This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
I like the idea of splitting the 2023 tournament onto its own page. At the very least, let's have if drafted up so when/if the 2024 tournament gets announced it is ready to go. Once multiple editions of the tournament exist, separate pages for each edition will be critical. ColeTrain4EVER (talk) 16:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the current content for the 2023 season is just a list of teams, and one winner named. No evidence this season has significant coverage to pass WP:GNG, and it doesn't meet any of the criteria of WP:SPLIT, not least because the main article is short. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ColeTrain4EVER as it is, the section does not have enough information for its own article. It is likely that it would be approved with proper information and full match lists. Yoblyblob (talk) 18:45, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
