Template:Did you know nominations/Jenna Ortega

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 20:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Jenna Ortega

Jenna Ortega
Jenna Ortega
Improved to Good Article status by Pamzeis (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 45 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Pamzeis (talk) 04:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC).

  • New GA, well written. Some small suggestions:
    • Might be good to add half a sentence describing It's All Love
    • A lot of character names in the running text don't add anything; a description of who the character is would be better (as is done well for Yes Day, The Fallout). Relatedly, some works (After Words, Richie Rich, etc.) are missing genre labels which would be informative.
    • Some transitions between topics are abrupt; as just one example, ... offer true horror bona fides to this flick". Ortega starred in the slasher film ...
    • portraying her character's relatability: know what you mean, but phrasing seems off
    • her character's actions and dialogue did not suit her personality: actions and dialogue in just the script or as shot? Wednesday's personality or Ortega's? could clarify
    • described the material as risky: explain
But none of that holds up this nom. Photo OK. Hooks check out except ALT0, which yes, seems a little too far for WP:CALC. Incredible QPQs. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 23:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)