Talk:Megalosauridae

Dinosaurs Mid‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rsugarman.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Torvosauridae[edit]

Shouldn't there be something about Torvosauridae here? Benosaurus 01:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is, in the second paragraph. We'll get the consistency bugs worked out. J. Spencer 04:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What makes a Megalosaurid?[edit]

The article says that they had sharp teeth and 3 claws on each hand, but so did all the carnosaurs. 122.109.250.74 (talk) 07:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's just part of a general description, not qualifying characteristics. Given the poor state of knowledge about Megalosaurus, there probably aren't any reliable ways to tell if something is a megalosaurid by looking at it; megalosaurid is in use as a traditional thing. You could make a more abstract definition, like "all megalosauroid theropods closer to Megalosaurus than Spinosaurus", but that doesn't define their features, either. J. Spencer (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it's just a traditional thing then why is there a classification chart of the "family". 122.109.250.74 (talk) 06:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cladistic classifications are based on relationships, not key features. According to Tom Holtz's definition (2004), a megalosaurid is any dinosaur more closely related to Megalosaurus than to Spinosaurus, Allosaurus, or modern birds. Dinoguy2 (talk) 09:05, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In that case we need a better general description. Any other features sheared by all Megalosaurids? 122.109.250.74 (talk) 08:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]