Talk:Nanuqsaurus

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

new paper states it was widespread[edit]

So there must now be more than one specimen? " ... the large predatory dinosaur, Nanuqsaurus hoglundi seems to have had a more ubiquitous distribution across the landscape. " - Anthony R. Fiorillo, Paul J. McCarthy & Peter P. Flaig (2015)

A Multi-disciplinary Perspective on Habitat Preferences among Dinosaurs in a Cretaceous Arctic Greenhouse World, North Slope, Alaska (Prince Creek Formation: Upper Maastrichtian). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology (advance online publication) doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.07.024

Time for an update by a SME. HammerFilmFan (talk) 15:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what does the paper say this is based on? Maybe it's in the supplementary material? FunkMonk (talk) 15:29, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This paper doesn't seem to be out yet. Do you have a link? Dinoguy2 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should be this one: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018215003910 I could imagine it is just based on scattered teeth. FunkMonk (talk) 16:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]