it didn't quite make it as "noteworthy", in my opinion.

Safe to say it's worthy of removal?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Allamericanbear (talk) 16:31, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of NFTA 25 Delaware Bus

The article NFTA 25 Delaware Bus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information is extremely outdated, and much of it is covered in List of NFTA Bus Routes. If you check the history, I started this page a long time back, and it didn't quite make it as "noteworthy", in my opinion.

Safe to say it's worthy of removal?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Allamericanbear (talk) 16:31, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

The use of gender specific nouns.

I propose the change of the term comedian to comedienne because she is a woman. One of the two terms is feminine. Also, it is logical to use actress and follow it with comedienne. Gatmaster (talk) 22:56, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

"1860, from Fr. comédienne, fem. of comédien" from dictionary.reference.com. One is masculine; It describes only males. The other is feminine; it describes only females. English is a funny language which has been thuroughly degraded and bastardized, compared to other languages (e.g. Italian - "Lei"). We, through I know not, - inanity perhaps - lost the capability of distinguishing males from females ... & grammer. It really is a loss and not a gain (e.g. using their and getting upset at someone when he asks about the other persons since you stated multiplicty with the use of their, or assuming a male since nobody seems to know or use female equivalents). I'm ending our talk because it's close to leading me to the losses of thou and ye; saying that I'm going, meaning that I will; & "phrasal verbs"; etc.

Gatmaster (talk) 03:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Phriend to Phriend Photos

Wow, thanks for the 'heads up.' To my simple mind, existence of an article about a work of visual art without itself a visual representation of the work of art.. ..is a travesty. And a picture is worth a thousand words.

I didn't particulary care about the subject, but since I spend a lot of time in Gettysburg, I attempted to make the article more user-friendly with a photo. Now that I'm aware, I'll never spend another second on it. In fact, I may quit taking photos and uploading them to Wiki Commons altogether.

It makes me wonder. The Evergreen Cemetery Gatehouse is a privately-owned building. Ginnie Wade's sculpture in Evergreen is not publicly owned. Any given headstone in Evergreen is private property.. ..etc.--Donaldecoho (talk) 22:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Schuylkill Transportation System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ADA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Assistance, please

Since you are more knowledgeable than I am about NFTA Metro, would you review these edits and let me know if they are worth keeping or not. 96.243.56.50 (talk · contribs) has been removing references and making other more-or-less questionable random edits to articles primarily about Buffalo Metro Rail (but seems to be branching out to other Buffalo articles too). I requested a block, but it was rejected for “incorrectly or insufficiently warned” and, in fact, the Admin seemed to think “some of his edits are sourced and useful”, but I can’t say one way or the other. Useddenim (talk) 03:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

All is forgiven, please come back…

But more importantly, the IP vandal has been stopped (for at least six months), as all pages within Category:Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority and Category:Buffalo, New York Metro Rail stations are now semi-protected. Useddenim (talk) 00:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

I'll second that. We need your local knowledge. Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Good to see you're back. Your help is appreciated. Useddenim (talk) 13:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

30 Kenmore

Hiya, Sorry I never saw your reply,
Basically you nominated the article for deletion therefore your deletion reason is your delete !vote ....
Usually it takes 3 weeks until the articles deleted but that's providing there's no other comment than delete,
So in future when nominating articles you should only nominate but not !vote :)
If you have any questions I'm only a click away :)
Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I think that you misunderstood what happened. Your nomination was your "vote", but you could still make unlimited "comments". One man, one vote! Please keep editing. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for putting that - I tried to word it in a way that was easy to understand but somewhat struggled so now I've probably just confused him more . –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Wiknic for Buffalo?

User:Mitchazenia has started a proposal to have a Wikipedia:Wiknic in Buffalo, New York. You can add your comments here: Wiknic for Buffalo?. BuffaloBob (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Allamericanbear. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Toronto Coach Terminal image

WP:SOFIXIT? OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 07:14, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Fixing other peoples problems without giving them a chance to learn and do it themselves is part of the reason that half of the wikipedia site needs constant upkeep (that, being that "it's okay...someone'll clean up after me").

Additionally, if they do know what they're doing, and made a mistake with it, I gave a chance before someone deleted it because some think it's easier to just revert an entry.

I didn't know the circumstances, so I offered advice. If the user asked for help, I'd find a way to do it, while showing them how to.

Your comment is why I don't bother submitting most of the time anymore.

Cheers.

--Allamericanbear (talk) 07:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Allamericanbear. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Allamericanbear. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Allamericanbear. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Buffalo Art in Transit brochure

Hi! This may end up just going into the void as I'm not sure if you're active on here anymore, but I was hoping to ask a question about a source you cited in some articles you helped edit a long time ago on the subject of Buffalo, NY's transit system. In the article for University station (Buffalo Metro Rail), you added information about the public art on display at the station, and cited NFTA-Metro's c. 1986 brochure "Buffalo Art In Transit." You wouldn't happen to have a copy or photographs of that source, would you? I'm putting together an article cataloguing works by one of the artists whose work was included in that brochure (Sam Gilliam), and the work on display at a different NFTA-Metro stop (Delavan/Canisius University station) doesn't seem to have any public information online about the year it was completed or the material used. If the brochure had any more detailed info, that would be a great source of info. I don't live in the Buffalo area, otherwise I'd find it in a local archive/library. No worries if you can't help on this, but I appreciate your time! 19h00s (talk) 20:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Let me look around my office for the brochure.

I'm sure I can scan a few pages without issue and forward on to you. 128.205.62.30 (talk) 14:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)