Talk:Sauropodomorpha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Isanosaurus and Antetonitrus: the first Triassic sauropods discovered[edit]

The descriptions of Isanosaurus in 2000 and Antetonitrus in 2003 confirm that sauropods diverged from Thecodontosaurus along with the prosauropods. This shows that sauropods and prosauropods evolved from a common ancestor.

Sauropodiformes[edit]

On [1] I found Sauropodiformes as a group of sauropodomorphs that included all but the Guaibasauridae. It was said that it was named by Martinez et al. in 2011. Is this true and if so should it be included in the article? Reid,iain james (talk) 00:32, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The clade diagrams are inconsistent with those on dinosaur pages[edit]

And I cannot find some dinosaur clades in the clade diagrams on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.243.199.239 (talk) 07:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any in particular? They may be nested within sub-clades like Anchisauria which are not expanded here due to space restrictions. Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sauropodomorpha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]