Talk:Tyrannotitan

Dinosaurs Mid‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Very comprehensive article, but... as a secondary source, an encyclopedia entry should not rival the primary in detail. If someone who knows more about carnosaurs than I do comes along, maybe you could dumb this down a bit and just add a link to the relevent paper. Dinoguy2 01:42, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed up the article a little bit to make it sound from the third person. A link is still needed.--Ifixmanypages 20:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A little technical?[edit]

This is an excellent and very informative article, however, as someone who doesn't actually know a great deal about the subject i had to look up many of the terms used. (particularly the scientific names for the body parts that have been discovered). Does anyone other than me think that it may be a good idea to add the more common names for the body parts in question for the benefit of dumb people such as myself? --Greebo cat 15:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Bit busy. Good to flag itCas Liber 23:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Information?[edit]

How come there isn't alot of info about this crecture? 360man\

That's because there isn't a lot of information on the creature itself. Paleo Kid (talk) 03:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

swimming[edit]

it swam? cool but it also says ceratosaurus could to, but ceratosaurus's artocle doesnt state that.Spinodontosaurus (talk) 18:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)#[reply]

There's no mention of swimming in the paper so I've removed it. All theropods were probably decent swimmers anyway, though whether tail-propelled is an idea only one or two people have floated. Dinoguy2 (talk) 19:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Mortimer, M. (2004), "The Theropod Database", viewed September 17, 2007. http://home.myuw.net/eoraptor/. Both of these link to this site http://depts.washington.edu/uwisp/. I gonna go ahead and remove them and put new ones in (likely from DinoData) Spinodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Novas, F. E.; S. de Valais, P. Vickers-Rich, and T. Rich (2005). "A large Cretaceous theropod from Patagonia, Argentina, and the evolution of carcharodontosaurids". Naturwissenschaften 92 (5): 226-230. And actually this one just links to another wiki page. Ill remove it too. Spinodontosaurus (talk) 17:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help!? when i edit the page 1. i cant remove the links and 2. i cant add anyting! Spinodontosaurus (talk) 17:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what's up, are you working from a public IP that may have been blocked or restricted? Made the changes either way, the Theropod DB and DinoData are online only so shouldn't be used as data sources anyway. Dinoguy2 (talk) 18:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can edit other pages, any way thanks. Spinodontosaurus (talk) 21:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tyrannotitan length[edit]

According to theropod database, MPEF-PV 1157 (which is the largest Tyrannotitan) measured ~ 12.2 m, while the holotype is only ~ 11.4 m. http://home.comcast.net/~eoraptor/Carnosauria.htm#Tyrannotitanchubutensis. So how 12.2 m could be average? Sorry for not the best english. I am from Poland. 7Alx

There are ? estimates of 13 point something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinosaur Fan (talk • contribs) 12:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weight[edit]

How heavy was it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.134.20.124 (talk) 10:01, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look at Heaviest theropods in Dinosaur size. It was about 4.9-5.6t. Dinosaur Fan (talk) 22:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Femur[edit]

How long is the femur? I'm calculating something to tell my friends my opinion of dinosaur sizes. Dinosaur Fan (talk) 12:20, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]