Talk:The Hours (novel)

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

AIDS Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject AIDS, an attempt to build a comprehensive, detailed, and accessible guide to AIDS, HIV, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.AIDSWikipedia:WikiProject AIDSTemplate:WikiProject AIDSAIDS articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I don't see why the fact that the three protagonists are 'questionably bisexual' should be the first thing mentioned about the premise of this book. The discussion of each character occurs in the next paragraph down. The book is, of course, about much more than the character's sexuality. I will ensure discussion of their sexuality is included in detail elsewhere.

Autobiographical novels tag?[edit]

Why is this book in the 'autobiographical novels' category?--Anchoress 13:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I, too, am curious as to the categorization... and as no one has yet answered the question, I'm removing the tag. --Victoriagirl 21:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

typos[edit]

Did the book really contain typographical errors such as 'unimstakable'? --darklilac 00:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The hours-ed harris.jpg[edit]

Image:The hours-ed harris.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement?[edit]

I wasn't entirely sure what to do about this, apart from bringing it up here, but the section on major literary themes; fascination with mortality, societal roles, etc, seems to have been directly copied and pasted from the Sparknotes.com notes for The Hours. --Astraimperator 00:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You were absolutely correct, and I'm glad to brought it to our attention! Because it was a blatant copyright violation of Sparknotes, I removed the material as per WP:COPY, which states "If some of the content of a page really is an infringement, then the infringing content should be removed, and a note to that effect should be made on the talk page, along with the original source. If the author's permission is obtained later, the text can be restored." Thanks for the alert. :) (ps: I also moved this thread to the bottom of the page for chronological reasons. María (críticame) 12:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vaughan or Vaughn[edit]

Is Clarissa's surname supposed to be Vaughn or Vaughan? My edition has it as Vaughan, with the extra a, but the article consistently uses Vaughn. Which is it? Lunapuella 14:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mrs Dalloway1.jpg[edit]

Image:Mrs Dalloway1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary[edit]

I noticed that the plot summary is incomplete. Is this deliberate (to avoid spoilers or something?) or accidental (the editor who added the summary got distracted, maybe?)? Akatari (talk) 23:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The excuse:

"Note: This Summary does not contain the whole book, nor end at the ending.

The stream-of-consciousness style being so prominent in this work, a summary of the plot based on physical action does not give a thorough understanding of the content of the work. In the novel, action occurring in the physical world (i.e.: characters doing things, such as talking, walking etc.) is far outweighed by material existing in the thought and memory of the protagonists. Some discretion must be made in a plot summary as to which of these thoughts and memories warrant detailing."

seems like malarkey to me; it looks clear that someone started a super detailed summary of each section and then wandered off. As is, this section could use either a full overhaul or a deletion. AlCracka (talk) 10:19, 19 August 2015

its still like that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.8.118.10 (talk) 06:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i deleted/edited a lot of it but didn't add any more Astroroshell (talk) 18:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Hours novella.jpg[edit]

Image:The Hours novella.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]