Talk:Rubricaire
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of Rubricaire from the French Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
Particularly rough[edit]
@ByTheDarkBlueSea: @Scope creep: this is now available. To do these imports I need to switch into Desktop mode, which means that in it I am working on text one word wide stacked vertically, one on top of the other, and the controls are covered by a passive-aggressive warning that comes up every three minutes or so, that my text is 79 percent French and I should consider translating some more, while I wait for my screen to unfreeze so I can do that. Mumble. It still beats screen flipping though. Elinruby (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Elinruby: This whole article is completely unsourced. It won't make it out of draft, in its current state. Can you source it and then give us a shout. Its not in any kind of fit state for working on at the moment. scope_creepTalk 23:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- nod, ok. Hadn't looked at that yet, been working on translation, was focused on topic and language. It would of interest if it were sourced though? Just checking, as it will be a higher priority project if it will result in somebody working on it. But sure, it will need references. Check. Elinruby (talk) 23:34, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Dubious tags[edit]
I think these are about the translation, since in both cases there was something that could be improved about it -- the first pass was done in haste on the assumption that other people wanted to work on it, but not import it. Wiki-ADD apparently kicked in for those people, so I am coming back to this. If there was some other reason for the dubious tags, please post here.
By the way, shout out to whoever is responsible for the references, with trans-titles, even. Elinruby (talk) 03:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Whoever keeps tagging the name change as dubious[edit]
Help an editor out; I don't understand the objection. Possibly me, and I am thinking it might be internal consistency with other sections, but I shouldn't have to guess. Elinruby (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
This sequence needs a rewrite: that chronicle exists but we should make clear that it is considered to be a later flight of fancy.Elinruby (talk) 23:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Parish of Sainte-Gemme section[edit]
Seems to have been intended as a summary. If kept it should probably move up, but I am inclined to think it's redundant. Will check this point by point the nexttimeI am in here Elinruby (talk) 22:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
possible source[edit]
possible source: https://www.academia.edu/keypass/UzgrQjNWSXdaUGtGS2t5ci92NGh5MkZjR0lEbmxhSWxrbEVlaURRV2RUaz0tLUxReEJMcmZSdnp0SVlkcmd3V3MxNFE9PQ==--c701ab1cb34145b75fe1a1011773768969f7cbfc/t/bmY56-Ra8YpeN-bhywRv/resource/work/37468119/Le_castellum_du_Rubricaire_et_ses_thermes_Leur_place_au_sein_de_la_cit%C3%A9_des_Diablintes_et_de_larchitecture_militaire_romaine_tardive_Volume_1_Texte_M%C3%A9moire_de_M2_?email_work_card=title Elinruby (talk) 05:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Saint Haduin[edit]
Have not been able to establish that this is the same person mentioned in the text, but have not taken extraordinary measures to do so either Elinruby (talk) 06:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)