Talk:Songkok

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Brunei.

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

earlier comment[edit]

the white peci (which is worn by haji) is not Indonesian cap. it is from arab, and they have different designs, usages, and compositions. compare these pics:
File:Fotopresdn.jpg and File:Abu Bakar Bashir.jpg

Peace. --Nielswik_(talk) 13:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be limited only to Malaysian article stub, it is a South East Asian attire by heritage, and should not be limited only to Malaysia. Beware. Ennio morricone (talk) 04:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article has Malaysian slant, but I think it is clearly described that songkok/peci is South East Asian. The Malaysian stub mark can be removed when the article is expanded enough. Gombang (talk) 06:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

This article needs better historical sources. The fez was only adopted by the Ottomans in the 1820's, so the newspaper article claiming it is the origin of the songkok and also that the songkok has been around since the 13th century is contradictory. --Macrakis (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The newspaper article is incorrect and I wouldn't even consider it a reliable source. The songkok is obviously not that old and wasn't even common until the 20th century. Morinae (talk) 12:11, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Songkok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:31, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]