Talk:Water (Kanye West song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWater (Kanye West song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starWater (Kanye West song) is part of the Jesus Is King series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 3, 2020Good article nomineeListed
November 24, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Water (Kanye West song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 03:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kyle Peake, I will start my review now. LOVI33 03:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lead[edit]

 Done for the above even though I had already set these credits properly before this edit switched things around --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Clemons and West had a conversation about Jesus, which the song came from" → "The song came from a conversation between Clemons and West about Jesus"
 Done --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Background and recording[edit]

  • First paragraph is really long, maybe split it up into a few?
 Done how's that look? --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Composition and lyrics[edit]

  • Looks Good!

Release and promotion[edit]

  • No problems found, looks good!

Critical reception[edit]

  • Looks good!

Commercial performance[edit]

  • "entered at number 51 on the US Billboard Hot 100" → "entered the US Billboard Hot 100 at number 51"
  • "the track gave Clemons his first appearance on the Hot 100" → "the track gave Clemons his first appearance on the chart"
 Done --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Credits and personnel[edit]

  • Change title to just "Personnel," "Credits and personnel" is used when there are recording locations involved
Are you sure about this? I was thinking that stuff like "recording engineer", "associated performer" and "mastering engineer" makes it titled as of current? --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Okay fair enough, Keep it as is. LOVI33 13:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charts[edit]

  • Looks good!

Notes[edit]

  • Looks good!

References[edit]

  • ref 1 is a bare url, replace with a citation
 Not done I instead removed since it was added in the recent edit that changed the infobox --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

  • Looks good!

Final comments and verdict[edit]

  •  On hold for now. Just a few small changes and I will promote it to GA. Amazing work on the article by the way. LOVI33 04:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    LOVI33 Have made proper fixes for the changes apart from that one. --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Kyle Peake, Okay thats a  Pass. LOVI33 13:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]