Talk:Table of the largest known graphs of a given diameter and maximal degree

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Result: Page moved to name without capital letters. ~~ GB fan ~~ 04:56, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Table of graphs → Table Of Degree-Diameter Graphs

current name is strikingly uninformative 16:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Agree / support. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 21:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Or better to Table of degree-diameter graphs. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:13, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

This was an improvement; but it has missed the mark. The subject does not cover "degree-diameter graphs", it covers the size of graphs of a given degree and diameter. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, that's very true, but the most recent move seems to give an excessively long title, which nobody would be likely to type in. If we can't have Table of degree-diameter graphs, I'd suggest something perhaps like Table of largest known degree-diameter graphs, although that's not ideal either. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 09:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which again implies that there is such a thing as a degree-diameter graph. If there were, it would have nothing to do with this table. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right of course. I still feel a shorter title would be better, but I can't think of one addressing that problem. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 22:49, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]