Talk:Pro-war rhetoric

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Additional information:
/
	No existing task force includes this article in its scope; to propose a new one, please leave a message on the main project talk page.

Why No Anti-War Rhetoric Page?[edit]

Is this yet more proof of Wiki's socialist/left wing bias? I think so. The reference materials used for this article are nothing more than manuals on how to be a left winger. Ymous 14:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Though the text is less impressive, there is substantial work of art and style given to all of the liberal motifs of peace, love, and homosexuality. Jessemckay (talk) 00:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a "Pro-War Rhetoric" page and an "Anti-War Movement" page, but no "Anti-War Rhetoric" or "Pro-War Movement" page. I would say the best course of action would be to delete this page and instead create a "Anti-War Movement" page. This would increase consistency and reduce bias. 74.105.10.169 (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duties[edit]

A declaration of war is an official act, usually not a rhetoric event, apart from the public announcement which addresses the masses to mobilize support. However, the popular "pro-war" rhetoric which isn't reflecting indoctrination and propaganda, is about patriotism, and the duties to fulfill to serve the country. Please try to edit less politicized. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Ronald Reid's Three Topoi into Pro-war rhetoric[edit]

The article on Ronald Reid´s Three Topoi is very similar in content with the one on Pro-war rhetoric. In addition, it is an orphan. I propose to keep the Pro-war rhetoric article because it has a more general title and has a relevant number of incoming links Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 23:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]