Talk:Previously On/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • "turning it into the black-and-white, 1950s style first seen in 'Filmed Before a Live Studio Audience'." – mentioning and linking an episode article directly into the plot section seems weird. Most Marvel articles would include a note with "As depicted in [media]" instead.
  • Remove the comma after "disassembled remains".
  • "to try balance the" → "to try to balance the"
  • "who she is in present day" → "who she is in the present day"
  • Is it "series' premiere" or "series premiere"?
  • "large amount of particle effects" → "large number of particle effects"
  • Avengers: Age of Ultron is linked twice.
  • "heart-broken" → "heartbroken"
  • Remove the comma after "a green screen for the sequence".
  • Remove the comma after the quoted word "delicate".
  • #Critical_response: The second paragraph has two reviews, the third paragraph has two, the fourth has one (?), and the fifth and final paragraph has two. There are currently twenty-two reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. Reduce the abundance of quotes and add some of them (WP:RECEPTION).
  • Be consistent with The Art of VFX and Art of VFX.
  • Wikilink Dave Itzkoff and mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • @Some Dude From North Carolina: I have addressed these points. For "series' premiere", that line is referring to the premiere (i.e. debut / first release) of the series rather than the first episode of the series, which would be the "series premiere". - adamstom97 (talk) 05:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed