Talk:The Incredible Hulk: Ultimate Destruction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Incredible Hulk: Ultimate Destruction has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Incredible Hulk: Ultimate Destruction is part of the Hulk video games series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 7, 2022Good article nomineeListed
May 11, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 24, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the more irreverent moments of The Incredible Hulk: Ultimate Destruction, such as a golf game with giant balls, were added to break up the story's intensity?
Current status: Good article

Fair use rationale for Image:IHUD-cover-front.jpg[edit]

Image:IHUD-cover-front.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Incredible Hulk: Ultimate Destruction/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 17:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I will review this article due to the ongoing GAN backlog. I will start the review soon. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 17:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments[edit]

General[edit]

  • Add a short description → {{short description|2005 video game}} before the infobox.
  • Implement a unbulleted list for producers per MOS:NOBR → {{ubl|Tim Bennison|Vlad Ceraldi}}.
  • Well-written, I haven't noticed any errors. It is also broad and neutral, the "Reception" section is also well-written.
  • Copyvious unlikely.
  • No recent edit wars.

Images[edit]

  • All are alright.

Sources[edit]

  • Sources are fine too. Good job.

@Cat's Tuxedo: Thanks for being fast, I'm promoting this article. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 19:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Cat's Tuxedo (talk). Self-nominated at 22:06, 7 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is neutral, meets the required length, and is sufficiently referenced. Promoted to GA on January 7, the same day as this nomination. Hook is interesting, succinct, and reliably sourced. QPQ is done. Nothing else needed—this is good to go! – Rhain 07:58, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To T:DYK/P5