Talk:Statue of Edward Colston/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 17:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Lead
  • Colston's years alive are in the lead uncited, but do not appear anywhere else in the article, so they're kinda uncited
Description
Controversy

This is all for the prose. I'm gonna have some referencing comments, but I've got to take a break now. More to come. Hog Farm Bacon 18:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References (ref numbers from this revision
  • Ref 6: Remove "BBC – History", and then add the two authors and the publication date. Use BBC as the publisher, and drop the website field
  • Latimer needs the publisher, publishing location, and the OCLC
  • Bristol Radical History Group does not appear to be an RS
    • We can swap out the stuff they're verifying. They seem to be using a few very old newspapers etc as their source (eg the Bristol Mercury). There are archives of it here for example, so I can swap those out for the direct source, but I don't have access to British Newspaper Archive to verify. Will try to ask if someone has access, or see if I can find another way to access. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Yeah, try WP:RSX if you need help.
        • So I've gotten access to the papers and swapped out the source. Basically, reading through, I gather the following: £407 was raised from appeals at the time the statue was put up. The Treasuer paid the £800 which it cost. Public appeals were made to collect the rest of the funds. At the end of 1985, £650 was collected. What came of the remaining £150 I don't know, it's not in these copies. Perhaps the debt was waived, or as the Bristol Radical History Group claims it was anonymously donated, but I can't find anything to verify it. Suggestions on what to do? I guess we'll just have to leave out the £150 part, and only explain up to the £650 we can source?
  • Wilkins needs the OCLC
  • "A petition to remove the statue had garnered more than 11,000 signatures" - Close paraphrasing, the source says "A petition to remove it had garnered more than 11,000 signatures". That's way to close of paraphrasing
  • What makes Inspiring City a RS?
    • checkY Nothing, I guess. It isn't verifying anything the other source isn't anyway, I suppose, so have removed. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref 77 - Drop the via parameter, and use BBC as the publisher
    • Via dropped. Just to clarify, do you mean change to |publisher=? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Yes.
        • Also looks like the other cites to "BBC News" currently are also using |work=. Should they all be changed to |publisher=BBC? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • I'd say so.
            • One of my changes on this were reverted, see edit summary of Special:Diff/984912890. I'm not particularly familiar with cite templates, so not sure what the standard is. Comments? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
              • It's fine as it is, I guess. Not a big deal.

I did some more spot checks, which came up clean. Placing on hold. Hog Farm Bacon 21:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.